I know I don't have a wall of text, but I think this argument stands on it's own

Recounts are not validating ballots

That validating the count, not the ballots themselves. You'd need an audit to verify the ballots to check them. Either way it is impossible to get more legal votes than legal voters.

Yes, I understand your inability to admit that you have nothing and use the race card, insults, and topic changes as cover.

Isn't nice that you have so many NO! U! responses that make no sense to cover your use of the race card and varies fallacies.

I understand, you are OK by your own demission with lying and using fallacies to get the results that you want and therefore have no interest in the truth. That's why you make up fake things for me to feel to avoid using facts and reason.

Nevertrumpers unite!

Nice use of the race card. You like disenfranchising blacks by using them as shields for fraud to take their own votes away? 4oa0dl.jpg (click to show)

Sorry but your Bulverism isn't proof of anything other than you playing the race card so you can use black people like shields to cover possible corruption and thus disenfranchise blacks and their votes.

Nice doubling down on you Bulverism and using blacks as a shield and topic change. Whatever it takes to avoid dealing with facts you don't like. http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2019/07/bulverism-and-mainstream-dominant-left.html

Traitors? You would know all about that since you are one Supporting the usurpation of elections and their integrity that subverts democracy. So why did the democrats implement things that would bring the elections into question? Like mail in ballots and a hundred other changes that all help cheat or open up fraud potential like no signature required etc. you are a fraud and a traitor like all the rest of you socialist leftists. If Biden is sworn in he will be a truly illegitimate president elected by fraud committed by leftist traitors and their supporters like you. If Biden is sworn Impeach 46.

Georgia is already investigating out of state ballot applications and democratic groups encouraging monkey business to steal the senate run offs. Just what they did before but traitors like you don’t care if it’s fraud as long as your TDS is satisfied, right traitor.

Keep trying Benedict kerfuffle. Keep hearing only what you want. Your TDS impairs your objectivity. Quit being a useful idiot of the enemies of this country traitor and back America.

You lost because you are a mental midget and a traitor

I thought retarded was hate speech for you snowflakes ❄️. Oh but l, as per your hypocrisy it’s ok now. Not surprising your morals are variable. Like all socialist traitors.

That was quick even for a traitor like you

History will see you as a failure. Weak kneed wobbly failure who betrayed his country.

You mean the millions of ballots that were turned in after the cutoff time, double voters, pets voting, people voting from out of state and then voting in the state they were in, people voting multiple times, xeroxed votes, and the thousands of signed affidavits witnessing voter fraud?
Don't worry. It'll all come out in the supreme court.

No, it won't, and not only because your deluded fantasies aren't true.

Misused of fallacy is thus denied, by your own standards even. But nice Reductio ad Hitlerum, that is also denied. Maybe some day you'll understand that when you directly say your OK with lying and are not bound by reason that you have made the truth and rational thought your enemy.

Your appeal to insults and red herring is denied.

O don't but you do, nice double standard.

The main thrust of your point is a Tū Quoque (The you too fallacy or appeal to hypocrisy) in classic form. You also further assume (falsely at that) why I think what I do and make that the point while assuming that I'm wrong, which is a bulverism fallacy.

You also misused the fallacy of the poison well (ridicule or discrediting the opponent before they speak to affect judgement) and the term fruit of the poisoned tree (illegally obtained evidence).

There are always some who register on election day.

Not that many

What, there's an arbitrary "acceptable limit"?

How many did actually register on election day? That is the only question here that would matter and if that many didn't register then it would show illegal votes.

Right, how many registered is the key.

Is there an actual official number? That could prove this issue either way/

Somebody in the elections office certainly knows how many people registered on Election Day.

I doubt it. It would take some time to compile even after they started the process which I doubt they have bothered to due.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

You are correct. You putting up two colored rectangles without any backing evidence is no evidence at all. Find something better to do with your time.