Indeed

my brother loved biden so much that he voted for him 22 times fair and square

lmao

XD

Liberals in 2016: “Russia hacked our voting system!” Donald Trump did some sort of Russia Collusion thing!”

Liberals in 2020: “There is absolutely no way our voting system can be hacked. Totally secure! You are all conspiracy theorists!”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections#:~:text=In%20the%20July%202018%20indictment,election%20boards%2C%20and%20secretaries%20of

It’s Wikipedia, so it must be true! Except for the final fact that the Mueller report stated no criminal findings of Russian collusion. Maybe Wikipedia has something the intelligence agencies missed over the years? Lol again - clown world.

Not just Wikipedia. It's all over the net. All the Agencies confirmed it happened. But of course everything that isn't Fox Views is fake news to you brainwashed KGB Lovers and American traitors. I also like the part you conveniently left out where Mueller said: "If we had had confidence that the President (Der Fuhrer) clearly did not commit a crime We Would Have Said So".

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/mueller-report-conclusions-trump-congress-attorney-general-william-barr-n986611

"(W)hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,"

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2019/05/29/mueller-charging-the-president-with-a-crime-was-an-option-we-could-not-consider/

“’Charging the president with a crime was an option we could not consider,” Mueller said.

But he didn’t clear Trump.

“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller added.

“We did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.”

Mueller said “it would be unfair” to accuse someone with a crime who can’t defend himself at trial, ***emphasizing that he was following a Justice Department policy against indicting sitting presidents.***

Republican Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado also asked Mueller about charging Trump.

"Could you charge a president with a crime after he left office?"

"Yes," Mueller replied.

"You believe that he committed — you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?" Buck continued.

"Yes," Mueller answered.

Right, like most democratic puppets - Mueller is no exception to hypocrisy. But his conclusion states AGAIN that the investigation did not conclude that the president committed a crime.

So keep peddling that hoax. It’s nothing more than that and even a four year FBI investigation confirmed it to be so.

It did not concluded because of doj policy not to indict a sitting president. It doesn't mean he's innocent. Like Mueller said.

But alas, trying to debate facts to a brainwashed culture member is like arguing with a Wall.

Everybody that doesn't agree with your Q'anon narrative is either fake news or "deep state" or Hillary eating babies as pizza toppings in a basement derp, and Everybody is a pedo except Donald, he's the Magic Savior sent by Jesus Christ. So naturally everybody including the FBI is trying to Strike him down. Lol

Debate facts? The narrative was pushed for four years and came up empty. Why?

Because of no facts.

When you find the “evidence” I’m sure Intelligence Agencies would love to see it - since they couldn’t find it after wasting tax payer money on a fraudulent investigation.

They did find it. You can sticking your head in the sand and pretend it didn't happen al you like isn't going to change the truth.

Keep going. Tell us about Dominion or the millions of dead voters or trump's parades or whatever..

Party On - 531349.jpg [image not found] Upvote for you!