What's a black name and a white name?

Yeah, it seems that itself is “racist” if we are going to use that term.

Something like Shiranda, Marqitta, or Mercedes vs Ashley, Christian, and Cathy

LMAO

How is pointing out the injustice in how others are treated racist? I'm not the one who refused to give people a chance because their parents gave them a name people stereotype as Afro-centric. I bet you think the assault rifle social experiments were fake too and/or doing those was racist 😒.

Because your usual (and limited) assortment of ad hominems and deliberately false assumptions plus a delightful red herring makes your partisan hack propaganda valid?

LOOK at the OP meme and READ it. Repeat till you SEE the injustice that is what it IS pointing out.

I'd ask you to attempt to refute the theme but as usual you didn't because you can't, so you throw a hissy fit yet again to make it clear how deep seated your volatile mental issues are.
Straw man indeed.

First. Did your meme mean to communicate " You think affirmative actions isn't needed. Tell me again about studies where job candidates with equal qualification with black names were called over those with white ones?" If that is what you meant - dependending on how the study was conducted - that could still be racism, but in the opposite direction.

Second. The chance is not just strong, but very strong, that most studies conducted with the said outcomes were conducted by sociology departments with a vast majority of leftist professors biased towards those outcomes.

"Chances are very strong..." How is that even an argument? If you have a counter to my declaration, and that it was conducted by "leftist professors biased towards outcomes," then let's see it. You can't because what you're saying is an assumption. Remember what they said about those?

A few years ago it was discovered that about 98% of those SHOCKING sociological studies could not be duplicated and still produce the same results. In other words, they turned out to have been bogus studies driven by leftist ideology rather than actual science. Cool, eh?

That's a lie. Post your article please.

I don't have to. Google it. You're trying to disapprove what I posted. You feel so strongly about it disapprove it.

The false claim of 98% was NOT made by the OP, but by the Right Wing cultist you're white knighting.

Actually... that is how it works. You came on my meme trying to disprove a point I made son. So put out or leave. Or stay and we can keep going in circles. Also: "Disprove vs Disapprove" So what? Despite my spelling error, you knew what I meant, so you pointing that out only shows how you're trying to derail the issue. Stay focused please. Your sophism isn't working on me -_-.

THAT'S her only 'argument,' grammar.

She has no information she can provide, no rebuttal, no refuttal, nothing.
So she gets you to do all the work while she makes a giant issue about a missing comma.

Omg just because you SAY something doesn't make it true. You... You do realize that right? You ain't Gandalf the Grey or a wizard Harry. And you still come to MY meme saying it's incorrect, but can't provide a link to the contrary. Keep derailing kid. And I DID use sophism right. But I guess that's all a troll can do... Point out spelling/grammar/word miss use without making a solid point. This isn't English class Wlliam Strunk Jr., but a debate that you're coming up short in. But go ahead; humor me some more 😉. If you disagree that's fine, but don't come here showing off how smort you are, because you're only fooling yourself.

454c2i.jpg (click to show)

As if her posting ''unrelevant'' was a typo.

Listen Mr. Smort, I wouldn't have an issue if you JUST stated how you think affirmative action is negative because it hurts qualified people from getting jobs regardless of race (despite the history of racism in not giving minorities a fair chance in America negating that point). I'd disagree but respect your stance, because the system can be abused. However, what makes you Mr. Smort is you trying to affirm a sweeping statement someone else made with a statistic (98% thing) by saying I need to provide proof for my meme. It's a meme man. A true meme, but only a meme nonetheless. I didn't try to disprove anything with a statistic; your buddy did. Since I wasn't trying to PROVE anything, I don't have to show you squat. It's your friend, and I guess by association you, who are trying to disprove ME. I could easily Google .org articles and papers to show the studies. So could you, but you're being so predictable now I know what your response will be. So, since we're both brick walls, unless you want to prove your more than smort, let's agree to disagree. We're both ADULTS, right?

454c2i.jpg (click to show)

Not like this is all ''unrelevant''

Neither is your classic invention, ''unrelevant''

I won't reply to the original poster because he declared me a liar without cause; but the report did come out about seven years ago and then was promptly scrubbed by anguished researchers. Ironically they since then began tackling the issue without acknowledging the full scope of what was initially reported: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

No buddy, you tried to say 98% of these studies could not be duplicated in other studies. That's a bold statement; you seem very knowledgeable. I want to see the evidence.

No, it is for the one who made the false claim - posting a precise figure of 98%, no less - to prove. ''I would but it got scrubbed'' is not proof.

Whatever troll.

Lol, who's a child exactly 😆?

You deleted your original comment... so no you ;).

No, that was you. Mr. Smort 😉. Are YOU paying attention?

https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/minorities-who-whiten-job-resumes-get-more-interviews. The article and study even state how Affirmative Action CAN be abused without abating the findings. You're welcome. If you come to MY memes come smart, not smort. I could get MORE abstracts/studies if I wanted to, but I'll leave that to you lazy racists and deluded minority Republicans (Not all are deluded. Calm down kids.) I can't do all the work for you 😁. I'm done.

Because you're so trollish in your disagreements. It's fun to watch you feed.