Democrat Irony

I think that was intentional.

You do have a Strange Love attitude when you would embrace Russia and not the U. S. and her accomplishments. The Democrats are Socialists and Communists. What made you hate America so much?

First of all, petty insults directed at my name? tsk tsk. Secondly, you make a lot of assumptions in your first comment directed toward me.

You think I like pirates and thugs and thieves because I posted as Captain Jack? And I hate America because? What? I responded to your meme? LOL That's really reaching dude. About as much reaching as me thinking it odd that your meme conveniently displays the Russian Federation colors. The "comrade" jab was directed at you being a potential Russian Troll using subliminal imagery to convey your message. But I see I was giving you too much credit. (:

Democrats are not Communists. People who do not understand the difference between Communism and Socialism should really stick to memes. Or better yet, go read a few books. But I'll be happy to tell you, that Democrats do believe in social systems such as social security and medicare and medicaid. As far as I know, none of them are actually advocating for complete socialist system. A small group of them are for expanding social programs into healthcare and education. Which is a very noble goal, but I could understand someone with a rational mind feeling a bit hesitant about how our government would be able to implement those programs with competency and efficiency. Too bad I don't really see you having the ability to have a rational discussion, but you're very welcome to try.

Too funny...my husband had left this article up for me to read this morning and I just ran across it, Dr. Strangelove. Thought you might enjoy it as you are in denial of the truth... https://www.trevorloudon.com/2019/02/trevor-loudons-2019-list-of-socialists-and-communists-in-congress/?fbclid=IwAR0SjmD7V-JhTSdrl4pchPFEZkWMi97ErGNQdQLyaQ86XaNQ2NCj4aFsWZw

Somehow you think that "As far as I know, none of them are actually advocating for complete socialist system." You might benefit by knowing that that is the "minimum" standard these radicals attempt to impose on America. I can tell you are not an uneducated man, Dr. S., and if you check out Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, Col. Allen West, Walter Williams, Tucker Carlson, Ted Cruz, Judge Jeanine Pirro (to name only a few), and want to leave the dark side, we would welcome you on the right. Cheers!

How is it "noble" to forgive student debts for some and not others or to take hard-earned taxpayer dollars to subsidize illegal aliens or LIE as the candidates are doing instead of admitting they would BANKRUPT our COUNTRY? The "small group" of candidates you allude to is really "all of 'em" as they ALL raised their hands in unison to support outrageous invasion and subsidy of PERSONS WHO ARE NOT EVEN CITIZENS who broke the law to get and remain here! Define CRAZY and you will find Progressive Democrats at the top of the list.

I said, "The Democrats are Socialists and Communists." Absolute truth although you do not agree as you said, "Democrats are not Communists" (after watching a little too much CNN). If you don't think Bernie is a Con, I mean Communist, check out his background since we were talking about Strange Love. Who else would choose the old Soviet Union as a perfect place for a 'honeymoon'? He has always had a weakness for Communist dictatorships.

Progressives today are radicals who love dependence and "freebies" as evidenced by the quality of persons following the DemoRats' cockamamie agenda (open borders, no free speech unless you are a liberal, guns and Orange Man bad, pussy hats instead of hard hats, perversion in the libraries with innocent children at stake, tax, tax, and more tax, etc. Btw, Russian trolls would more likely align with you than they ever would with me, Dr. Strangelove. I know I won't change your thought processes any more than you will change mine (thank goodness) so will bid you adieu as I have other obligations in life than to attempt to understand the liberal mind. Good luck in your endeavors....

You have a rather bad and stupid habit of lying about what others say and stand for.

Don't like socialist programs? Unplug from the system and pay for it yourself, DONE!
Don't like them Ruskies, then perhaps cheering for someone who doesn't bow to former KGB Putin?

LOL, I’m a conservative you crazy nut! Have a good one.

Yes, by having an anarchist society!

Same answer I gave to Mario...

No, I believe in law, order & decency...not pirates, thugs and thieves. You believe in BLM, antifa, abolition of police & border patrols and chaos.

How about we use anarchy to abolish both forms of ID?

