Why “believe all women” isn’t the nail in the coffin of Biden’s campaign that Republicans seem to think it is

Yes, we know. You could vote for a guy that raped 5 women over a guy that raped 6 with a clear conscience. Hahaha

And btw, #believeallwomen is a leftist tenet. So deal with your hypocrisy being called out.

Gotta vote for the lesser of two evils, right?

Remember 2016.

That's one thing. Saying you could vote with a clear conscience one rapist over another is a Kylie hypocrisy special.

Vote for one of them. Lesser of two evils.

*Right-wing hypocrisy intensifies*

If I knew it was between one rapist and another, I'd choose someone else or not vote. Not vote for someone who raped one less than the other with a 'clear conscience', you disingenuous leftist.

Crap like that tweet is why I abandoned both parties

So who you voting for?

I think it’s safe to say that a proven, convicted rapist would never win a major party nomination, though the pace of unprecedented events of the past few years may have called that into question.

So: Hey! I agree with you!

Btw this is at least the second time you’ve said something like this, but for the record I never said anything remotely about comparing 5 rapes vs. 6 rapes.

The numerical comparison at hand between Biden and Trump is 1 to roughly 25, and we are talking about unproven allegations of sexual assault of varying degrees of severity.

Another good time to mention that Biden hasn’t ever been accused of “rape” (ask if you need help defining that term): Trump has been, more than once. In addition to the other “lower-level” sexual assaults that Trump himself might characterize (and I am only speculating here) as grabbing by the pussy.

And another good time to mention that Weinstein had about 100 public accusations against him at the time of his conviction, which was on only 2 counts (and not guilty on 3 counts). But does anyone here really believe Weinstein only assaulted 2 of those 100 or so public accusers?

Can you think of any reasons for that discrepancy?

What do Weinstein’s (and Epstein’s) examples suggest about how we should treat a certain number of similar public allegations even if they haven’t yet been “proven” in a court of law?

Where there is smoke, there is fire, as they say.

As for that meme: Looks like a worthy one for the Leftist cringe files. Feel free to submit. imgflip.com/m/Cringe_Left

Wonder if it will be a repeat performance of 2016.
Third Electoral College win for a Republican this Century.
Gerrymandering

Yes, so glad i partied it up in 1999

Have a drink on me👀

btw I don't claim Biden is guilty. However, seeing how you leftists have been crying about Trump for years, you'd think you'd hold Biden to those standards.

If you did you wouldn’t be having this conversation

Rules for Radicals: Hold your opponents to their own standards.

Sucks when Alinsky is used against you, huh?