[some oofs require a whole new template]

investigating Benghazi- brilliant- we had to get to the bottom of what really happened
January 6th- waste of time and money, and we DONT want to get to what really happened- it will hurt our reelection efforts!

So we can't investigate something on our own? Because we all know what liberals will say "we did an investigation and found that everyone at the capitol was a conservative."

They weren't conservative, they were trump suppoters. Those are mutually exclusive categories.

A Trump supporter is most likely a conservative.

trump supporters may think they're conservative, but they aren't. Their identities are wrong.

*Trump.

You can be against a fake bipartisan commission that allows Pelosi to pick all the investigative staff to cover and democratic culpability and use the “investigation” like the Russian collusion 3 year lie and try to dump bombshells prior to the election. Only a fool would go along with that.

Your argument: “Democrats, Democrats, blah blah blah, boo boo”

C’mon man. The heart of American self-government was attacked. Congress already fell down on its ass by failing to convict the person directly responsible in impeachment even though his term was already up by the time the trial happened, so it was hilariously low-stakes.

The least that can be done is to study what happened, how it happened, and what went wrong and how to make sure it never happens again.

Don’t worry, I’m sure there will be LENGTHY sections on the multiple system failures of the “Democrat-controlled” Capitol Hill police as well. So score all the partisan points you think you can off of that to distract from the fact that you support the most treasonous political movement since the Confederacy.

👍👏

Hmmm, seems like a good argument for a bipartisan election investigation as well. We can have a Republican chair and he will pick all the investigative staff. Sound good? After all fair elections are the heart of our democracy. With so many questioning election integrity it would be good to spend a couple years investigating accusations.

The point is a real bipartisan committee to investigate both things would be in the interest of the people if the staff chosen were not partisan in their beliefs or grinding a political axe.

Saying they carry assault rifles and attacked the capitol doesn’t denote separation and it’s done on purpose to hype the “insurrection” narrative
>> Not true, it does denote separation. If they were meant to be combined I would say "and then attacked." So, nice try there, bucko.

Just as screaming “he was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher” is a lie used to hype the same narrative. Get the facts straight liar.
>> So, what did he die of? Because you're saying that he didn't die of this, and yet ... you fail to cite what he died of.

Left wing terrorism easy to find. Capitol police officer killed by a BLM supporter who drove his car into a barricade. TDS sufferers who walked into a grocery store and started shooting people. These happened in the last few months nutjob.
>> Right wing terrorism is easier to find. :)

Supporting our enemies? You mean like radical Islam.
>> Who supports Radical Islam?
People roaming the streets of America screaming allahu akbar?
>> Never heard anyone doing this. Even so, what's wrong with saying Allahu Ackbar? Oh right, that's a prejudiced trope with regard to islam. White Supremacists often use this trope #facts

Democrats support that.
>> Islam? We support all religions.

What a travesty to the troops who fought died and are fighting those people abroad.
>> Have family who served in Afghanistan and Iraq. They don't condemn the entirety of those who follow Islam as you seem to.

Supporting Russian pipelines over American pipelines? How about protecting China from blame for the virus like you Faucists.
>> Ah, you're doing the Shapiro move, say so much bullshit you have to write a novel to prove why it's wrong. And since when is "Facusist" a thing? Lol. Who's the deranged one here? Not me, making up words lol.

I’ll never understand people like you that support critical race theory and think their skin color makes them evil and they have to apologize for it. We have achieved equality under the law and that is why most people prosper in this country, even immmigrants.
>> You mean the immigrants that people want to deport even though they're legal? People wanting to change the laws so Dreamers can't prosper here? Tsk tsk tsk. You're so shallow and you can't even see it. Opening the borders for unlimited immigration sure seems like a replacement strategy and weak kneed communists like you are the enemy within.
>> Replacement theory? You mean that *literal* white supremacist theory?
You seem triggered. Stop it. Get help.

Stop defending your buddies, terrorist.

