HYPOCRISY BE LIKE

This _ForTheLulz guy is a huge pussy lmao probably some inbred hick that prays everyday for Trump to come back. He thinks everything he disagrees with is “COMMUNIZM” like the typical brain dead right winger.

I’d be angry too if I were an inbred basement dweller that supports a failed reality tv star

Not even close to the same - but it’s about the only argument you have.. so I’ll give it to you.

How is it not the same? Explain for everyone's benefit.

Of course, I’d love to.

First answer two questions - and it doesn’t matter if you’re a man or woman:

Are you okay with showing your bare face to a child? Do you think that’s okay to do?

Are you okay with showing your naked ass to a child? Do you think that’s okay to do?

If you answered a yes followed by a no - that’s how it’s not the same.

How is no shirt leaving your ass exposed to a kid? Its rhetorical. It is acceptable to walk down the street without a shirt. No pants will get you arrested for exposure, no shirt wont. Your arguement is lame, and has no merit.

It's kinda like your cult leaders claims, full of shit.

So the sign says “No shirt, no shoes, no service”? Yeah? So I’m able to walk in bare-assed because it doesn’t specifically mention pants.

To argue a mask is the same as clothing is brain dead.

Shirts and pants, varying percentages of shoes are made of cloth. Shirt and shoes are worn on the body. Shirts and shoes are clothing. Masks are made of cloth. Masks are worn on the body. Thus, masks are clothing.

What was it you said about it not taking a rocket scientist to figure this stuff out and using the brain that God graciously gave you?

So how long have you been wearing a mask as clothing?

The amount of time I've been wearing masks as clothing doesn't change the reality that masks are clothing, Lulz. Nice attempt at obfuscation.

Obfuscation? Not at all. Just wanted to see how long you’ve been drinking from the Jonestown punch bowl.

You cornered yourself yet again, Lulz. Good work. XD

And, to answer your question, I wear masks as clothing every time I'm doing something which generates silica dust or VOC or going into crowded areas during a pandemic as any rational, sane, scientifically literate individual does.

According to the Bible, God made Humanity naked. So yes, both of those things are okay and the same.

Right and they ‘were not ashamed’.. and what happens after that?

The sign doesn’t say pants are required. You’re cool with me walking into a restaurant that you and your family are eating at.. swinging my dick into the wind? Waving it in front of your children, mother, or sister?

God made it, and all God's Creation is Good, is it not? You're doing an awful lot of beating around the bush and no explaining the difference.

You’ve already proven my point. You believe - at all costs and without reason - your argument to be true.

Sorry, Lulz, but belief isn't required. Medical Science has proven my standpoint and you were fighting a losing battle from the moment you first clicked "Post Comment". Masks effect one's physical wellbeing by protecting the lungs, shirts and shoes by protecting the skin and feet.

Soooo...now that you've proven you know nothing of communicable diseases like Impetigo, Tinea (that's athlete's foot/ringworm...surely you must have heard of those), scabies, shingles (that's chicken pox...how could you not know something so basic?) care to keep taking swings?

I have been saying this for a year. No shirt no shoes no service IS A SAFETY THING.

Try getting into the courthouse without shoes.

I guess pants are not. Time to whip them out I guess.

Go for it. Get a record for exposure to prove your point.

Not at all - you walked right into it.

To prove your argument true, you claim that it’s okay for grown adults to be naked in front of children. Perhaps seek a mental health professional for that one. But, I expect nothing less from the party that worships sex, LGBTQ, and the sexualization of children.

Oh, wait...my mistake; you said you'd love to explain and now you're proving the opposite.

Again; read. Use your brain that God graciously gave you.

I have....but you, clearly, haven't been.

Funny how Naturists have whole communities where everyone is naked 24/7 (although they tend to make an exception for footwear because there can be sharp things in the grass) and everything runs smoothly. Soooo...got any valid arguments? Or even any arguments which don't depend on political/sociological bias?

Great arguement. Too true. Do whatever you want with no clothes on, but you need shoes. It is a safety issue.

