Our very Democracy is being threatened

The point being that what the lawyers brought in was mostly garbage they read on the Internet. The law is very clear on what is and isn't admissible as evidence.

Nope, nearly every case was dismissed for non-evidentiary reasons. Please stop spreading fake news.

"I'm right as long as you only look at the cases I want you to look at."

No, if you look at all the cases, most of them were dismissed for non-evidentiary reasons. Its really just that simple.

Read them. You're not correct.

I have. Stop reading the judges commentary and read the actual documents.

The judges' commentary IS the actual documents!

No the actual reason is listed, then followed by the judges 'justification' which has no bearing on the action reason listed. It does not make the reason listed more effective or ok in any way.

Well you can always appeal it OH WAIT YOU DID SCOTUS RULED THAT THE LOWER COURTS DID THEIR JOB JUST FINE

No they don't. Get a job.

That's like the third one of those I've seen today.

That's because the OP is a spammer. Has been spamming us for years.

Is OP his name or stand for his name?

"OP" is a VERY common way of referring to the Original Poster, and in this context that would be the person who posted the meme at the top of this page.

However, that was a mistake on my part, as I was actually referring to the person who began the thread (now deleted) rather than FlameWar who is not an alt account of the spammer.

I see had me confused for a second, though that's not very hard to do.

Your words, not mine!

Tell me specifically what evidence you think was wrongfully denied

Hundreds of signed affidavits, video, and pictures. Statistical info and voter comparisons. You name it. Lots of evidence was denied.
Watch the state legislature investigations into it. You might be surprised.

Biden doesn't have to do a thing. He has the media reporting "there's nothing to see here"

Indeed: because there is, in fact, nothing to see here

Other than mountains of fraud.

I have seen the “affidavits, video, and pictures” you reference and they all fall into one of 3 categories:

1. They describe conduct that is irrelevant.
2. They describe conduct that isn’t actually illegal.
3. They describe conduct that is illegal but didn’t actually happen (I.e. are unverified hearsay or simply bald face lies).

It’s all a product of a mass delusion — rabid Trump supporters citing other rabid Trump supporters.

There’s a reason Biden’s legal team hasn’t had to fire a shot against these lawsuits, and it’s because they’re all bullshit and collapse on their own.

No you haven't. If you did you'd know they were real. If not they should be investigated and proved false and the signee should go to jail.
That's not happening. What is happening is courts are not issuing subpoenas based on signed affidavits which is standard procedure.