NOT the Law & Order Candidate...

That's not what he said.

During ABC News’s 2020 Democrat Debate, Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana, vowed to free all drug dealers and drug traffickers from federal prison in the midst of the opioid crisis.

https://www.thedailysheeple.com/mayor-pete-vows-to-free-all-drug-dealers-and-drug-traffickers-from-federal-prison/?fbclid=IwAR349oqpdnV1fs7RpoK_cY2hqwW8409V8kDdw4INBAOwiE77pN5ZvR86JHM

I watched the debate and don't give two shits what some hack opinion piece from, "thedailysheeple" has to twist reality.

He said that he would decriminalize possession. He did not say dealers and specifically clarified that.

Who cares, this is far worse.

And Tucker is one of the main propaganda machines feeding the idea of American illegitimacy. Our own President prefers to believe Putin over 7 of his own intelligence agencies.

Tucker's the best anchor on tv. See any other channel discussing the new way forward act? You cool with deported criminals being flown back on taxpayer's dime? Tucker's also heavily criticized Trump at times. And possibly prevented a war when trump backed off Iran because of his advice. You just hate him because he makes the left look stupid while debating them. Trump/Tucker 2020!

Those the 7 intelligence agencies that said Trump was colluding with Putin? That Saddam had wmds? That altered Carter Page's email to fool the FISA court?

Thank you for proving what side believes in an illegitimate government.

Tucker, is NOT an, "anchor" in any sense of the word. He is a political commentator and conservative journalist. His own show is a, "talk show", not news.

Covers more news than CNN or MSLSD.

Far more news.

But you wouldn't know that.

Anchors aren't anchors anymore. You still think Brian Williams has credibility?

Jesus Christ. CNN isn't hardly news either!

Reuters, AP, C-Span are news.

You'd fall asleep in 5 minutes watching any one of them because they wouldn't push all the buttons you're used to.

I just googled AP New way forward act.

Nothing.

Keep thinking things aren't happening because the usual msm suspects don't report on it.

Why don't you go to Pete's site and get your information from the actual source?

Instead, you choose to go to hacks who chop up truths with fake news and throw it in a blender and scream it out under opinion pieces disguised as, "news".

You said it all the moment you called Tucker an anchor. You are hopelessly lost.

You said it all by implying 'anchors' have credibility. I know what Tucker is, he doesn't deny it. Yet he brings more to the table than anyone that has a show on msm tv. As to your claims of fake news, give an example. Now go, google away.

At least we are down to 7 agencies these days.

Here are a couple of articles but there are a lot more out there, SPatoine.

Pete Buttigieg Vows to Free 74K Drug Traffickers from Federal Prison
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/02/07/watch-pete-buttigieg-vows-to-free-74k-drug-traffickers-from-federal-prison/

https://www.thedailysheeple.com/mayor-pete-vows-to-free-all-drug-dealers-and-drug-traffickers-from-federal-prison/

Jesus Christ

"The Daily Sheeple"
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: LOW

Notes: The Daily Sheeple is conspiracy driven and sometimes anti-science. There is very little proven factual content on this website. (D. Van Zandt 7/21/2016)

"Breitbart.com"
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda as well as numerous false claims.

No wonder all you idiots are so pissed off. You're being fed a consistent and never ending bowl of lies and you just keep sucking it up.

It depends on who is doing the reviewing, SPatoine. Liberals do not like conservative sites...just check with the Fascist Facebook police. I am Admin of a group and got the FB police panties in a wad because I posted an article about the fires in Australia being deliberately set. That was true, of course, but since GLOBAL WARMING was not represented in the article, they called it out as being "misleading". Their checks were by Politico and left-leaning checkers. So, an article confirming arrests of numerous people for setting fires should be ignored in favor of "global warming"? No, conservatives are not "pissed off" as you say, we are "sane".

Climate change is one factor affecting how fires in Australia burn, regardless of whether arsonists or lightning started them. https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/climate-change-bushfires-australia-breitbart-newspunch/?fbclid=IwAR3w5xEu-5uyZ1nHOG1TLLxdKfhffXZvZvVCuEuXhbrs9GAoT1smKsFxGXw

I don't look at facebook. It's more garbage. Honestly, you have no idea what real sources are.

What you're admitting to is the propagation of an alternative fact. Yes, fires WERE started. Everyone knows that. They were so severe because the country is dealing with the most extreme dryness in recorded history, due to climate change.

They are dealing with extreme dryness due to lack of rain! You can no more state a definitive
cause than anyone else. This is "fact"....nearly two hundred people were detained for investigation/prosecution for setting fires in Australia.

Best read I have seen lately to give loony liberals common sense facts instead of hysteria (by Jack Hellner).... https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/global_warmings_50_years_of_fraud.html

If they were so severe and due to the climate change as SP claims then why did 10 times more acreage burn out in the 1974 fire season. Why, Because Australia is regularly in Drought conditions it's a fact of life there. 3 months of no rain is the definition they apply to drought and is easily achieved all over Australia year in and year out.

This is what man-made climate change looks like, SPatoine.