murderer

So a black cop shoots a white woman for jumping through a window and gets no charges?

Its not just a window. It is the capital building...

Ya and there were armed helmeted officers right next to her. Shooting unarmed protestors no matter where in the people’s house is unacceptable. She was not a deadly threat so deadly force was not justified just because you don’t like her politics.

Go crawl over a military fence, see what happens. Same sign, sir

So when they broke into the congressional offices to spit on representatives over the Kavanaugh case you would have been ok if they just opened fire to stop them? I bet you wouldn’t.

Military base isn’t the peoples house and I’m pretty sure that if they shot an unarmed girl who jumped the fence there would be hell to pay. Face it, you don’t like her politics so you approve of murdering an unarmed woman.

Please.

Who is they? How many? Kavanugh case? There wasnt a case for kavanugh, it was a confirmation.

You are right, I disagree with tantrums, lies, and discourse. Had there had been a mob, (it wasnt a mob was it?), they would have reacted at the same threat level...key word, threat level.

Let's look at the duante wrights case, he was a felon with a warrant. That officer had every right to have a weapon on her hand, sheknew his record once she pulled him up and found the warrent. Violent criminal, on record.

Now, let's take a woman crawling through a broken window of "THE PEOPLES HOUSE", no license to run, nothing but a threat determination, BANG.

If those on perimeter duty shot an unarmed woman for jumping the fence. There would be an uproar, especially if she was black.

“Protesters pound the doors of the Supreme Court following Kavanaugh confirmation U.S. Capitol Police said a total of 164 people were arrested during the protests for "crowding, obstructing, or incommoding."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna917351

"Police eventually were able to form a line between the door and the group of protesters and later shepherded them back down the steps before erecting a barricade."

So where is the difference? You tell me. I will help, the barricades were already in place on Jan 6.

Was she killed at the police line? What I saw is she was in a hallway milling around with police and protestors and she attempted to jump through the window. No warning nothing shouted just bang. Unarmed people should be a clear and present danger to life or limb before deadly force is applied regardless of whether they are Republican or Democrat or independent or non political. If you can’t hold the standard for all it’s not a standard, if you’re ok with murder against those you disagree with then you are a hypocrite,

With respect, I stopped reading at police line . The "FRONT WAS BROKEN". There was no LINE.

I am starting to understand how much understanding of a front you have.

Lets look at the front line from the other side.

Crazy mob, crawling through a broken window. You, as a capital police officer, and your customer(the congressmen and women) are in the same hallway, and all you are hearing is STOP THE STEAL, STOP THE STEAL. Perhaps a review of the video evidence may give you an insight.

Did the line advance after that?

😉😇

I was being sarcastic, obviously she was not killed at a police line. She was in a hallway full of helmeted police officers. There is a video of the incident and it gives a a good view of what happened. She was murdered by a trigger happy cop for jumping through a window.

Get it yet?

Nope, I get that it’s ok by you guys to kill People whose politics you don’t like

Not hardly, sir.

It's acceptable if the mob has murderous intent. And that mob's intent was obvious.

Who did they murder? Nope she was not a physical threat to the officer at the time. She was unarmed.

They were already assaulting officers with intent to kill, or at least to commit GBH.

She wasn’t, she was milking around in a hallway with a mixture of protestors and officers and no one was fighting from what I saw on the kill Video that you leftists celebrate.

There are parts of the Capitol not open to the general public and certainly not open to a murderous mob.

Face it you only approve of the use of deadly force for people who lean right and repudiate your Minnedishu values. Cops are authorized to use deadly force but you don’t support that. So if a 12 year old crossed the “Kill line” at the capitol you are ok with killing him. That’s stupid.

The signs say different. Have you ever read one IRL? It is pretty threatening. Sorry those idiots didnt heed the warning.

I've seen plenty of them, they usually say something like DEADLY FORCE AUTHORIZED.

Yes they do 👍

Yep. And as a career DOD employee I've spent most of my working life in places that had those signs. And you don't want to play stupid games with the people enforcing the law there.

Nope, everyday is training day, you are not kidding.

I had clearance to cross an active runway from the tower, was witnessed by an SP on the flight line, was quickly lit up, hands on out of the truck, and subdued on the ground with the business end of an M16 at the base of my skull, until they cleared my authorization with the tower. Had I had been climbing over a fence, BANG.

It was a mistake, obviously, as I had clearance.

In a situation such as this, no one to check on authorization of visitation...BANG.

I get it.

Police are authorized to use deadly force yet you don’t support them.

So children who crossed the kill line should be executed because there is a sign?

There was child shot on federal land?

Not yet but according to your deadly force authorized argument if one goes into the wrong area you are ok with shooting them because there’s a sign.

Officer's discretion. The sign says AUTHORIZED, not MANDATORY. Sheesh.

Great point.

Is he alone, or is he leading a whole group of people chanting hate rhetoric?

Is dropping the kid going to stop the rest of the mob? Yup. And that is why if she would have been allowed to enter, she would not have been the last. That mob was closer than 30 feet to congressmen amd women. Not another single person attempted to enter through that window again, proving why deadly force was authorized.

She showed no aggression and therefore should not have been shot, there was no proclamation declaration or warning from the officer that if you come through the window I will shoot. There are countless videos of people in the capitol milling about and officers milling around asking them to leave. This wasn’t a rush at the doorway and there were police 10 feet away in the same room with her.

The simple act of crawling into the window is an act of aggression, it was an advancement of a threat, regardless.of the FORM OF THE THREAT (child with a bomb strapped to it, walking mindless into it's own destruction... you can buy the mindlessness for the middle east, but not the western world). Wow.

Bullsheet, she wasn’t a threat and she had no weapons. So would the acts of aggression against federal property and officers committed nightly in what is truly an insurrection in Portland and Seattle not merit deadly force?

Antifa and crisis actors

You have a hard time with reality. The list keeps growing, wea re at 414 charges.

So, out of the first 300 arrested, more than 10% of which were republicans, and they didnt even vote. Now we see the vote was stolen, the cheetoh said it was fixed, no use for voting, and they didnt.

Let's look at ratio of antifa to Proud boys/oath keepers:
Well so far antifa had 1 guy.

Let's just call the first 300 as proud boys, that is 300/1.

Let's go for the whole remaining 114 out of 414 is antifa, that's 300/114. Majority 3/1 are clown supporters.

Those damned crises actors! You need a new tin foil hat, this one isn't working.

And this is surprise why?

Deadly force AUTHORIZED.

Damn right. She was killed by her own stupidity.

No she was killed by a cop. You go ahead and justify Killing unarmed people because they don’t support your politics hypocrite. If that was a Minnesota CIP we would all know it was just his incompetence.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

So you support the shooting of the 13 year old in Chicago, based on that statement.

There's not enough available information on that one yet.

Sure there is. It was 3:30am and he was with a known latin Kings gangster shooting at cars. When the police showed he ran with a gun in his hand. I’d say that’s a stupid game