Caveman 2024

But Neanderthals did not know what elections where. And they are also a violent species that was fanatic of werfare and extreme hunting, they dont have time for "elections" specially considering they lived in small groups.

Even a Neanderthal knows not to drive without calling Geico first.

You dare comoare us to those violent/ xenophobic orcs?

But Neanderthals did not know what Geico is. And they are also a violent species that was fanatic of werfare and extreme hunting, they dont have time for "driving" specially considering they did not move around much and stayed in one zone.

;P

He didn’t call Texans Neanderthal for opening up their economy, dummy.

But you did proceed to worship and defend Neandeethals, a violent and different species, when he made the insult.

Homo sapien are the most violent, though. We have killed more people than any other human species.

Humans dont fight their prey up close. Humans arent masculine. Humans dont compete physically with other males for females. Humans arent naturaly xenophobic and anti social. Humans are not dogmatic or neophobic by default.

Neanders are all of those and more.

Gonna respond or what??? Am waitinf

First of all, human species dont exist bevause Humans are a species: ours.
Second, call our species HUMANS, not homo sapiens.
Third, Neanderthals are more violent and aggresive than Humans, because:
-Neanderthals have a more muscular body, evolved for combat and hunting.
-Neanderthals where carnivores, unlike humans who are omnivores.
-Neanderthals where anti social, xenophobic and territorial isolasionists. As a result they lived in tiny groups and hated strangers.
-Neanderthals where masculine and used extreme hunting methods.
-The Neanderthal genome was found to cause humans to become more aggresive and depressed. Europeans being the biggest example.
-Neanderthals where promiscous and competitve for females.
-Neanderthals killed their prey on hand to hand combat, being fanatics of physical aggresion.
-Male neanderthals r@ped female humans, kidnapping them using their strenght to kidnap them and fight off members of their tribes.

Fourth, the aggression levels of a species depend on several factors like social structures, brain structure, behavioural traits, adaptations, etc. Our species is less aggresive than Neanders because we are more social and more designed to social than to hunt.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47873072

That chart is wrong:
-Homo Habilis and Homo Rudolfensis are the same species, with the size difference being the result of sexual dimorphism. And they are not part of Homo as they are too primitive and ape-like, they belong in their own genus.
-Homo Heidelbergensis where esrly Neanderthals.
-Homo Erectus is not a valid species as all fossils and subspecies associated with it are different hominins, many either belonging to their own genera or part of an already discovered species.

"Homo Habilis and Homo Rudolfensis are the same species"

"And they are not part of Homo as they are too primitive and ape-like, they belong in their own genus."

Same species, different genus?
Yeah, um, I'mmo stick with what the anthropologists say rather than the contadictory musings of a Lord of the Ring video game fan.

Anthropologist once said that no dinosaur had feathers and that T rex walked tail dragging. Jack Horner, a paloentologist, thinks that T. Rexes where scavengers. You cant always "trust the experts". What am telling you is based on anatomical and fossil evidence. Ape like creatures like H. Habilis cannot be part of Homo.
And H. Habilis and "H. Rudolfensis" look almost identical except for size differences and minor anatomical details. They are the same species in its own genus.

No Anthropologist said that ever because Anthropologists study species of man, not dinosaurs.

You are not an expert. You don't even know the proper names of the fields.

The first two dinosaurs that were identified as having feathers - including the incredible Takinga dumpasaurus AKA Poopysauraus wretch - turned out to be hoaxes, the feathers etched into the stone. From the first time I saw the photo back then, I questioned why the darker rock betwixt its legs (hence "TakingADumpaSaurus"). Turned out the feather imprints were faked and it was a composite made from remains far apart of not even the same species.
Numerous 'finds' in China turn out to be fakes, from altered fossils to ancient pottery to Morgan Silver Dollars.
Doesn't mean dinosaurs didn't have feathers - even crocodiles have a gene utilized in feather making - but that the 1st 2 were hoxes but the rest are real is suspect

Homo Habilis is called Homo Habilis because that's what it is.

Perhaps you should stick with your Xbox,,,

Still with the same bs obsession?

Neanderthals were a species of human driven to extinction by sapiens.
They were real, not "Orcs" from Lord of the Rings as you claim. That's not science. It's not even Sci Fi. It's Fantasy, mkay? Fantasy.

We are humans not sapiens. And no humans never wiped them out. They died out thanks to climate change, inbreeding, and failed competition with humans.

This is what Neanderthals where like. Violent, barbaric, xenophobic orcs who went to war with humans.

Neanderthals. were. real.
They. were. not. Lord. of. the. Ring. video. game. characters.

