But, But.....Trump

Deflection and just like the title says. Schiff said he had proof of Trump-Putin collusion. Schiff is head of the security council. You seethe about Trump daily yet have zero to say about dem corruption.

Funny how Mueller didn't investigate where the key piece of evidence that started the ball rolling came from. How Hillary's dnc bought a hoax dossier to get dirt on Trump, from foreign agents.

I honestly cant read it, but I'm sure Mueller saw it and his report established that in spite of an exhausting mutli year investigation, they were unable to establish collusion

Legible, results the same.

Mueller Part 1: did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government

In your entire response is nothing but red herrings and false arguments.

Your entire first paragraph, while the impressive cut and paste job that it is, only further underscores the fact you cannot point to collusion.

"It may surprise you to learn that Mueller probe was not set up to investigate or "take down" Trump or his campaign specifically: but rather to unearth any and all evidence of systematic Russian interference in the '16 election."

This is again a red herring. No such claim has been made here. The investigation was meant to investigate CRIMES related to the election. And not a person was convicted of CRIMES RELATED TO THE ELECTION.

"The emails I've linked above describe an alleged trove of incriminating dirt on HRC collected by a Russian prosecutor that Donald Trump Jr. was very interested in. That trove either did not exist, or at least was not actually provided to the Trump campaign. So these communications "didn't go anywhere," but it sure showed interest on Donny Jr.'s part!"

And this proves NOTHING. Mueller had this, and yet no charges were brought against Donald Jr.

And this creates conundrum for you. You claim that by Donald Jr. "having interest" in Russian sourced information that amounts to "attempted collusion." Okay, using your logic, the Clinton campaign PAID FOR and CIRCULATED Russian Disinformation in the form of the Steele Dossier. So are you going to condemn THIS ACTUAL COLLUSION? Or is this magically different?

Further, you are blatantly ignoring the fact that you were manipulated for years with false claims from Democrats in office, multiple intelligence officials, and Clinton campaign officials and the media.

But all you can do is trot out some nonsense that went nowhere because it established NOTHING.

"The indicted Russians were guilty as sin: ."

You mean the mystery Russians that never went to trial. Can you explain how someone is guilty without a conviction? LOL

"You're also forgetting Cohen's pornstar payoffs which were a violation of campaign finance law."

LOL...Focus little girl. Focus. We are talking about the Mueller Investigation which was not tasked to investigate campaign finance violations. So again, what person, who stood trial was convicted of any crime related to the election?

"Donald Trump Jr.'s credulousness is embarrassing at best. He's lucky he didn't get targeted or deposed. Trump as well, though we now know he would have simply rejected any sort of subpoena. There are twists and turns the Mueller probe could have taken that it decided against.

What? Thanks for the speculation, and "if this happened on then this could have happened, and then this could have followed". Wow. Any other fairytales you would like to write? The fact remains, the issue around Donald Trump Jr. was investigated, and in fact, as you stated, the man was transparent and released his emails with out being legally compelled to do so. Totally sounds like he was trying to hide something.

"As for the Steele Dossier, it's an intelligence document produced by a British MI6 counterintelligence expert on Russia. Who else would you expect to be in a position to figure out a grand Russian conspiracy? Britain is a ally of the U.S. The contents of it simply are not "Russian Disinformation," lmao. Much of it was verified by the FBI/Mueller."

And now you have moved from speculation to out right revisionist history. But before we get to that, you failed to realize you have contradicted yourself AGAIN. You are upset about foreign interference in the election but then you excuse a foreign intelligence agent working IN THE ELECTION. Just because Steele is British, doesn't mean its not foreign interference.

Now, onto you revisionist history. We now know, thanks to INVESTIGATING THE INVESTIGATION the following key facts: 1) The Steele Dossier was "central and essential" to obtaining the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page. 2) The FBI intentionally omitted in its FISA application that Steele Dossier was a DNC funded campaign document. 3) The FBI NEVER CORROBORATED ANYTHING IN IT. 4) The FBI knew the Steele Dossier was RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION.

Facts 1 thru 3 verified here: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/horowitz-report-steele-dossier-collusion-new

Fact 4: Footnote 350 in the IG report addresses the FBI's knowledge of Russian contacts with Steele and the potential for disinformation. Steele had "frequent contacts with representatives for multiple Russian oligarchs, we identified reporting the Crossfire Hurricane team received from (redacted) indicating the potential for Russian disinformation influencing Steele's election reporting."

"And damn right the DNC and its oppo research team were interested in it: It would be political malpractice not to be"

Kylie TwatWaffle: Donald Trump Jr being INTERESTED in a trove of opposition research collected by a Russian prosecutor is ATTEMPTED COLLUSION.

Also Kylie TwatWaffle: It would be "political malpractice" for the Clinton campaign to ignore opposition research sourced from Russian Intelligence agencies.

Once again, we see the issue is not the act, but who commits the act

Nice work.