In all 17 instances of "omission" and "non-reporting", evidence that exonerated the ones being spied on (4 total) was left out, which, had this information been put in as required, the investigation would have never continued. 1 or 2 mistakes is bad, but 17, all of which perpetuated an investigation into someone that was demonstrably detested by those doing the investigation, adds up to a collaborative attempt to frame those being looked into. That's what has been alleged now for over two years. The information in the IG report is old, but now it's in one location and laid out for all to see. I seriously doubt anything substantial will come of it. We're asking a broken system to fix itself.