Food was never scarce in the places where Neanderrhals live. Also those humans in WW1 tended to live in groups of hundreds of individuals while Neanderthal clans consistent of 10-20 individuals, most of them being related by blood. Unlike humans who tend to befriend strangers

They are orcs. That pic is innacurate. The nose must be larger and chubbier. The eyes must be bigger. The face must be elongated and the body must be more robust.

No, they are not Orcs. Orcs are fantasy creatures from Lord of the Rings. They've never existed, at least not outside comics, movies, and video games.

Dont you know what a metaphor or slang term is??? Orc is sometimes used to refer to extremely aggresive, masculine or ruthless individuals. And Neamderthals, based on their anatomy behaviour and hunting methods, where a ruthless and violently barbaric species.

Sorry but that reconstruction is innacurate. The eyes need to be larger and the nose needs to be bigger and rounder. The face must also be more elongated. Also they must have large barrel-shaped bodies and be muscular.

I triggered you…..

Nope. You are the triggered one. As you betrayed you species to defend some extonct xenos by saying that we are more aggresive when in reality Neanderthals are more aggresive. And worst of all you call them "humans". They aint human bruh.

Are you talking about real Neanderthals or video game Neanderthals?

They are the same thing: Violent, xenophobic, carnivorous, promiscous warlords.

There are no species of human because humans ARE A SPECIES. Neanderthals are not humans. And they where neber droven to extinction by humans. They went extinct as a result of competion amd warfare with humans and climate change.

And they are SIMILAR to the orcs from WARCRAFT, Not Lord of the Rings. WARCRAFT. Dont you know what WARCRAFT is? And I never used it for science, I used to show the similarities between orcs and neanderthals. Like the violence and xenophobia.

No.

You have to separate yourself from this fixation with literal comic book video game fantasy. It's not productive.

And you have to separate from this fixiation of trying to compare us humans to those violent barbarians known as Neanderthals. We are not the same and we will never be.

they read the archaeological and fossil evidence as indicating that Neanderthals were xenophobic, resistant to change and dogmatic — direct, but also laconic and unimaginative. The lack of imagination is shown, for instance, in their unchanging tool designs; wariness and xenophobia are indicated by their high mortality rate and interpersonal violence; and their laconic approach is suggested by the fact that they rarely travelled out of their home territory...................

Yeah, real different - stouter to deal with colder climes, including shorter legs more adept at trudging though deep snow but at the expense of long distance running which sucks if they wanted to be in the Olympics. More muscular for more direct, closer methods of killing bigger prey.
Oh, and bigger brains because they had to do it all on the spot rather than relying on someone else picking up the slack should they foul up, a trend that only continues to get worse with modern humans.

No links.

https://www.nature.com/articles/479294a

This study says am right.

No links STILL.

And no, you're not.

I gave you a link bruh. That a scientific article.

You keep repeating the same lies. You don't even know the meaning of some of the words you use, let alone the lack of logic in using them. Xenophobic, dogmatic, laconic.......

Its all here: https://www.nature.com/articles/479294a

That's nice.
It was still a book review, and you're using that as the basis of your misinformed illogical fantasies.

A book with accurate and possible information on Neanders, far better compared to how many modern anthropologists try to anthropomorphise and worship Neanderthals. Unlike the "NEANDERTHALS ARE LIKE US" people, the author of the book studies Neanderthals without bias, awknowledges behavioural differences, connects the dots, carefully analyzes de evidence and looks for alternate explanations. Thats real science, not "NEANDERTHALS WHERE NOT SO DIFFERENT FROM US". Like bruh Neanderthals are different from us in anatomy and behaviour, and many of their behaviours are not positive.

Yes, you did give me a link.
And STILL I STILL don't do links STILL.

Links are needed to provide evidence. Something you never do.

No, your link wasn't for a scientific article, it was a book review. It mentioned some of it's points briefly with no detail.

Here's 2 maps of your "xenophobic" Neanderthals who "stayed within their territory."
Looks li some mixing with Denisovans occurred when they reached them in Siberia.

When Sapiens settled into the Middle East 100,000ya, there was also an ongoing xchange with Neandethals, even culturally, as seen with tool making, for example. Eventually Sapiens disappeared from the area.

-Nature is a scientific website. And thw book was written by a paleontologist with valid evidence for his points.

-Neanderthaks rarely travelled from their home territory, only venturing out when searching for a new home or when a new clan forms and tries ti settle somewhere else. Naturally dont move around that much. They are xenophobic because they dont tolerate other clans and dislike strangers, like lion prides. Hybridization with Denisovans was rare, and there where most likely warfare betwene Neanderthals and Denisovans too combined with competition.