Diaz’s ruling does not mean Sicknick was not assaulted or that the violent events at the Capitol did not contribute to his death. The medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”

The Capitol Police said in its statement that the ruling “does not change the fact Officer Brian Sicknick died in the line of duty, courageously defending Congress and the Capitol.” The agency said it will “never forget Officer Sicknick’s bravery, nor the bravery of any officer on January 6, who risked their lives to defend our democracy.”

Too bad you weren’t concerned about defending the integrity of the elections. Remember, a riot is the language of the unheard. The officer died of a stroke so obviously he was not well. It might still have happened if he was sitting on his couch. Anything else is speculation.

Coroner is not convinced he would have had a stroke if he wasn't exposed to the extreme stress. I'll follow the professional's opinion who confirmed he died of a stroke, which was brought on by the stressful ordeal he went through, rather than listen to a couch/armchair coroner who has never even seen the body.
Speculate all you want.

Elections are safe.
Courts Confirmed
Supreme Courts Confirmed
DoD Confirmed.
DoHS Confirmed.
FBI Confirmed.
FEC Confirmed.
Sen Maj Ldr McConnell even calls it a conspiracy.

Go away with your conspiracy theories :)

Biden won. Get over it.

I'm getting a 404 from your "evidence."

"They admitted to illegally using the media to ensure a “proper outcome” they brag about it."

Substantiate that with a link.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/media/time-mag-report-touting-cabal-of-of-powerful-people-behind-conspiracy-shadow-campaign-to-shape-election.amp

Nor can he say he had one because of it. He can only speculate. Follow the science. The point is you claimed he was beaten to death and that is most certainly a hyped up lie to evoke an overreaction. Stressful ordeals are part of the police officers job. That’s what they do. It’s sad he died as it is for any people who died during any of the riots throughout the year.

Stop with your racist whataboutisms.

"Nope it’s true, read it."

I have read up on it. You're wrong.

Critical race theory asks us to consider how we can transform the relationship between race, racism, and power and work toward the liberation of People of Color. Who, in fact, do experience racism from the government, police officers, and everyday citizens.

You confuse racism and prejudice. We have equality under the law. Identifying whote people as oppressors is racist as is identifying POC as victims. Everyone has prejudices including POC. Some even promote black melanoid supremacy like Nick cannon and several BLM leaders.

Really? Being a BLM activist myself, I've never heard of these people until now. Or even this practice.

See, I already know that people have predispositions that everyone needs to work on. There is a college that sheds light on this.. No one special.. Probably nothing you've heard of /s. It's Harvard University? I think? Anyway, they give out an implicit bias/racism test. Most right-wingers refuse to take them because they can't face the hard truth that they have implicit bias/racism.

Right wing thinks there's only stark "white" racism. By "white" I mean clear-cut epithets.

Beyond that they have no f**king idea, sadly.

Anyway I took this test, understood how it worked, agreed to it, and it turned out (this was in 2015) that I did have some implicit bias. Ever since then I've worked diligently to overcome it. I think I have for the most part. Though I am always open to my biases and prejudices re-evaluated if I am accused of racism, and will apologize if my words had an unintended negative effect.

Having been on both sides of the fence and having once agreed to the "All Lives Matter" Slogan before it became popular, I'm not really racist as I understand how the ignorant mind of white folk work in America. Again, having experienced it myself, witnessed it myself, from both sides of the spectrum.

Racism is not so simple as to strictly be defined in a binary construct.

You may be a BLM activist and parrot all the psychobabble from the leading leftist University in the nation, but it all comes down to your statement that quote,”I understand how the ignorant mind of white folk work in America”. In that single statement you expose your bias. What do you need to take from me to make you whole? Why do I owe it to you because of my skin color? Why do you believe you are inferior and need extra help? I don’t believe you are and I don’t believe you really think you are. It’s convenient to the narrative but it is false.

"You may be a BLM activist and parrot all the psychobabble from the leading leftist University in the nation, but it all comes down to your statement that quote,”I understand how the ignorant mind of white folk work in America”. In that single statement you expose your bias. What do you need to take from me to make you whole? Why do I owe it to you because of my skin color? Why do you believe you are inferior and need extra help? I don’t believe you are and I don’t believe you really think you are. It’s convenient to the narrative but it is false."

