What About Jussie Smollett & Consequences For Fake Hate?

I follow a YouTube channel that highlight fake hate crimes and do it in a hysterical way.

Would you dropping the name? I'd like to take a look at some point.

Look above.

Wow... none of those other comments where there as I typed my comment. This is one of those moments when one realizes they type WAYYYY too damn slow! Many thanks... I'll give it a look... and an upvote from me to you!

Your comment came at about the same time as his comment so I didn't want to repeat myself. But yeah, it's worth watching, especially if you are a Conservative or a Libertarian. I believe he is a Libertarian and she's more Conservative. But he fact checks everything in his videos and discusses them pretty rationally.

Sounds entertaining...you gonna share that link? LOL

Matt Christiansen and Blonde in the Belly of the Beast do a live show every Sunday night at 8pm Central Time (Texas time). At some point during their show they do the hate crime hoax of the week.

I can't find information on this. Maybe I'm searching for the wrong terms?

Not saying anything about THIS specific meme, I haven’t researched. But, OP posts stuff that is frequently sourced from dubious sources. And if I AM saying that (since I know we have vastly different opinions, sources) it’s probably worth noting lol

There you go again, thinking with your "LittleHead2". Hoping that is "worth noting" as well since your biased side chooses to NOT report news that is negative to your agenda. Whatever happened to Jussie Smollett? The media was all too happy to report on fake Trump supporters in his hoax until they found out he concocted the whole false scenario proving my point....kinda like this story!

The media loves to censor news as is quite obvious when it comes to the vaccine issue as well. A lot of Doctors have spoken out and warned people of the potential consequences only to have their videos and articles yanked down. These are medical physicians who have everything to lose and nothing to gain from telling the truth. We used to be known for our free speech and now we are known for censorship and control of information thanks to Democrat Socialists.

Btw, when you start thinking with your Big Head, instead of pontificating with your little one, I will be glad to converse with you.

I appreciate it. I can disagree with people on interpretation...but generally we should be able to get in the ballpark when it comes to facts.

Thank you. She is black, but in looking up the actual news story, I see no linkage to BLM.

Since she was the perpetrator of a HOAX, the mainstream media won't report it. This has been proven time and again when I post anything NOT positive about the liberal agenda. She was portrayed as a BLM activist so in keeping with their mission to support/defend BLM at all costs, the media chose to not report it. Remember how the "riots" were "mostly peaceful" as BLM & Anti-fa burned, looted and murdered? They call themselves "journalists"....I call them liars because if they omit, change, or present a story as factual news that is not true, they deserve the title.

In her broken words (not mine), the expelled student parrots what she has learned through the biased media....

Unanka claimed she felt out-of-place in society and told how to act in the "white community" and watch what she says. "Victoria don't drive on the road because the cop could stop you and arrest you," Unanka parroted. "Victoria befriend white people so they don't say you're racist or anything. Victoria do this. Victoria do that," she continued, alleging there's immense pressure on black kids these days.

[image deleted] So...the theory goes that the MSM went back and deleted any mention of her being related to BLM...instead of doing something really crazy like not covering the story.

What about OAN, NewsMax, and other media that don't support BLM? The media is a business - if news isn't being accurately reported somebody should fill that niche, don't you think?

Proven time and again - I don't think 'proven' means what you think it means

The riots are mostly peaceful - protests were in over 2000 cities and in 60 countries. Yes there were cities that had violence occur, but not the majority of those cities.

Burned, Looted, and Murdered - I don't dispute the property damage and looting (though I have a feeling the scope is exaggerated in your head), but most of the homicides reported as part of BLM were crimes in the area and not actually related. When they were related, it was often the protesters who were killed.

I said, "the mainstream media won't report it" and "the media chose to not report it" and never said anything about deletion. Guess you were 'sleeping' when reading, dragon.

I have posted many articles that the lame-stream media chose not to cover so proof enough along with daily news stories that I search and cannot find on liberal news outlets. I cannot tell you the number of times I have experienced this void in news coverage by the leftist media.

PEACEFUL? The financial cost of the rioting is on its way to at least $2 billion....article below from Sep of 2020....much higher now.

Cost of Recent Riot Damages Are the Worst in U.S. History
Katie PavlichKatie Pavlich| @KatiePavlich|Posted: Sep 16, 2020
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/09/16/the-financial-cost-of-recent-riots-has-been-tabulated-n2576294

Not murders but they "were crimes in the area"? Reminds me of the deaths reported by people who took the Covid vaccine and died within a few hours, that day or within a few days but the cause was listed as something 'other than the vaccine'. LMAO.

At least 25 Americans were killed during protests and political unrest in 2020
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/31/americans-killed-protests-political-unrest-acled

Let's face it. We don't think alike...geez, we aren't even on the same planet so have a good evening and please open your mind to "facts and real news" and not the sissified interpretation & false fact-checking by liberals.

Sure - but you would be talking about scrubbing past mentions of her, social media, etc. Not reporting her involvement is one thing - making it so that it never happened is another.

Media hardly ever lies on either side - but you are right, they do manipulate by what they cover. But then both sides to that. You assume malice - I go back to it being a business. They don't cover things that might lose them readership. Would that it weren't true. But other than the government getting involved and regulating (which is the worst idea ever), I'm not sure what to do about it. I just have list of news sources that aren't as bad as the others and then double check against some news sources that are generally philosophically opposed to my point of view. That's what it takes to get an unbiased picture - you have to filter through a lot of bias.

Still mostly peaceful - it just so happens that these are the biggest protests in American history and so a small percentage of them going violent is still a huge number.

People do die after taking vaccines. It is as naïve to think that wouldn't happen as it is to think their would be no reactions or deaths. But yes, if you look up individual records you'll find that the homicides (from for instance the guardian link you provided) for the most part weren't related - or had nothing to do with the protesters themselves. When it did involve the protesters, they were often 'mistakes' like the protester who was open carrying in las Vegas and the police mistook his gun for a bat and fired beanbags on him (I didn't make that up), then he fled and other cops fired on him while he was fleeing. And lets me honest -> 25 deaths you can go through those individually. Included in those are Rosenbaum and Huber who were shot by Rittenhouse; two California officers killed by a Boogaloo extremist...and others that weren't really related to protests.

Fact checkers show their work. You shouldn't accept anything like that at face value, but they can help stuff that makes it past your own confirmation bias. If you double check and its false, fine, but I've yet to find anyone who could point me to an inaccurate fact check.

what's your source?