Mmmmm... Your analogy is flawed with hasty generalizations and has no basis in reality scientifically or statistically. If only 1% of streams owned 90% of stream water, then the other streams wouldn’t be considered streams. In fact 1% of “streams” owning stream water would be considered an ocean.
Which, yes, that is what streams generally flow into. The ocean. So, your analogy, though flawed, basically shows why trickle down economics doesn’t work. If money naturally flows into vast reserves, then it’s essentially moronic to give more money to those who already have it.
You wanna rethink your meme?