You're doing it again, the fallacy of contextomy.

If you're going to hold argument, do so in good faith. Don't start resorting to your intentionally fallacious arguments. I don't have time for losers who can't compose an argument and instead take shortcuts that are easily debunked and thus a waste of time. It just so happens, you're so good at them... I really must congratulate you on your ability to weave them together to make such compelling arguments; you're really quite creative. But they never work. And they never will. So stop trying.

When I say, "ignorant mind of white folk" I am referring to a specific demographic: those who are uninformed. Ignorance is not a crime. Ignorance among whites *is* a thing. Deal with it.

Harvard is a globally recognized university it its prestige - that's a fact.

I can safely say that Harvard is more credible than you are.

But that's none of my business.

I would as a prestigious university that leads in the propagation of leftist propaganda. Once again your statement is that white folk are ignorant, that’s racist plain and simple you are a racist you fail to recognize your own racism while condemning others for their‘s.

⬆️ Ipse dixit.

Lpse? What's that

Duh, now prove your statement

What statement?

Ipse dixit

1/

"https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/an-overdue-conversation-about-black-on-asian-violence"

Ah, an opinion piece... *click*
First paragraph cites *one* incident by a black man, then follows up with "attacks" in Seattle, San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles, and New York, each with a link.

*Click San Francisco.* Ah, a CNN Article. Doesn't state whether the man is black or white... Quote from the article:
"In fact, Stop AAPI (Asian American Pacific Islander) Hate has received more than 2,800 firsthand reports of anti-Asian hate across 47 states and Washington, DC, since March 19." 47 States. I wonder how many states have an African-American majority to make your claim likely to be true... Here's a hint: Not many. African-Americans make up ~15% of the USA population. Oh look, in the attached video, a white guy even says "Trump is gonna F*** you. You need to leave." So, we have confirmed MAGAt being racist. Can't tell whether the black guy spraying febreeze is D/R though. But we have confirmed Trumpists being Trumpists. Er. Racist.

*Click Oakland*
Ah, an Article "‘Is It Really Republican Racists Doing This?’: Tucker, Ying Ma Take On ‘Lie’ That Attacks On Asians Are Trump-Inspired" Well, the previous article already debunked what this article claims. Not to mention it's Carlson, known white supremacist.

*Click Los Angeles*
Okay, it's talking about how Asian-Hate crimes have doubled... Does not cite or source any information that suggests the perpetrators are predominately white or black... So far the sources your article is drawing from is not conclusive to your point that it is African-Americans doing these crimes as you allege.

*Click New York*
Paywall. Next

*Click Seattle*
Citing the EXACT same article as Oakland. That's just lazy writing. As a writer, I would've found a different source to talk about Seattle. But, that's just me.

The Article goes on to cite a compilation of Data, dated from 2018 (A lot happened between 2018 and 2020... The context for racial hate crimes could have changed and the article even admits that this data is incomplete and not to be taken as attribution to current Anti-Asian Hate crimes, but something from which we can extrapolate data. This extrapolation is flawed as I said, much has happened in those two years...

Even then, the data states that of the Asians who suffered hate crimes, 24.1% were done by whites, 24.1% done by other Asian Americans, and 27% were done by African-Americans.

Hilarious that you site it isn’t stated what race. That’s because leftists don’t allow you to see the truth, but it’s out there and even the asians know it.

Because we don't point out race because we aren't racist.

Color doesn't matter. To you, it obviously does, racist.

Stop with your baseless accusations. That's enough out of you, troll.

What baseless accusation? I called
You what you are.

You're right.
And you're a white supremist, a QAnon conspirator and a liar. Thereby making me not a racist as you're a liar.

Hahah you demand no one identify the attackers and then say there’s no proof what race they were. Yet you insinuate that it is white supremists, which it is not. Recent Video evidence of numerous vile attacks on Asians by black males.