-There was no exchange. Neanderthals where dogmatic, uncreative,never change their tech and most likely copycated what humans did. Also they dont change culture with anyone because they are xenophobic and hate humans. Humans and Neanderthals are natural enemies.

All your claims are anthropomorphism and your idiolized idea of those cavemen.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101103081915.htm

Proof

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/neanderthals-lack-drawing-ability-may-relate-hunting-techniques

Y'all got out cheated. Raise your game if you want to win again. I doubt you see a Republican in office again for 20 years.

Free but unfair elections....big cities Democrats corruption

y'all better learn to cheat better or you ain't never gonna have another Republicant in office. Ever. As an independent voter I hope you figure that shit out quick or there may not be a country left to run.

Nah, when they shut down next time and the trucks pull up we gonna Antifa the building.

We are less aggresive. Neanderthals are violent and barbaric carnivorous orcs who went to war woth humans and r@ped human females.

That’s not a Neanderthal…

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101103081915.htm

Neandeethals where more violent and competed for mates. They where NOT monogamous.

It is
They are violent and xenophobic orc warlords.

Real Neanderthals?

Response to Modd: Food was never scarce in the places where Neanderrhals live. Also those humans in WW1 tended to live in groups of hundreds of individuals while Neanderthal clans consistent of 10-20 individuals, most of them being related by blood. Unlike humans who tend to befriend strangers.

Um, no.

Humans are more similar to Bonobos while Neanders are more similar to Chimps. Humans like Bonobos tend yo befriend strangers, be less aggresive and are a gracile species. Neanderthals,like chimps tend to be more aggresive, territorial, attack strangers and are a robust species.

ORCS! Fantasy characters from Lord of the Rings!

I’m letting him write whatever he wants because he’s funny

aye

At least I dont worship xe os nor try to put my species down over another.

they read the archaeological and fossil evidence as indicating that Neanderthals were xenophobic, resistant to change and dogmatic — direct, but also laconic and unimaginative. The lack of imagination is shown, for instance, in their unchanging tool designs; wariness and xenophobia are indicated by their high mortality rate and interpersonal violence; and their laconic approach is suggested by the fact that they rarely travelled out of their home territory.

Neanderthals went to war with humans

Yup. Neanserthals where violent and xenophobic. Hence why the had a lot of muscle. They also lived in small family-based groups. Meaning they did not tolerate strangers. Making them xenophobic.

Ok.

Bunch of totally unfounded contradictory nonsense, disputing science with Lord of the Ring video game Fantasy characters. Ok, sure.

Claiming they were promiscuous and not monogamous in one post, then saying they lived in small family-based groups.
Yes, they lived in small family-based groups, just like modern humans in harsh northern climes till after WWII. You can't have large societies when food is scarce. No major civilizations were born in the north for a reason.

https://halfsigma.typepad.com/half_sigma/2010/05/evil-neanderthals-raped-human-women.html

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/neanderthals-lack-drawing-ability-may-relate-hunting-techniques

Male Neanderthals r@ped female humans!!! Evidence by how physocally stronger male Neanders are while female humans are weaker than the weak male humans, allowing male neanders to drag them to their caves to diddle them!!

It could not be the opposite as Neanderthals were way stronger than us, as such a Neanderthal female would kill a Human male who tried to rape her, and possibly eat him for lunch.

Neanders are not like us, they are monsters.

👽👽👽

Wdym???

Well they are xenos

I think everyone was xeno back then

Nope. Xenos refers to any species that is not our own. Dinosaurs, aliens Neanderthals. Basically any species that is not human is a xeno.

They ate them, too

Who ate who???

Reptilians

Bruh you are starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist. Am telling you this so you and other republicans stop worshipping Neanderthals and calling them saints shen they are not.

Brah you’re the one talking about orcs and monsters….

That’s dumb.

Am using Warcraft orcs as a basis of how Neanderthals behaved. Because am sick of Republicans and other people worshipping then and praising them as saints when Neanderthals clearly attacked and even r@ped their ancestors. How could you even believe that us more-social and gracile humans be more aggressive than those anti-social, xenophobic, robust orcs with their big muscles and violent hunting methods??

Good grief, what is this, 1880?

What makes you think that??

People always get tired of the person in office. The rising prices will annoy everyone enough to want to elect a new president by 2024.

At this stage it won't be a Republican't Hell you guys can't even rig a vote right.

And that's a bad thing? XD