Buff Doge vs. Cheems

Read the ruling. SCOTUS threw out the Texas lawsuit because Texas can't sue Michigan for what they do with their own election laws.

Everyone told you this lawsuit would fail.

If those laws are changed in a manner that violates the Constitution, then Texas and the other states have every right to sue Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin for screwing them out of a fair and transparent election. The Supreme Court caving into Leftist intimidation than strike down the unconstitutional rule changes for not going through the state legislature only proves that they are spineless cowards whose degrees are not worth the paper their printed on.

No, they don't. That's what everyone's been trying to tell you. Texas does not have standing to interfere with another state's election laws. By the way, federal courts have ALREADY ruled that these states' election laws are constitutional.

Nope. All the Federal Courts did was pass the buck to the State Legislatures. You know, the legal body that the Democrats bypasses to make the last minute rule changes, making the new laws unconstitutional?

That's right: The job of the Federal Courts is to take cases when state courts violate federal laws in their decisions. Y'all failed to prove that this was the case here, so the federal courts threw your cases out.

And you were told from the beginning that this would be your biggest problem because election law is a state-level thing. In some places, it's a local statute thing. So, you knew this going into it. You've only yourselves to blame for losing when you didn't have good proof.

The Supreme Court only threw out the Texas Lawsuit because they are a bunch of spineless cowards whose degrees are not worth the paper they were printed on.

No: just like EVERYBODY told you from the beginning, they threw out the Texas lawsuit because Texas didn't have a case by Supreme Court standards.

That's not SCOTUS' fault - it's YOURS. Y'all have been driving theories that have no legal basis. And this is what happens!

For God's sakes, three of those cowards were appointed by Trump - so either it's his judgement that stinks or it's yours. The liberal media didn't appoint those Justices - Trump did.

Theories? We have found nothing but damning evidence of Voter Fraud, but thanks to the corruption of the lower courts and the cowardice of the Supreme Court, it keeps getting thrown out.

No, you haven't! All your evidence has been ruled as complete garbage by 48 different courts across six states AND by 3 different federal courts.

THAT'S NOT DAMNING EVIDENCE.

The Supreme Court did EXACTLY what they are supposed to do and you only have yourself to blame for putting your faith in such a pile of unprovable bullshit. Y'all couldn't even get one single vote ruled as fraudulent - not one.

Nope. The Supreme Court being a bunch of spineless cowards is the truth. Their justification for throwing out the Texas Lawsuit is making excuses. If skeletons could spin in their graves, then John Marshall would be able to power California for the next hundred years.

At some point, when the entire world tells you the sky is blue, you should consider that maybe it is.

6 Justices are on the right. It was a unanimous decision that took no time at all to make, just like all thinking people said it would.

Stop, just stop. It's really pathetic.

You've become everything you despise on the left.
You are unwilling to face reality.
You cannot accept the facts
You are a snowflake
You continue to make excuses

The reality is that The Supreme Court refused to uphold their oaths. The facts are that the Justices who threw out the Texas Lawsuits are all cowards and their justification is an empty excuse for dereliction of duty. You're a pathetic snowflake for supporting a demented crook who couldn't legitimately beat Trump and expecting him to heal a nation that his party divided by pushing Cancel Culture and Identity Politics.

Continue to follow that logic and you will be an angry person for a very long time because thankfully, you will never turn the nation the direction you want it to go.

The logic does not even make any sense. The Justices are beholding to no one. There is no reason for them to fear the left or right. They have lifetime appointments.

he Justices have loved ones that can and will be targeted by the Left, meaning that they have a reason to fear the Left. Doesn't change the fact that they should be disrobed and charged with dereliction of duty or that by swearing to uphold the Constitution, they are beholden to the American people. The direction I want America to go in is not down the road to Venezuela 2.0, you pinko.

Oh great, we got ourselves another conspiracy theorist.

Biden is in bed with China, his party wants to push Socialist polices, and the Election was rigged. That's not conspiracy theory. That is fact.

It is not.

Biden made illicit business deals with China through Biden, the Democrats are pushing for Socialism, and there is plenty of damning evidence of fraud.

A single payer healthcare system would create the greatest economic boom in American history.
The first day of a single payer system, people would go into their admin office to say one of two things.
1. "I demand an immediate raise and an extremely large one"
Or
2. "I quit"

Half the American population today (who is not self employed), is working primarily for their healthcare package. They are willing to accept shitty bosses, shitty workplace conditions and shitty pay, all for healthcare because without it, people are screwed.

Remove healthcare from employment and that would end. People would make more money and half would quit their jobs to start their own businesses without fear of losing their home if they get sick!

The economy would skyrocket!

Honestly, this should be an issue for the right but no, it's not. The right does not want Americans to have freedom of choice, freedom for the individual. They are in the pockets of big business that is about providing, pliable workers who will put up with shit.