Color only matters to you if it’s white. Everything you cucks support is racist. Benefits based on skin color, critical race theory is the epitome of racism because it’s all based on the color of skin and that’s racism. Period no argument.

Yeah, no that's not what critical race theory is about. Sorry, not sorry.

As for your other claim, I won't dignify it with a retort as we've already proven your racism today. :) I'd ask that you cease your inane babble unless you actually have something constructive to bring to the table in a constructive manner. You've been nothing but toxic in this conversation since reply one. While I do enjoy running circles around you.. I'm starting to grow concerned for you and your evident addiction to spread misinformation and lies coupled with your rampant hypocrisy. Numerous points you fail to acknowledge, only bringing up red herring after red herring. I deal with them, I take them in stride, but now we're on repeat cycle. I'm not down for that, Holmes.

I won't ask again.

That is most definitely what critical race theory is. Racism plain and simple. Identifies people by skin color to assess their position.

False.

Nope it’s true, read it.

Liar.

One hardly has to be Einstein to be smarter than you.

What truth? That black people are morally inferior to white people?

That’s your statement not mine. I’m simply pointing out the fallacy of the narrative that white supremists are attacking Asians when actually more blacks are attacking Asians. Who is racist?

That was a question, not a statement. Try not to be quite so intellectually dishonest, if you can.

10 black people attacking Asians does not mean 9 white supremacists attacking Asians are no longer white supremacists.

Intellectually dishonest? So the black people who attacked Asians are black supremists? Or What proof do you have they are white supremists?

Blacks are responsible only slightly more often. But absolutely those blacks are as bad as white supremacists.

Then we agree that it’s not a white supremacy issue. Or is there proof of white supremacy in these attacks?

Even then, the data states that of the Asians who suffered hate crimes, 24.1% were done by whites, 24.1% done by other Asian Americans, and 27% were done by African-Americans.

Of course it’s “flawed”, it doesn’t agree with your false narrative. Plenty of video evidence you ignore

2/

While true that African Americans statistically make up the numerical majority of Asian Hate Crimes, virtually, the ratio is fundamentally equal. 3% is a negligible difference, according to Republican Standards.. (See Republican COVID Death Response regarding the death rate of 4-8% at its height of the pandemic.)

The article you post goes on to cite two examples were in the first example, six men beat up on one individual, and another example where two beat up on one. Naturally given the statistics mentioned above, yes, this happens. But the claim that you make, is invalid/false, stating that they are "Mostly" black. I would disagree. Mostly would not relate to a greater number that is only ahead by 3%.

Mostly would refer to BLM protests, for example. Where only 7% of protests ended in violence/riots. Thereby making them "Mostly peaceful." But then, Trump supporters with their 37% voter base insist that they're the "majority" So I don't think they understand the word "mostly."

In another link that talks about Black on Asian crime as an example, it points to some sort of town hall that was held. Of which, the content posted in that linked article cannot be verified, nor does it supply any data to go from.

So yes in the semantic context of "Mostly" is true, your claim is misleading *at best.*

Check your sources next time. Thanks for playing "You're a partisan hack." You won first place.

It contradicts your white man bad narrative that you advertise with your name lefty.

Orangemanbad- parody of the lefts disposition regarding Trump, and how he excessively uses spray on tans

Oldwhitemanbad - parody of the right wings disposition regarding Biden, and how they allege he's unfit for office due to his age, in spite of their calls for Trump to run for president in 2024 at the same age Biden did in 2020.

When you say "our," you don't mean all of us.

No, I only mean Americans who love their country

When you say "country," you only mean part of the country.

No I mean the whole country of the United States.

There are plenty of aspects of the United States and plenty of Americans you hate, you just refuse to acknowledge those aspects and those people as American. You're lying to yourself.

I only hate american that hate their country

Yep, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Only people who love your definition of "America" are not your "enemies." You denounce those Americans who want America to be different, and you define them as "communists."

Yes I define communists who want America to be communist as Commies.

