Just ask, and I'll show it to you

The swing state legislatures investigations certified there was mountains of fraud, and they tried to recertify their electors.

Actually yeah. What about over 130,000 illegal, out-of state-votes in GA? The margin of victory in GA is only 12,000. Do you know what it's called when people vote in a state that they don't live in? It's called "voter fraud."

I can only assume, since you haven't given a source, that you're referring to the 132,000 votes cast in Fulton County cast by voters flagged for a change of address.

After some research, I tracked down the tweet Richard Baris made with the two screenshots. Unfortunately the screenshots provide no information on the website where the data came from, which makes it unverifiable. Also, a voter being flagged for a change of address doesn't prove that voter lives out of state. Not to mention the election officials in Georgia have already dismissed the claim as baseless.

Do you know what it's called when a claim of voter fraud is made without evidence? It's called bullshit.

You libs think you've heard the evidence but you haven't. Do you seriously believe that your precious fake news would report on it?

Ah, the old "fake news" refrain trotted out yet again. I've been listening to *that* one ever since Biden legitimately won the election.

Also, to clarify, I'm not actually a liberal or conservative.

It's very difficult to present election fraud and vote irregularities as evidence, they should have gone after the process

Okay

And yet the election stuff couldn't get accepted by a court while the mask stuff has been accepted in medical journals for hundreds of years.

My favorite conspiracy theory is now Dominion. Most Trump supporters don't even know the claims revolving around Dominion, they'd sooner just repeat the buzzword as they support it.

The audit of dominion voting machines done in MI showed that they were designed to create fraud. You can be of the opinion that the audit wasn't credible, but there is, of yet, zero evidence to support that claim.

https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1350197062055452673

When someone admits to lying about Dominion voting machines...

That's not the people who did the audit, that a news outlet. As of yet, there is no credible counter-evidence to the findings of the audit in MI.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/audit-in-michigan-county-refutes-dominion-conspiracy-theory/

With that said, I'm not super learned in the workings of voting machines, so my conclusion of your article could very well be faulty.

Fair enough, I read the article very thoroughly and while it does cast some doubt on the report, it doesn't provide any suitable evidence to the contrary. It says that "a Dec. 17 audit of ballots cast in Antrim County, Michigan, affirmed the outcome of the presidential election there." This doesn't prove anything because the vote switch, supposedly caused by "human error," had already been fixed, so doing an audit of the vote totals wouldn't have seen any significant change in the count (which it didn't). Also, it says that the "errors" mentioned in Ramsland's report weren't actually errors and were normal occurrences. But there's a catch. Ramsland's report said that the erroneous ballots would get sent to adjudication thus allowing the pole working to choose which candidate the votes were for. Not once in the article does it say that the said votes wouldn't get sent to adjudication and not once does it deny the claim that the poll worker would then be able to choose the candidate.

Maybe, but what spurred this closer examination was that it was designed to create massive voter fraud and influence voting results; that's what Trump's legal team had been alleging. That part is refuted.

That's also very hard to prove though because it requires evidence of intent. What matters is that the machines were able to do it whether or not they were designed to.

Very true, but that doesn't change his allegations of massive, widespread voter fraud.