This is looking good!

I disagree

tulsi and bernie have better chances than the bulk of those democratic hillary superdelegates

Assuming they don't rig it like they did in 2016, which they are. I'm not voting Democrat, but the media refuses to talk about any of the non-establishment candidates like Yang, Gabbard, Bernie or Marianne. I still want to hear their ideas, even if I disagree with them. Yang knows that automation is inevitable, so I want to hear about UBI for when it happens even if I don't think it can happen now. I completely agree with Tulsi on pulling out our troops from the Middle East, and I like what Bernie has to say on college tuition and healthcare.

true.. true... i'm vouching for tulsi and/or yang, though i doubt either will get the nomination thanks to the DNC. I've noticed that on NBC during the debates, the three non-establishment candidates get asked questions that test their loyalty to the DNC rather than actual questions about policy, such as "what would you say to Donald Trump about Russia" and such, which is super irritating.

Yeah you call the Rasmussen poll biased but you post a poll from Washington post abc

Rasmussen is biased AF. Like even Fox is like, "Bruh, are you sure you called someone from outside your office?" level of biased.

Yeah and how many people did they poll in this one?

A random selection of 1040 registered voters. 229 by landline (old people) and 811 by cell phone. The error margin is ±3%.

Or at least according to the documentation provided by Fox.

landline and cell phone... good god. if they went to internet polls, there would be much different results

Seems legit

rasmussen arguably has less bias than washington post

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-post/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rasmussen-reports/

I appreciate what media bias is trying to do, but their process lacks any rigor. It's "armchair expertise" which relies heavily on bias.

LMAO kamala with a friggin 51% chance of beating trump

did you get this poll from msnbc??

Washington Post

aight, same difference

all the respondents were located in Baltimore and Chicago

probably called by landline as well

Seriously , Dude ?

Which more people than voted for him -

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-49-percent-favor-impeaching-trump

when you live 200 years above everyone else

Hope so... but I have concerns for some of the above if they win once the negative ads start blaring (esp. Biden & Warren)

Sure why not. Any of those 5 will be worse for America than what we have now, so keep pushing that sled over the edge

Yes, I never claimed otherwise, but thanks for the reassurance

The Washtrough post and Aybeesee hahaha

I’m still trying to understand just exactly what the dimocrats think he did to change the outcome of the 2016 election. Did he stuff the ballot boxes? Did he hack the voting machines? Did he hold a gun to voters head and tell them they had to vote trump? Given that, what do you think he will do to ruin the election for the dimocrats in 2020

You cant look it up, but you use the term 'dimocrats'? are you 12 years old?

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-yorker/

your own source ... jfc.. smh... ffs...

still ushering people to the left, though

That link is what you are offering as proof? Damn kid, sorry they called you a dimocrat you are actually a moronicat

Deaddd

Dead = dead with laughter sorry!