What's the most outlandish conspiracy you ever heard? Not looking for anyone to prove or disprove just curious to hear them.

That would be good one! I've never even watched a single episode of MLP. (even with 4 toddlers in the house ) lol.

Flat earth...

For me 'Flat earth' is hands down the most outlandish conspiracy theory I've ever heard.

I can't even imagine how that one has garnered any followers. But it has, lol

I've noticed on imgflip whenever someone makes a meme about how ridiculous the flat earth theory is. A few flat-earthers will pop up in the comments. When you look at their profiles it seems to be the only thing they comment about. It's weird that people would set up an imgflip account for the sole purpose of spreading their flat earth nonsense.

Flat Earth is a literal religion. And a very meaningless religion, too, because, even if true, it doesn't prove anything other than the Earth's shape. There are no political or any other implications behind it, like there are with Reptillians, Chemtrails, White Genocide, Jewish World Order, The Great Replacement, Fluoride, Big Pharma etc.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rsy5u8LkP-Q

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tAJsHoc6yJw&t=739s

I'm waiting for him to comment but he believes they're all true, lol.

I had a feeling he might have

I never thought about that

;)

Robert morningsky's Orion wars- ancient war between space reptiles and dogs ppl that rules our world and system

Blood over intent cult and travel to North Pole to reach other side of flat earth 2019. quasi is pretty much a cult leader claiming the title of satan. there is a guy going against claiming to be Jesus, really ripped black dude lol. He's been raided and deleted off YouTube but is back on. remade abunch of videos and is fair more tamed, was intense rants and claims, alt history and mix of everything crazy.

Saturnism/cubism

The umbrella academy show is a rip off of a project montauk theory of a guys life and friends. YT Assassins radio or lovebread I think is the name. This guy was crazy and said a lot of intense crap about ppl and groups. Disappeared yrs before the show came out, Jerold butler legit copied chunks from this guy's story

Look at Mecca, that's a cube.

OK so as an athiest, who doesn't believe in God, creation or the Bible you find this outlandish why? Sounds like it's right up your alley.

Do you really think people haven't kept secrets or signed non disclosure agreements. Not arguing that example in particular just overall.

Like I said, I'm not arguing that case but scientists are overwhelmingly atheist, perhaps due to ridicule and discrimination in many cases and if they go against popular opinion they risk getting grants. Look at the dna pioneer that was blacklisted and had his nobel (?) prize, or some high award because he spoke against the transgender agenda, forget his name.

*award taken away

That's true. Alot of older scientists were religious but did good work. I heard a story that all the witnesses to the JFK assassination that called the FBI met sudden ends. Now that may be a conspiracy theory but I don't think it's completely unbelievable. Just look at the Jeffery Epstein situation. There's something fishy yet no one has talked. We are in the dark on alot of major events. Just look at Assad 'gassing' civilians. That was the clearest false flag I've ever seen, and leaked documents from the investigative body that looked into it admitted it was propaganda.

Trust me, I don't push false information. Those 3 'gas attacks' were bullshit. Trump deserves credit for not getting sucked into it. Just the fact someone would do the single thing, as he was winning, that would bring in the military, is completely insane. I know there's alot of conspiracy theories out there but those 'white helmets' were duplicitous scum. Look to the battle of Tonkin Bay if you don't believe high level bullshit doesn't go on.

Or Iran 'suddenly' doing bad things (FINALLY as we have been expecting since 1979) in the Bay of Tohnkine just as we amassed a fleet and 100,000 soldiers ready to go to obliterate them!

Today capped off a really bad week for Trump with 3 Friday super kicks to his miniscule groin.
Wait to see us got to war with Iran as things get heated up here.

I really hope that doesn't happen. I'm pretty paranoid about false flags that might suck into Trump acting emotionally. Republican presidents usually invade some country eventually, I hope Trump can buck that trend. I know you think he's a corrupt piece of garbabe but I really think he doesn't want to be responsible for the death of his soldiers. But I understand if you feel differently.

He just effectively sentenced possibly thousands of Kurds to a massacre because a despot told him to in a phone call.
He's a narcissitic sociopath. Soldiers - including those from 'his' army - have as much value to him as tissue paper.

Trump has avoided war, although his poorly picked advisers have told him otherwise. We'll have to agree to disagree.

Didn't 'Fire & Fury' Trump wage war on and eliminate the ISIL that Obama created because, um, why DID he create them again? That was Iraq, then there was Syria, where we lost 6 soldiers, unlike the sloppy Kurds who lost 11,000 fighting Trump's war...
Not to mention Yemen, because the Saudis want us to fight over a useless heap of gravel so dry, the bedrock is literally cracking from aquifers being drained by wells to grow qat.

Those are 3 wars Trump takes credit for. Sure, they're about as awesome as Cowboy Ron's amazing Grenada muscle flex, but war IS war.

Can't credit someone for doing something then claim he never did it.

Plus is the Commander in Twitter Chief that somehow has Gov't & Courts & even Fox News (bye, Sheppy, bye) cowering in such fear of his 'wrath' really going to obey Bolton's wishes? It's not like Bolton is a dictator in some right wing despot like Trump adores and aims to please.

