such a farce

Investigation of a confessed criminal = robbing a bank?

Biden confessed, in fact bragged, to holding billions in aid money ransom to get a single Ukrainian investigator fired while his son pocketed millions from a company that was under investigation by that... Single. Ukrainian. Investigator. I used to say it doesn't take a genius to see the Bidens' corruption, but once again, I underestimated the profound stupidity of leftists.

If what biden did was a crime, then trump is doubly guilty huh? smh.

Sure, just produce a single piece of evidence that Trump threatened Ukraine like Biden confessed to doing on video. Because right now, all we have is Trump politely asking for an investigation into the corruption that Biden confessed doing.

there is HIS OWN ADMISSION - and i dont give a rats ass, he committed treason before he was even elected when he asked a foreign enemy nation to hack American computers - "Russia if you are listening"

Try and focus, pothead; Russia hasn't been an enemy of the US since the USSR collapsed. That's why this retarded circus has moved on to this Ukrainian bullshit. The only thing he admitted to doing was asking Ukraine to investigate a criminal who used his position to enrich his drug addict w**remonger son with taxpayer money, which is his job. And of course, you side with the child-sniffing freak because you're all the same gross drug addict perverts on the left.

wow. you're an idiot.

Yeah, I'm the one defending a senile child molester and his coked-up stripper hound son making millions from corrupted foreign oligarchs, and blaming the whole thing on Russian ghosts. Oh wait, that's you lol

gtfo you gd hypocrite and ignorant jackass, htf do people as ignorant as you get to vote?

wtf is wrong with you? two faced partisan freak

The argument is disingenuous. Trump was acting in self-interest. Biden was carrying out the official policy of the US government to get a corrupt prosecutor fired. It's actually quite simple.

Yes, there was just the one corrupt beurocrat in Ukraine that needed fired, and it's just a coincidence it was the one single agent investigating his son's bosses lol

The agent was not investigating his son - that is simply a lie. The investigation into the firm was defunct before Hunter was hired. I do agree that Hunter should not have taken the job, since it is likely that they hired him because of his last name, but that is not a defence of Trump corrupting using the power of state to have a foreign state investigate a political opponent.

if I drove a Mercury I'd be so cool, water would freeze in my hand

https://www.npr.org/2019/11/08/777573489/white-house-broke-from-normal-process-handling-trump-ukraine-call-witness-said

This is not right at all.

The impeachment process is like a criminal investigation.
There's a report of a crime.
There's an investigation. People are interviewed under oath.
If it's determined a crime was committed and there's overwhelming evidence, they go to trial.

but to use your meme:

One day a neighbor of yours said, "Hey, I think that crazy guy down the street murdered his wife."

Then you talked to some of the other neighbors and they all said that "Yeah, he killed her."

You called the cops.

The cops came to investigate but before that could happen that guy came out on the porch and started shouting. "Yes, I did shoot at my wife. I'm an expert shooter. I always hit whatever target I'm aiming at. I'm one of the legendary aimers. If I did shoot her, and if I did shoot her, which I did, it would be the best most perfect shot anyone had ever seen. Everyone says that. And here's a transcript of the video I took while I shot my wife. But, right where it says 'Imma gonna kill you, bitch! blam blam blam!' is where you'll agree that she is still alive so there's no crime here. Not a crime to shoot someone and not kill them. That's not a crime. No, you can't talk to her right now. I'm not letting her talk to you because she's sleepy. So very very sleepy right now. No, you can't talk to anyone else who was in the room when I shot her. But they'd tell you that it was a perfect shot. I never miss."

But then the cops do investigate. And they find her body buried in a shallow grave with a note pinned to her chest with her husbands signature about how it's not illegal to bury someone in your own backyard.

Burying someone in your own backyard is not a crime. Also, it was a perfect grave. No one could have dug a better grave. No one.

Then the cops talk to other people who were in the room and they all agree that yeah, that guy did shoot his wife. And one guy said, "Yeah, I was on the phone with him and he said Hang On, I'm gonna shoot my wife." and I heard the gun shots. I had him on speaker phone at a restaurant and everyone could hear it."

