“Infections are almost as high as places with no lockdowns”
Based on what? Where? You’re aware that Sweden is abandoning the Swedish model because it’s been an abject failure?
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-12-10/sweden-rethinks-approach-coronavirus-second-wave
“Blah blah blah Texas blah blah Cailifornia blah”
What?
Lockdowns wouldn’t be necessary if people followed the protocols, but too many people (like yourself, I’m sure) are too preoccupied with your freedums.
“The virus itself has a 0.26% death rate.”
I’m curious where you got your number. As of today, 16,549,366 Americans have been infected and 305,082 have died. Math says that’s 1.82% death rate (and 2.23% globally). None of this takes into consideration the long term health effects of those who survive the infection, which we won’t know for years.
And once again, lockdowns wouldn’t be necessary if knuckle-draggers were looking out and being responsible for their fellow man.