20f68v.jpg (click to show) The discovery period is over. It's time for trial on the evidence (or lack thereof) available now.

After 13.5 hours that is all I walked away with...

Yes, they have a mountain of evidence. It would be better if they had it all. Is this hard?

All this evidence available...and the Dems are using their limited time, not to discuss what they have, which was overwhelming reason for an impeachment, to ask for a chance to get more evidence. Either the evidence they have supports impeachment and should be discussed, or it doesn't and should be dismissed. The whole purpose of the trial is to deliberate on the findings of the impeachment, not to continue it. The whole ruse is intent on cluttering up the year of an election for their gain. That's all.

(Outside of this impeachment) is it ever legit to prevent documents from being examined? or to prevent witnesses from testifying? Is it fake news that they've been stonewalling?

If it's a witch hunt cool.. let em look at every single alleged ingredient in the nothing burger so we can move on. I'd like to hear what Bolton and a few others testimony but I kind of doubt it's going to happen.

Executive Privilege is practiced by every president. It's a constitutional right. It protects him or her from overreach by opposing parties. It can be overridden when two of the other branches agree, in this case the Scotus. The Scotus could have forced the testimony had the Democrats not withdrawn their supoenas. If not for this protection, the president would have no private conversations at all, and world leaders would be less likely to hold talks with a nation that doesn't guarantee their privacy.

Keep trying you American hater.

I'm not necessarily saying she converted anyone into a Trumpist. What I'm saying is idk if Trump would've won against anyone besides "crooked Hillary".. and had Trump not became president, I seriously doubt there would be any "Trump cult".

America's cool.. getting kind of wild west-y out here but I'm not moving to Canada any time soon.

You sound like a cult unto yourself.

The only ones that are going to show up to take guns are the cops 2nd Amendment lovers enjoy worshipping.

You see you are not a 2nd Amendment supporter

A "right" is no "right" at all if laws exist that restrict, deny, and regulate your imaginary "right"

You support gun laws that you like. Such as felon restrictions. But you will never be able to point to a article of the Constitution that allows Government to carve out exceptions for a "right"

ALL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Bernie bros like to pretend they're patriotic. You support 2A but not law enforcement--very revealing.
Bernie bros call themselves "antifascists" as well...

Last week? The impeachment trial hadn’t yet started and the White House was still obstructing every outstanding congressional subpoena.

I've illustrated the concept for you so it's easy to follow...

Except McConnell never said that, and I just stated above why Dems couldn’t. The subpoenas were still blocked

Last week was equivalent to two weeks ago. There was no “goldilocks period” where all evidence was allowed