Then the cops talk to the people who were at the table and they all agree that they heard the neighbor say that and it did sound like he'd murdered his wife.

And then the guys lawyer keeps butt dialing the cops and leaving voice records of about how he went and bought that gun and the bullets months ago so his client could murder his wife.

I just wanted to thank you. Nothing demonstrates the batshit craziness of the left better than your wall of gibberish completely devoid of facts here.

there is a lot of it, huh?

Oh, I'll give you the Too Long I read at a 2nd Grade Level Version:

Trump did it. The transcript showed that. All the Witnesses before Congress confirmed it.

The transcript shows he asked a foreign country to investigate evident corruption, which is required under The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. For some reason, you think investigating a criminal becomes a crime when the criminal is running for President, which means you are definitely inbred retarded, and probably a pillhead also. But hey, it's always highly amusing when the double-y troglodyte in the room thinks he's smarter than humans. So please, keep gibbering like a drunk ape.

He didn't ask them to investigate corruption. Not once.

He said "I want you to do us a favor though," then he goes on to talk about Crowdstrike and how there are wealthy Ukrainians. Which is total nonsense. Crowdstrike didn't hide a server anywhere (that's not how servers work). And Ukrainians don't own it.

He also tells the Ukrainian president to call his personal lawyer.

This man is not an employee of the US Government, and specifically the Department of Justice. What authority does he have to be talking to the Ukrainian government about anything?

And what crime are either of the Biden's being investigated for? Exactly what crime?

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977? Yeah. I don't think you know what that covers. That's what makes it illegal for Americans to pay other countries bribes for business deals.

You really really need to read up on the bullshit Fox feeds you. It's not chocolate ice cream.

Did you know the FBI has an entire division of agents already stationed around the world to investigate Americans who may have committed crimes overseas? Yeah, they do! And there are prosecutors that work for the DOJ stationed over there too.

So, if Biden was being investigated there's an entire department of highly trained and experienced investigators to handle it.

NOT an old guy who has been on TV for months prior saying repeatedly that he was Donald Trump's personal lawyer who was going to the Ukraine to dig up dirt on Joe Biden.

If you think anyone is going to read that retarded wall of gibberish on a meme page, you're more stupid than advertised lol
Oh and again, paying bribes to foreign entities is indeed a crime, for example, when you use aid money to help your son's "investment firm" get rich by covering for foreign malfeasance. I can't wait to ignore your next essay, titled "My Va**na Hurts Again!" after Trump wins 2020 in a landslide lol

Exactly

No hearsay, no spin, no bullshit. Abuse of office straight from the horse’s mouth can be found right in the transcript. 3iivlc.jpg (click to show)

you must read funny, cuz I read it, no quid pro quo dude, stop spinning it, you are trying to make me dizzy

Everyone’s arguing vigorously about whether there was a “quid pro quo,” but let’s not forget that’s not the standard for impeachment. I think it was still an abuse of office for Trump to request a foreign country’s judicial resources be devoted to investigating a political opponent’s son. 3igysl.jpg (click to show)

think what you want, no abuse of power, NONE

9 comments it said. All low rated, must be a whole lot of opinions dressed up as facts.

yes, I was wondering why the comments were hidden. most likely no upvotes?

Yeah the ones who agreed on one thing, vote down the stuff they disagree and vice versa. So plenty for up and down. And your first commenter is always pushing the opposite of right leaning ideas or rather pushes the establishment line.

ahh, makes sense. Many on the Left prefer to destroy what they don't agree with

Those are your people, stupid. It's all actors and hoaxes with your insane bunch of freaks

enough with the gd divisions already. the righties here downvote my like candy.... get a grip snowflake

you get a grip

No. The impeachment is like an indictment. The conviction comes after the trial, which hasn't happened yet.

the house may impeach him by a narrow majority, but not gonna happen in the Senate

thats true, but i think the democrats just want this on his transcipt

if you gave a rat's ass about America you would stop watching fake news and pull your head out of you know where

I dont watch news I read it, and when I do watch its not whatever nitwit youtuber youre obviously yanking to.

you assume too much