Both
1. Isolate and protect the people at high risk of dying: +65, diabetic, obese, high blood pressure, COPD, immunocompromised.
2. Everyone else still works, biz as usual.
3. If you have symptoms, stay home
4. Some will need medical treatment. Treat early w/chloroquine/zinc/vit D/Zithromax
In Ohio median age for COVID deaths is 81. Similar elsewhere.
As I see it, if you’re exposed to COVID-19 there are possible outcomes:
a. You have no symptoms, may possibly have cross immunity from another coronavirus, possibly from MMR vaccine, possibly from TB vaccine, or just genetics. If you acquired the virus with no symptoms, you can spread it.
b. You have very mild symptoms and may not even think you’re sick, but you can spread it after you develop symptoms. Or, your symptoms may be quite obvious and you’ll feel very sick.
c. You have very serious symptoms and need medical treatment. Three outcomes here:
1. You get better relatively quickly without needing a ventilator.
2. You don’t recover quickly and go on a ventilator for over a week and recover.
3. You don’t recover quickly, go on a ventilator, and eventually die.
Sorry, it is Brooklyn:
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835699/
It’s not the infection rate or number of infections that is matters. What’s important is protecting the people that are vulnerable to dying. In the long run, if you want to protect the people that are vulnerable to dying, it’s important to achieve heard immunity as quickly as possible. Economically speaking it’s cheaper to protect a smaller percentage of the population for a shorter amount of time, then it is to have everybody not go to work and just totally destroyed economy for eight months to a year or longer. End of story!