I know, that's exactly what I was talking about. You define "Americans" as people like you and "enemies" as people unlike you. They denounce your "America" and you denounce their "America." Your "enemy" is a projection.

Wrong, I define Americans as all people United by love of country. Those who denounce America are enemies especially those leftists that support the slogans and dogma of communism.

"Yes I define communists who want America to be communist as Commies."

Tautology uber alles!

Why weren't you crying about democrats not having a "chair" when they were the minority? Oh right because you're a political hack; as partisan as they come

They did have some chairs. Who was in charge of Russian Collusion? Tell me which Republican was in charge? Oh yeah it was a Democrat. So your point is wrong as are most of your arguments.

Hate crimes are predominately right-wing according to the UN...
imgflip.com/i/5aiy5q?nerp=1621708069

I bet you have some authoritative source that debunks this like 4chan, or Tucker Carlson, huh? Or maybe something that skews the truth to fit your agenda. Go ahead, jump up and down and provide sources that you yourself don't check.

I'll wait.

I notice it leaves out the hate crimes perpetrated by international communism. Ask the Uighurs in China. Christians in the Middle East. The UN is not unbiased and is anti American at the least. The fact you support their every dictate proves you are partisanship. You are a leftist commie.

You don't even know what communism means lol

Sure I’ve seen plenty of it. It’s not hard you can talk to any old Eastern European or Vietnamese, Cambodian, or chinese. In addition to simple study. No doubt you promote it.

You can see the word "Communism" all you want, but still don't understand what it means or its implications.

Just like you could see the word: "Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia," read it, and not understand what it means.

I wonder how you can claim I promoted Communism when you don't know what it means?

Define communism, according to you.

Communism is a system of government where the state has all
Power and it has failed at every implementation to deliver what it promises. Lofty ideals are quickly exchanged for totalitarianism.

China would be more neo-authoritarianism and not any model of liberal/leftist governance, and certainly no where near classical liberalism. You can tell that because of all the re-education camps they have and all the thought control stuff they do.

So, your example of the Uighurs further points out that most hate crimes are committed by conservatives and authoritarian governments.

I know you won't be able to accept that because you've internalized the lie that liberalism is communism is China. But, whatever.

Also, the oppression of Christians is at the hands of religious fundamentalists (very conservative) and authoritarian states (again, conservative).

So, you thought you were scoring something sort of like a point, but you actually just played yourself.

Again.

Perhaps the word you were looking for is totalitarian?

Also a good word to use in there.

These points are fire, dope.

We need to do a series of memes explaining what the hell China’s system is — it’s not well-understood by Americans on either side of the aisle.

China is actually a fascist regime, regardless of their official propaganda which parrots Marxism but doesn’t actually follow through with it

Been meaning to do a side-by-side comparison of China and Nazi Germany, the parallels are stunning

Lmk when you do

China is a perfect indicator of what leftist government leads too. You can’t claim to be a liberal and not support free speech. Full stop

So you agree with liberals on that point?

What point? That freedom
Of speech is a foundational right and must be supported? That any liberal who doesn’t support it is not a liberal? Yes.

Except that IT isn't. (typos are an MFer.)

Then liberals cannot be communists and and communists cannot be liberals.

A true American liberal supports free speech And loves his country. The current progressive Leftist are most definitely Marxist and not liberals

Isnt what?

Stop lying. Trey Gowdy (R) and Rob Goodlatte (R) where the chairs of House Judiciary and House Oversight.

Feel free to prove me wrong though. With sources.
https://www.businessinsider.com/subpoena-for-cambridge-analytica-brad-parscale-trump-russia-investigation-2017-12

In the 116th congress that would have covered the majority of the Mueller investigation and its publication as well as the election fraud, the leader of House Judiciary was Jerry Nadler and Elijah Cummings was succeeded by Carolyn Maloney, both Democrats, on House Oversight. This is easily checked without posting a link.

So again, why weren't you crying for democrats to have a chair before before the 116th congress? When they wanted to launch the Mueller investigation in the first place? Back then, it was Trey Gowdy and Rob Goodlatte in 2017 when Nadler and Cummings were working to get more information in the 115th Congress. The idea to ever investigate what happened in an official capacity was never accepted. Not until the 116th congress.

