the circular logic of CRT

No, you're just plain racist and so is your new god, critical race theory. It's base solely on racism.

The meme was meant to illustrate the irrational argument of CRT-proponents who claim that CRT's theories about white supremacy are correct, and that people who doubt those theories are white supremacists.

Animals are all different colors , so are birds and plants , etc .

Western civilization created the means to create affluence. It is not the whites fault that people decided to reject it and ended up with shitholes and are envious of what we have attained. We aren't just going to give you that affluence because you have less, you need to work for it. Any outsider that embraces our culture can be successful. African immigrants on average make more than most with European ancestors. That's because they are hungry and they know what living in a country that doesn't work looks like.

Meanwhile fat and material rich, mentally insufficient kids on the internet and educated idiots that have never worked a real job in their lives, feel the need to constantly talk down our great nation. They have the gaul to try and decide how the world should work when they cannot handle their own lives and anxieties.

I think they key criticism of CRT is that it's an ideology predicated on *racism*. At its core, it holds that certain people are less worthy or important on the basis of (white) race. A secondary criticism is that CRT then requires belief in *conflict*. When "whiteness" is seen as the enemy, a war must be waged to overcome this. However, unless we lived in a world in which white people no longer existed, this "whiteness" can always be seen as a "boogeyman" or "villain" that is the target of CRT believers.

CRT is destructive, false, and bad. It must be stopped.

"Skullford

Western civilization created the means to create affluence. It is not the whites fault that people decided to reject it and ended up with shitholes and are envious of what we have attained. We aren't just going to give you that affluence because you have less, you need to work for it. Any outsider that embraces our culture can be successful. African immigrants on average make more than most with European ancestors. That's because they are hungry and they know what living in a country that doesn't work looks like.

Meanwhile fat and material rich, mentally insufficient kids on the internet and educated idiots that have never worked a real job in their lives, feel the need to constantly talk down our great nation. They have the gaul to try and decide how the world should work when they cannot handle their own lives and anxieties."

> Western civilization created the means to create affluence. It is not the whites fault that people decided to reject it and ended up with shitholes and are envious of what we have attained.

> African immigrants on average make more than most with European ancestors. That's because they are hungry and they know what living in a country that doesn't work looks like.

> Meanwhile fat and material rich, mentally insufficient kids on the internet and educated idiots that have never worked a real job in their lives, feel the need to constantly talk down our great nation.

Contradiction much?

It is not an accident that the most prosperous European countries just so happened to formally have had colonial holdings, nor that their declines in fortune followed the loss of said colonies.

Portugal went from the richest country in the world as it navigated the globe, establishing colonies in select areas, to one stop short of a Third World joke in the latter half of the 20th Century.

We saw the same thing happen with Spain, its successor in mightiest empires.

We've witnessed the biggest empire in history go from never setting sun to one on the brink of losing Scotland and Wales in just three generations. Hate to see what will be left of the UK at the rate its going.

Likewise with the USA, whose economy has been in decline since the 1950s.

Ingenuity is one thing, and from the latter part of the 19th Century thanks to the combustion engine and electricity America took it to dizzying heights. But that would not have been possible without raw resources and those have only been running out.

Well the problem, not the contradiction, is that we have an education system set out to destroy our culture. They promote jobs that create nothing and people that do nothing. Globalism and free trade also has ruined the enterprising spirit in favor of outsourced slave labor.

Another issue is that we don't seem to want to adapt capitalism to the new age. We keep talking about socialism and communism as cure for our problems instead of looking for capitalist solutions. What is the purpose of capitalism? Ownership and rewarding the competent. Our healthcare system, our housing situation and manufacturing are all going the wrong direction.

Lastly we have a popular culture that supports and amplifies the basest, filthiest, the most nontraditional, and the least thoughtful forms of entertainment⁹. We also have turned politics into entertainment and a sports game where you have teams and not individual opinions.

So the solutions are simple. End free trade. Open our minds about things that aren't traditional if they support the bigger picture of capitalism. This is why I like Andrew Yang. UBI and Universal Healthcare may actually be better for capitalism than what we have now. We need to reject all forms of the rental economy that is being created. I guarantee when self driving cars come out we will have to pay monthly for the service. What a nonsense elitist system. We might as well go back to slavery. We need to stop supporting people breeding as well. This shit is unsustainable. We just did the opposite with these paychecks to breeders. And we need a more thoughtful and less tribalistic/animalistic citizenry.

Liberty, Fraternity, Equality, Industry, Wisdom. We need to get back to principles and get away from this low level and thoughtless "justice" that is making the world a worse place.

har dee har har, you're pulling my leg so hard just to see if I notice.

Everything you've said is followed by a contradiction, sometimes within the same sentence.

Capitalism IS the free trade, it adapts via market forces, namely pressures exerted by supply and demand. It is shaped by the marketplace.
You claim to save it we need massive regulation to the point of alteration, handing out more freebies, yet cutting off said freebies for those who need it the most because they can't afford it.

You claim education is destroying culture then you advocate destroying culture not to your liking. 'Decadent and degenarate' culture and art is something a certain former Chancellor of Germany once harped on before waging war on Europe eight decades ago.

Politics has become religion in recent years, this rabid cult has now turned affiliation into actual racial identity, or even speciation, where somehow membership is genetically predisposed.

No one is preventing you from having whatever principles. If you need permission to steer your own course, then you're missing the point and have chosen to be a slave to a mentality of the most base sort.