"Source: Scientists data from Pew Research Center for the People & the Press survey, conducted in May and June 2009; for complete question wording, see survey topline. General public data from Pew Research Center survey conducted in July 2006; for complete question wording, see survey topline. Numbers may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

The recent survey of scientists tracks fairly closely with earlier polls that gauged scientists’ views on religion. The first of these was conducted in 1914 by Swiss-American psychologist James Leuba, who surveyed about 1,000 scientists in the United States to ask them about their views on God. Leuba found the scientific community equally divided, with 42% saying that they believed in a personal God and the same number saying they did not.

More than 80 years later, Edward Larson, a historian of science then teaching at the University of Georgia, recreated Leuba’s survey, asking the same number of scientists the exact same questions. To the surprise of many, Larson’s 1996 poll came up with similar results, finding that 40% of scientists believed in a personal God, while 45% said they did not. Other surveys of scientists have yielded roughly similar results.

Given their much lower levels of belief in God or a higher power, it is not surprising that the percentage of scientists who are unaffiliated with any religion is much higher than among the general public. Nearly half of all scientists in the 2009 Pew Research Center poll (48%) say they have no religious affiliation (meaning they describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or nothing in particular), compared with only 17% of the public. Thus, it follows that most faith traditions are represented in smaller numbers in the scientific community than in the public as a whole. For instance, the scientific community is far less Protestant (21%) and Catholic (10%) than the general public, which is 51% Protestant and 24% Catholic. And while evangelical Protestants make up more than a fourth of the general population (28%), they make up only a small slice (4%) of the scientific community. One notable exception is Jews, who make up a larger proportion of the scientific community (8%) than the general population (2%)."

https://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

I remember hearing about this back then. Was a surprise because the expectation was with science guiding our path, over years religious belief would decline, ultimately disappear among scientists.

Ran out of room to type, and it was late, but yeah, the trend defied predictions...

haha, scientists use to think we could populate Venus and destroyed the man that said It wasn't as old as we thought and was still hot. regardless of how many other claims he made to be true or even got credit for any. Still black balled, best seller cleared off shelf in the 50's. Got to protect your work, others that your work is tied to, Your funding, sometimes keeping a foreign opinion to retain your job.

Remember smoking doesn't cause cancer, safe smokes are fake, no effects from Arctic oil rigging. Royal rife machine doesn't work. Einstein didn't plagiarize and work is complete. Gravity is more important than dielectric. Chronology is spot on, tesla' death ray/lcc scalar is fake and not used today, great flood never happened. You can go on and on but it's just old standards that sometimes get improved

Scientist still argue about everything lol, and patent trolls and inventions getting classified regardless of how useful it is.
The reality is improving humanity doesn't mean shit.

There is a documentary on Netflix that fits this issue, merchants of doubt. Ppl being payed for a fake opinions or data suppression or to fake being a scientist in gereral

I believe those organizations exist, but I don't believe they are doing what that conspiracy theory indicates.

Yep, there's a masons lodge right up the street from my house. What you are saying goes in line with what I think as well.

I've seen you say you look for scientific evidence before believing in things, I'm curious, would God be God if we could prove him scientifically? The very nature of God I think is not meant to be understood. Otherwise, we could understand God, and become gods ourselves which I think would be very dangerous.

Is there a natural god?

As far as use, I dont think we are intended to use God, but his benevolence proves helpful time and again. For what reason? I have no idea, but I'm thankful for it. It is a mystery, maybe that's why you struggle with it...cant solve it :)

Not preaching at you here at all, you have to find your own way, with or without God, that's the beauty of free will. I just find it's easier with Him at my side.

*Insert crazy religious guy quote here*, lol, by all accounts of many in history, we ARE crazy, I'm ok with that :)

Cheers.

From what I've understood, Freemasonry is an occult organization heavily inspired by the Kaballah (Jewish mysticism), whose doctrines include Natural Law and Gematria (Numerology). True or not?

Ahh, too bad. I was hoping to learn more about Freemasonry from someone who had the first-hand experience with them. Can you at least tell me what are the other requirements?

You can worship 'the architect', or Lucifer. But there's also that pesky good moral character issue :P (j/k)

I guess what I'm saying is that it goes against the very nature of God to be bound to the rules of this universe. So how do you prove that with science?

"True, good, accurate, or beneficial?" Its all about the relationship. As a Christian, looking through the Bible you will find a God (I believe THE God) that's desires a loving relationship. Just as relationships between us humans go, we deem something as described with the words you used based on our experiences with each other. I love my dad, and vice versa, so if he gave me a bottle I'd trust there was something good in it. Like fine whiskey ;)

But the question one should ask is "why". Why cant God exists. I know you'll say not scientifically possible. But what does it hurt to say he does. My question is this who created life, and if this creator created why cant he be in charge and make the rules if he did create a universe.

So i know you're not convinced that there is a God but may i ask is there something more here. Are you afraid that if God should exist that you would be guilty?

Hey thats fine if you choose to believe that and i won't judge.

What's in it for the scientists? I know many dispute the creation story vs. big bang, etc. but I can't imagine a hoard of scientists banding together to hide that...interesting.

I guess that's the point of a conspiracy theory, you're not supposed to know why! I'll go as far as to say that's a stretch...My dad was a science teacher, I'm an engineer, I've done a lot of scientific things in my life and researched and learned many things about scientists and what they do/have done. That goes against the core characteristics of science, the whole point is to discover new things to benefit man and the earth.

Not all of us are atheists :)

A lil spice here

Lol

Ha

[image deleted]I dont know man. LOL