Can't wait to see how they try to wiggle out of this one

I'll second that

wait, what?

So you condemn Governor Northam's talk of a post-birth abortion?

File this under “highly doubtful.”

Masks and vaccines affect your body.
Abortions affect someone else’s body.

Learn the difference, because it’s a big one.

I know that understanding that an abortion affects the baby more than the woman is too much for you to understand, but at least try.

When you get your information from people who want to reduce the population of the world, of course they’ll say an unborn baby isn’t actually a baby. It’s how they get you to believe it’s okay.

Last I checked, doctors and scientists make people live longer and increase the population. This is why humanity has lived longer, healthier lives now than when the church dominated daily life (The Dark Ages)

Last I checked, a healthy pregnancy doesn’t permanently hurt a woman. Unless it’s going to cause health problems or is caused by rape or incest, the baby’s life should be the highest priority.

It’s funny how 100% of the people who are pro-choice are the ones who’s mother didn’t make that ‘choice’ for themselves. Too bad.

And how does that refute my statement?

Maybe your parents wished they had made a different choice about you, even though you aren’t a pro-lifer, but not mine.

And definitely not me or my wife.

That just f*cked up your fake statistic, didn’t it?

Lol. your wife can't speak for herself huh?

If she was on ImgFlip, she would, but since she doesn’t make memes, why would she be a member?

Doesn’t take a genius to figure that out.

Bless your cotton socks, you're trying really hard aren't you?

Mine was funnier. And original.

Nope, if you want to dice semantics like that, no zygotes are involved in most abortions.

If you’re going to be an arrogant jackass, at least bother to get your facts right.

An arrogant jackass, you mean like someone who would tell a woman ehat medical procedures she can and can't have based on his feelings?

No, they are both human lives deserving protection.

Yes, unless the pregnancy will cause major health problems to the woman or if it was a case of rape/incest.

Life supersedes inconvenience.
Life supersedes discomfort.
Life supersedes almost everything.

And you are nothing but a clump of cells. I don't waste my time talking with clumps. Bye.

If an unborn baby is one, why aren’t you one? It is literally true. Physically, you can be accurately described as a clump of cells. Does that bother you? Did you never stop to think through how easily your talking points can be turned against you?

And yet you remain a clump of cells. Physically, it is a completely accurate description…unless there is something more than your mere physical makeup that matters, in which case the same may apply to an unborn baby.

So you’re just a clump of cells.

And yet, physically, it is still accurate to describe you as a clump of cells—unless there is more than the mere physical there, which as I pointed out, may also apply to that unborn baby. Do you not see the problem?

It was DemoKKKrats, who are the leftists of today.

An old liberal (Republican) value. Now liberals (Democrats) are trying to make EVERYONE a slave, but this time to the government instead of specific individuals.

Like I said, it’s an ‘old liberal value’ that was pushed by the Republicans and one which the Democrats fought against.

Fast forward to today and the Republicans are the ones who are trying to ‘conserve’ our values, one of them being freedom, which once again the Democrats are fighting against.

Strange, how the "freedoms" leftists love to fight for always seem to come in the form of coercing other people.

Which people are the Republicans trying to enslave?

Which ones are they trying to conserve freedom for?

Ideology hasn’t changed much for the Democrats all these centuries. It just went from enslaving a select group to individual people to enslaving everyone to the government.

Considering that today’s “liberals” are far more interested in castigating people who never held slaves than condemning societies where it is practiced RIGHT NOW, I’m going to say liberals are not especially interested in abolishing slavery. You’re clearly far more interested in hating white people.

Yes, but there are societies where slavery is going on RIGHT NOW. I almost never hear leftists say a word about that. Instead, they're obsessed with condemning societies which ended slavery 150 years ago.

And you also don’t live 150 years ago, yet for some reason you yap all the time about that.

"I'm talking about in the 19th century, not today"

That's exactly my point. You have to constantly talk about what happened 150 years ago because that's the easiest way for you to get to your goal: hating white people. If you talked about today, you'd find it much harder.

And yes, you hate white people. Just admit it so we can move on.

I’ve seen how you talk. You make every excuse for blacks and their violence possible and always always choose the worst possible interpretation of a white’s behavior. Yes, you hate white people.

Hmmm. I don’t remember them saying “Freedom for everyone…who is like me. Screw the rest.”

So that means it’s just your interpretation of their words, like how you always try to twist mine to fit your narrative.