Imgflip Logo Icon

Always check their sources. Found a quack news outlet they're trying to float: Natural News. What a joke.

Always check their sources. Found a quack news outlet they're trying to float: Natural News. What a joke. | CITIZENS; THE REASON THE RIGHT WING WANTS TO DEPLATFORM MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS SO THAT YOU CAN TURN TO FRINGE NEWS AND CONSPIRACY THEORY OUTLETS THAT PROPEGATE THEIR LIES. HERE'S WHAT YOU CAN DO: CHECK WITH ASSOCIATED PRESS, THEY HAVE HIGH STANDARDS FOR CREDIBILITY AND UNBIASED REPORTING. CHECK WITH RUETERS. CHECK FOX NEWS TO HEAR THEIR TAKE, FIND THE SIMILARITIES, WEED OUT THE BIAS. | image tagged in captain america psa,memes,roll safe think about it | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
533 views 20 upvotes Made by Cerebrophage 3 years ago in politicsTOO
16 Comments
5 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Wish there were a way to fix typos without doing the whole darn thing over.
Reuters - most will figure it out I'm sure.
4 ups, 3y
True M'Fcking story
4 ups, 3y
USAToday is also very non-partisan and non-biased.
3 ups, 3y
Gaslight the media so no one will believe them when they report on what we're doing | CNN is fake news! Everyone has lost faith in CNN! And do you know why? Because we keep saying that CNN is fake news! | image tagged in qanon shaman clown applying makeup,cnn fake news,mainstream media,conservative logic,sheeple | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
My go to's are AP, NPR, and Fox News (written only)
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I check sources on the right to try to extract what they share in common on the left. That's how you tell what the facts are.
2 ups, 3y
True. Also, you can kind of tell a lot by what either side doesn't cover. And I've seen both sides do that. The press, even the good press, is a business. Some have better morals than others, but I try to never forget they are writing for an audience - they don't want waste effort writing something that won't be consumed.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I check the 'don't shrink option' when I upload info graphics. That's how you ensure legibility.
3 ups, 3y
gracias
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
If I need actual information on something I have a primary-sources only rule.

If I'm just relaying what I've heard then it's entirely fair game, since you can hear something well, anywhere.

If I just want to get my 'daily briefing', then the usual course of traffic is FOX (I admit I indulge in a bit of confirmation-bias, but any story worth reading is then the subject of further research elsewhere), followed by the BBC and the National Interest (mostly for military/foreign subjects).
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
That's fine. This is more leveled at this who list every single centrist, leftist news network as fake news.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I link my far-right buddies NBC articles whenever we have debates just to mess with them. It's seriously hilarious when they scream at my 'horribly biased sources' but then respond with infowars and Armstrong Economics links. lol
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Yeah, it's good times over here in IGK's world. lol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
My question is, how do you deal with people citing things like infowars and newsmax (things of that sort)?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Armstrong Economics op-ed: author was claiming that the cruise ships being withheld from St. Vincent islands during the recent volcanic eruptions were part of a Nazi-esque movement to exterminate anti vaxxers from the populace.

What really happened? Cruise lines offered their ships to take on islanders in order to ease the logistical burden on eruption shelter populations. Logically, they only wanted vaccinated passengers, because the shelters were secure and the population in no imminent danger. I guarantee that, should lava flows have endangered a shelter or even the entire island, the cruise ships would have taken all islanders on board.

People who take this stuff seriously are often beyond reason...the issue is, you only cement that status and promote tribalism by labeling them as such, so I make it policy to always present as many well-sourced facts from outlets (FOX is a great gateway platform) to show how their narrative is wrong. My favorite line, and one that seems to fail less often than others, is to point out, "Look, if FOX isn't taking that angle, there's probably no credence to it." FOX will never hesitate to run a story that scores points for the center-right/right, just as CNN and MSNBC never fail to score points for the center-left/left. Usually you can use that as a decent pry bar to delve into the matter.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Captain America PSA
  • Roll Safe Think About It
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    CITIZENS; THE REASON THE RIGHT WING WANTS TO DEPLATFORM MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS SO THAT YOU CAN TURN TO FRINGE NEWS AND CONSPIRACY THEORY OUTLETS THAT PROPEGATE THEIR LIES. HERE'S WHAT YOU CAN DO: CHECK WITH ASSOCIATED PRESS, THEY HAVE HIGH STANDARDS FOR CREDIBILITY AND UNBIASED REPORTING. CHECK WITH RUETERS. CHECK FOX NEWS TO HEAR THEIR TAKE, FIND THE SIMILARITIES, WEED OUT THE BIAS.