“To your first point: 400,000 German Jews could have been armed, organized a militia, and defended themselves. Obviously he thought they were a threat enough to disarm them first.”
There weren’t 400,00 Jews in Germany in 1938, their population were almost half that at 218,000 (which was down almost 60% from a mere three years prior), which accounted for 0.3% of the total population. Figure, generously, half of that population is of fighting ability (including men and women), and then how many of them actually possessed guns? Let’s say 100,000, for arguments sake, and again that’s being extremely generous.
The Germans had 600,000 troops in 1938, not to mention tanks and aircraft. So, the idea that a militia could be organized and defend themselves is ludicrous at best.
“To your second point: “Confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed to be dangerous”. Context matters.”
The reason they passed the law was to publicly give the excuse to arrest, the same way a cop can say you got pulled over for a faulty taillight.
But again, YOU said the Nazis came to power by confiscating guns. The Nazis can’t confiscate guns if they don’t know who has them.
On this we agree: context matters.
And in this and every other context you’re trying to push this BS narrative, you’re wrong.