A single payer healthcare system isn't socialism. It's freedom for the individual.

Please provide links to your damning evidence of fraud. Maybe you should also send those links to your dear leader because he seems to be having trouble finding it himself.

It's Hunter Biden, not Joe Biden, that's alleged to have illicit dealings with China. And even that has not been established as fact.

The Democrats are pushing for some socialist policies, not a complete Socialist movement. The Green New Deal and Medicare For All are not going to lead to a slide towards communism.

There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Any so-called "evidence" has been thoroughly debunked numerous times, both in and out of court, and by people in both parties.

I prefer to live in reality. You should try it sometime.

Now that's some paranoid shit.

If they're cowards, what exactly are they afraid of? Be specific.

The Left going after them and their families.

Yet you say nothing about Republican attack dogs going after election officials.

Attack Dogs? Last time I checked, Trump supporters don't attack people while wearing black or threaten people with violence.

There was a lot of violence at Trump campaign rallies.

Violence against Trump supporters.

Wrong. Trumptards were commiting the violence.

That's how he has lived his entire life. He thinks he's some kind of kingpin mob boss and everyone is there to do his bidding.

You think Ken Paxton is still gonna get his pardon from Trump? :-)

Personally, I don't if Trump's past behavior is any indication because a) he cares only about himself and b) he hates losers.

They owe him their jobs and they swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. They deserve to be disrobed and charged with dereliction of duty for choosing to save their own skins than to use Judicial Review to protect Election Integrity.

They swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, not the Authoritarian Party's Dear Orange Leader.

Authoritarian Party? The Democrats are the ones who used Covid to make draconian and unconstitutional laws and want to shove Socialist policies down our throat, not the Republicans. Also, the Supreme Court broke their oath by throwing out the Texas Lawsuit and by extension, the Constitution. They deserve to be disrobed.

So, expanding mail-in ballot voting to make it easier to vote in the face of a pandemic that has now killed over 300k people in this country alone, is draconian? You are beyond deluded. I don't even know why I bothered mentioning the number of deaths, your side has never given a shit.

And by the way, the constitutionality of the new election laws, which were passed by the state legislatures (as provided for by Article II of the U.S. Constitution) falls under the jurisdiction of the state constitutions, not the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution only says the states must choose their own electors, and the number based on representation in Congress (number of representatives + the 2 senators). It does NOT assume authority over how states make that determination, nor does it give ANY state authority over any other state in making said determination. This was the conclusion nearly every legal expert, when asked, made, and it's the same conclusion the Supreme Court supported when it ordered that Texas lacked standing. They upheld both the U.S. Constitution and the states' authority over their own elections.

The framers of the U.S. Constitution set up the Supreme Court and other federal courts by design to have authority to determine cases independently of the other branches of government. While Congress does have the power to impeach and remove judges and justices, it has rarely exercised this power (and never over a matter of partisan politics). To date, only 15 judges/justices have been impeached, and of those, only 8 were removed.

You're just being sour grapes.

I was referring to the Covid restrictions, not mail-in voting. You've completely missed the point.

I suppose you're referring to the guidelines from the CDC enacted by state governments and local businesses. Tell me, if getting people to wear masks, avoid large gatherings and social distancing is somehow draconian, how is compelling every male citizen to register for Selective Service in order to potentially be used as cannon fodder in some war any less so?

Not that any of this is relevant to Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al or the Supreme Court's order.

Social Distancing is draconian and unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment (Freedom To Peaceably Assemble and Freedom of Religion). Prohibiting people who don't wear masks from a business violates the First Amendment (Freedom of Expression). Registering for Selective Service is not draconian, as the Draft exists on a contingency basis, conscription is Constitutional (Article I, Section 8), and unless World War III happens, I highly doubt that it will be implemented again.

The rights enumerated by the First Amendment are not limitless. Legal precedent has always supported the limiting of those rights when public health and safety are at risk. Social distancing is supposed to limit the spread of a virus.

Businesses have the right to refuse service as long as they don't discriminate based on religion, origin, race or physical disability. Refusing service for not wearing a mask due to a pandemic is well within a business's rights.

Whether the Draft exists on a contingency basis or not doesn't change the fact that compelling males into military service is draconian. Whether it's constitutional or not doesn't change that either.

Good luck wid dat.

I seriously doubt the Supreme Court is afraid of anybody, especially a partisan politician.

The Supreme Court is made up of people. People who have loved ones. And considering that BLM and ANTIFA are the attack dogs of the Democratic Party, I wasn't surprised that they were intimidated, though I am disappointing that they let fear cloud their judgement.

We've been hearing more about Republican attack dogs lately.

Nope. Fake News.

Real news. TrumpTards threatening violence against election workers in Georgia and Michigan and other swing states.

Where did you get it? CNN? MSM? The Hill? Fox News? The article is fake news.