You're the one who promised an explanation if I answered your questions. I answered your questions and now you're trying to weasel out of your promise. Explain the difference between mask, shirt, shoe requirements.

Sure, I’ll give you that. Does a shirt impact the function of your lungs? Shoes? No? You mean BOTH have zero effects on your physical well-being?

There you go.

Wrong. Both shirt and shoes have an impact on one's physical well-being by blocking the transmission of communicable disease....just like masks. Got any valid explanations?

You’re argument is “what can YOU do for ME”. My argument is - do it yourself. Want to wear a mask? Do it. Want an experimental vaccine for a Krispy Kreme donut? Do it.

Don’t drag me into your Orwellian world of big government control.

You promised an explanation. What you delivered is obfuscation. And now you're trying to steer the conversation away to an irrelevant topic. Sad, dude.

An irrelevant topic is how shoes prevent ringworm. You do know we were talking about masks, right?

Still trying to bail yourself out, huh. Lulz? You've done a lot of yapping but, funnily enough, you've still not explained how safety requirements involving shoes, shirts and masks to block the transmission of communicable diseases are magically different. :D

Read Fauci’s email on the “effectiveness” of masks. TL;DR they don’t work while in turn hurting your immune system. But, please keep wearing them.

"Was the TLDR for you, since I didn’t expect you to go out and read it yourself. I thought right."

First off, thank you so much for demonstrating the disjointed nature of your thought processes. You cornered yourself again, Lulz.

Secondly, care to delete that comment and try again? Or you could leave it in place and try to make a follow-up clarification of what I can only presume was an attempt at clarification.

Sorry, Lulz, but your comment comes across as an admission. Oops.

Take it however you’d like to. I’m use to libs attempting to spin the narratives.

Interesting....you pointed to Fauci's email as evidence to back your claims but then, in the same comment, admit you didn't read it and proceed to make more claims. Bravo, dude. XD

Was the TLDR for you, since I didn’t expect you to go out and read it yourself. I thought right.

No, Lulz, the topic is and has been hypocrisy, the example given is the disparate nature of reaction to mask requirements as a means of preventing/slowing the spread of communicable disease and the reaction (specifically lack thereof) to requirements of shirt and shoes to prevent/slow the spread of communicable disease.

Hmmm...what was that you said about reading comprehension?

Still trying to bail yourself out, huh? Sad.

Keep wearing your mask, slave.

I’m unsure how you wear your shirt and shoes - but I’ve never been sufficiently muffled over my face by them. Perhaps the purchase of a picture book on Amazon will help you understand how to wear them properly.

That's weak, dude. Let me know when you're done trying to bail yourself out.

Oh and shoes also keep you from cutting the soles of your feet....pretty sure that counts as "effects on your physical well-being".

On your lungs? Read again and keep grasping at an argument.

No, Lulz, I didn't win; you defeated yourself. My only contribution was standing by and watching it happen.

Yea that group doesnt know when to get out of its own way.

And there it is...you cornered yourself, Lulz, unwittingly wrecked your own arguments and now you're lashing out at me for your own failing.

I have no idea what you’re talking about.. so I guess this is over. I was talking about LUNGS and now you’re on how shoes help your feet. Not sure how we got there - but not surprised. It’s what liberals do.. railroad the conversation until it doesn’t make sense and then scream “I win!” when their opponent has no f**king clue what they are talking about.

All I can say is this:

Keep being a slave and ensure your obedience to big government never fails. Do as CNN tells you - think as they think.

Reductio ad absurdum is the last stand of those who have a failing argument, Lulz.

Oh my, you're scrambling so hard to bail yourself out you actually just argued my point for me. That's priceless!!!! :D

You’re talking about the “soles” of your feet.. has nothing to do with what I said. So either your reading comprehension is at a 2nd grade level or you’re just going off on a liberal tirade.

If you’re wearing masks on your feet - you’re doing it wrong. Has the same level of protection - but I don’t think that’s how they are intended to be used.

Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this shit out - just turn off the television.

No, it doesn't. But you still haven't....funny thing that.

You’re crying over wearing a mask lmao you’re a huge pussy