So yes, while what you said is accurate, it doesn't reflect the counter-argument I am making against your "Democrats are partisan hacks because they have the chair QQ." As you lend yourself to your own hypocrisy.

I’m not the one screaming for a commission you are. I simply pointed out that Pelosi wants to use her power to appoint all democrat investigators because her goal isn’t truth. She has exemplified the definition of partisan hacks and has no concern for truth, her goal is promoting the Democratic Party of hate.

When did I scream? Stop lying. That's big talk calling democrats the party of hate when nazi flags and confederate flags are often found at pro Trump rallies. Anti lgbtq+ rights, anti legal immigration, anti asian americans.

Lol what a simpleton..

Who are the people attacking Asians? The ones I’ve seen are mostly black. Oh, I get it they must be Republican blacks so they ain’t black according to your dementia patient leader.
>> Prove it. Put up or shut up.

Attacked the capitol with assault rifles?
>> Never said that, shill. I said they carry assault rifles, (separate) AND assaulted our capitol.)
When did that happen you lying hypocrite bullshitter?
>> Just now, in your deranged mind :) It's really funny to watch you sweat so hard to try and put me down only to make yourself look more stupid than the last time you posted.

You were screaming about the lie, “the officer was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher!”
>> I wonder how many officers were hurt that day? So, in your infinitesimally small brain, what did he die of?
Ya like everything you say it was a lie used to gin up idiots like you that will repeat the lie even once disproven.
>> Lol says the biggest consumer of right-wing propaganda with the "STOP THE STEAL."
And by that, I do mean, stop the squeal.

Death threats? Like the leftist that shot up the Republican baseball practice?
>> Or the capitol rioters who were going to hang Mike Pence? Kill Pelosi or AOC or any other member of congress who didn't jive with their agenda. I wonder which is easier, finding right-wing terrorism or left wing terrorism. Interestingly enough, right-wing terrorism is the highest it has ever been since the 1950s, completely dwarfing the left-wing terrorism in the early 1970s. The difference being, that with left-wing terrorism typically resorted to property damage against environmental entities that dealt with deforestation or animal slaughterhouses. With Right-wing terrorism though, it's far more common to find mass shootings, bombs, etc. Let's face it, you guys are just more violent. Period.

You may be an adult but you are not wise. Your pretty dead from the neck up. Take some of those old guy vitamins for your brain function.

You really believe supporting our countries enemies is a good policy? I think people like you are the enemy of reality.
>> This coming from a right-wing terrorist. Why do you hate America so much that you have to fight against Liberty? Why do you have to be so set against people of color? Why do you have to be so set against progression? Why do you choose to be so small?

I'll never understand people like you. To be so filled with hate and fear to believe that Replacement Theory is a thing. LOL only a smooth brain believes that.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/an-overdue-conversation-about-black-on-asian-violence

Actually, no she doesn't. She passed a bipartisan commision. The chair is appointed by the Democrats and the Vice Chair by the Republicans.

Who appoint the staff? Take a guess. The chair does. Who does the chair answer to? Pelosi. There is nothing bipartisan about it. It is meant to give a Russia collusion style 3 year investigation to drop propaganda turds from before elections.

Wow, way to project, racist apologizer.

You must have serious liberal derangement syndrome if you think the left are the nazis when Republicans literally hang out with the neo nazi party. I sense you're getting triggered.

Private intimidation armies like the guys who actually carry assault rifle and assault our countries capitol because they hate America so much? Or the all of the GOP congressmen and women you had the government censure, coupled with all of the death threats the already receive for speaking out against a corrupt, tyrannical politician? Or how about all of the anti Asian hate Trump spurred up? Anti Asian crime is up by 140% because of the rhetoric used. While your mischaracterizations of the left are noted, even if they were true, which they aren't....

Your hypocrisy is showing, shill.

Sit down, the adults are talking.