yep

Why do that, when she has a new mansion to buy with all that money that appeared magically into her bank account.

"Calling an election unfair does not make it so." - Stephanos Bibas, one of Trump's appointees

Judges ruled that Michigan's election was in full compliance to Michigan state law. Nobody proved that an audit was required. So the results stand and yep, Biden won.

We're not running a full-scale forensic audit of every election where the sore loser claims there was cheating. That would make it way too easy for the loser in every election from senator to dog catcher to clog up the process. We don't have the time or the tax dollars for that. We will perform these audits when you can find some go***mned f**king evidence that we need to.

We don't have an anarchy: Joe Biden is President next month. The folks are fine with it - we had a vote and Biden won.

Ok, well, shall we read what the courts have to say about it again?

So you want to pass an act of Congress mandating the courts to suspend election results on unfounded disputes?

hmmmmmm you mean like a voting rights act that applies to the whole nation and not just to the part you don't like or want to control? Fascinating tell me more ? LOL

Not unfounded. Mountains of evidence.

That's not what these court rulings say.

You're on fire, Colonel!

thesis is no match for you!

Sadly, this fraudulent election and the lack of action by people who profess being honest, will lead us to getting exactly what we deserve.

The economy will tank. Of course, Biden will blame it on Trump even though it was you dumbocrats who forced the lockdown.

Free speech will be just a distant memory, as anyone who doesn't get on board with critical race theory will be jailed.

It's going to be a nightmare. Hopefully you will suffer as much as the rest of us, thesis.

Well, no offense, but if you've spent the last two months being wrong over and over and over again about what's about to happen, what makes you think there's any value to you speculating even further about the future?

There's a difference between being wrong, and Trump having pathetic lawyers who can't get their act together. It's not what you know, it's what you can prove.

I think if you knew what I posted here on imgflip about the election (and I don't expect anyone but me to know the totality of what I've posted) even going back to before the election, I stated that I believed whichever side "won" would be the side that was better at cheating. That's because the democrats clearly made it so easy for voter fraud, combined with my belief that if something can happen, it will happen. So making it so easy to cheat, pretty much guaranteed that there would be cheating. The one thing I didn't see coming was the scale.

So thesis, if Trump had "won", I would feel the same way. Granted, I think the country would be the better for it, but that wouldn't make it right. And I think if you could somehow take a step back and be objective, and consider the hypothetical of Trump not just beating Biden, but beating him in the same incredibly suspicious way, you might be able to see what I'm talking about.

Forget all that... what in the hell are you talking about when you say something regarding 'any value speculating about the future'? You're speculating about the future when you state as a fact that Biden will be sworn in. While it's highly more likely than it's not, that you're right, that doesn't mean it's not speculation.

That's the problem with you liberals. An utter inability to be objective about any facts for which you have a blinding passion.

Well, what does it tell you that the only lawyers Trump can get to argue this shit are the bad ones?

It tells me he had bad lawyers to start with.

There are literally thousands of people who have sworn affidavits to witnessing pretty sizeable voter fraud. That type of legal document is not created by those with anything to hide, nor fear, because lying on an affidavit is perjury, which carries serious legal consequences.

Hell, just check with Kamikaze. He felt that a sworn affidavit from an anonymous person, a Jane Doe, was enough to prove that Trump was linked to Epstein. But I guess for your side, the standard of proof is a moving standard when it's against your guy.

Oh my God, again with those f**king affidavits - the courts threw them out, they were so bad. They were useless. Those affidavits are gone. They impressed nobody. They're done.

All I know is you guys love affidavits... until you don't love them, when it's inconvenient for you. Settle down thesis, I'm not trying to upset you.

These affidavits were terrible. They straight up admit that they didn't see what happened half the time.

Irrelevant. Just ask Kamikaze. Affidavits are pure gold for your side, pure garbage when they're for the other side. Hypocrisy in action again.

I don't know what to tell you: a good affidavit can sway a case, a bad affidavit can't. Affidavits are not created equally. They never were.

I am probably giving Kamikaze's opinion too much sway. All I know about them is if you lie on a sworn statement, it's perjury. Opening up oneself to a perjury charge is not something I would do, so I don't believe others would either. Maybe I'm wrong about that. If so, then Kamikaze needs to quit trotting out that stupid affidavit every time he wants to paint Trump as a child molester.

Seriously thesis? A forensic audit is exactly what it would take to expose the fraud, but those who perpetrated it won't allow that to happen, and you know exactly why.

The problem with making cheating so easy, is that it is nearly impossible to prove, especially when those who we trust to do the right thing have their eyes shut.

So yes, the incredibly fraudulent result will stand.

It will probably come out years later what a travesty this election has been. Our generation will be the laughing stock of American history. Or worse, the generation that will become known as the Biden generation, the one that allowed Sundowner Joe to bumble our country into subservience to the CCP.

If you need to overturn the election result in order to prove that we need to overturn the election result, you don't have a case. The judges are basically asking you for probable cause, essentially. The same reason a cop can't come into your house and say "we'll charge you with something when we find what you're hiding in here."

Negative. I never said we need to overturn the election result to prove that we need to overturn the election result. That sounds pretty much like liberal logic to me.

They're not even looking at the evidence, but you wouldn't know that because the media you blindly subscribe to, is not telling you what's going on.

What I said was we need a forensic investigation. Unless of course, thesis, you're trying to tell me that a forensic investigation is the same as overturning the election. Hmmm, agree with me again, hey thesis? 👀

Once again, you're on board with me. Be careful thesis, if this keeps up, you'll lose your progressive membership card, and be standing tall before the committee!!

Read the ruling. The evidence the RNC lawyers put in was crap. The judges looked at it and ruled it was crap.

Judges are like water; they'll follow the path of least resistance, even if they're republicans IRL. It's naïve of anyone to believe that Trump has the support of mainstream republican party apparatus, any more than he has the support of the mainstream media, or the DNC. He's had to fight them all, since the moment he declared his candidacy. It's the people who support him. It's the people who should be outraged if the claims of fraud are proven true even if it's months or years after the election.

I just happen to believe that's what's going to happen. But by then it will be too late. Biden, who has his hand in China's pocket by way of Hunter and his buddies on Wall St, is going to run this country into the ground. He's going to put us in second place behind China, economically and militarily. And that my imgflip friend, is not just bad for America, it's bad for the entire civilized, freedom loving world.

What utter nonsense. Judges would dismiss ALL cases if that were true.

Sigh... so naïve, so blind.

We've ALREADY validated Biden's win. We counted twice. Three times in some states.

And since nobody proved anything in court, that's a valid vote count.

Less than half the nation. Actually, about a quarter of the nation. 70 million out of 300 million.

So, yeah, actually, we, as a country, have pretty much made pretty sure. Biden won. Counted twice.

75 million out of 320 million? Similar number. Not half the country, more like a quarter.

81 million thought that Biden should be President.

It IS a bit of an issue that American politics revolves around arguing over the support of about 10% of the country but the difference is that I don't pretend it were otherwise. The election was still valid. We counted twice.