If we had anarchy we will not need to vote a president to begin with! Nor money to rob the stores for guns! :D

The money would actually stay, unless it’s anarcho-communism.

Seen first of the North Star anime. In a chaotic future money ain't worth crap if you can simply shoot whoever's has something you want and simply take it from the dead body. That is anarchy. There is no such thing as anarcho-communis since they contradict eachother.

Or everyone can use the bartering system. Or because all gold is worth the same, someone can make a world-standardized gold currency. Anarcho-communism is not an oxymoron, but it cannot last long because folks will eventually want to trade.

I think gold will have no value since it is not a necessity for survival. In a world without laws it is survival of the fittest. Currency it is way is a form of law and restriction. You can't have what you can't afford, but hey it only takes one bullet and a well aimed shot to get it for free when there are no laws. I am referring to true anarchy, I don't know which kind of quasi anarchy you are referring to, but it is not pure, you dilute it with your wishful thinking.

Do you really think everyone is gonna shoot each other when everyone is armed?! The areas with the least gun control have the least shootings!

I am talking about anarchy here, there is no gun control. Survival of the fittest. You do know that the definition of anarchy is complete lack of law. When there is no law there is no order. Chaos is a result of anarchy. Give man power and see how far they can go.

I said that since everyone in an anarchy should be armed, no one is going to bother risking his life for free stuff. It’s usually gun-free zones that get shot.

You will hope. If that was the case, sleep with one eye open because the moment you close them both you are gone. And that is why we have laws, because they are needed. They are there to protect you. However, too many laws could end up in a dictatorship. When the government controls every phase of your life. So, it is best to have a balance of laws and freedom for a society to be successful. Back to the article is clear that is hypocritical that the democrats want power by getting questionable votes while controlling the citizens armaments so that they can't fight back.

If you’re afraid of getting shot upon going to sleep, you can USE A LOCK on your bedroom door! Besides, your body would start to smell, and your neighbors would want to do an autopsy, where they find out who killed you.

Even small government is able to grow like a cancer. Look what happened to America!

Which country of America? Venezuela was doing pretty well until they went socialist. Mexico is one of the richest country, Argentina, Panama, Belieze doing really well. Honduras has highest homicide rate next is Brazil, but people in the USA care more about middle eastern muslims than those people in Honduras or Brazil, and for that matter neither does any other country in South, North, Central America or the caribean. Noone cares about Brazil and poor Honduras. They care more about muslims and the human waste from Mexico... a rich country with good economy.

No, I believe in law, order & decency...not pirates, thugs and thieves. You believe in BLM, antifa, abolition of police & border patrols and chaos.

I never said that I believe in Antifa! If your morals are so correct, why does an authority figure need to enforce them instead of people using guns to enforce morals? That’s where the non-aggression principle comes into play. Anarchy means freedom, not chaos. If humans are inherently evil, the last thing you want to do is let them rule over other humans.

Mario, anarchy means "A state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority."

You said, "Anarchy means freedom, not chaos." In no way does anarchy mean 'freedom' and 'chaos' naturally follows disorder. My morals are correct...I don't have so much as a parking ticket against my name in 67 years of living. I am not the problem but people who do not follow our laws and Constitution are the problem.

You say you don't believe in Antifa, so by process of elimination that means you do believe in the other things I listed...BLM, abolition of police & border patrols and chaos...SMH.

“Chaos” is just one definition because that’s how folks like to use the word. When going by the Greek roots, the literal definition of “an-archy” is simply the lack of a leader.

“My morals are correct…”
How can you be so sure that your morals are correct when you need an authority to enforce them, instead of leaving it up to the majority of the people to decide? And if their morals are flawed, they should simply suffer the consequences so they’ll rethink those morals, right?

“I am not the problem, but people who do not follow our laws and constitution are the problem.”
And that’s exactly what the government does. The longer a government reigns, the more it violates freedom. Government grows like a tumor; therefore, small government is a half-assed excuse against anarchy. Nothing stops the government from doing wrong.

Antifa is not an anarchist gang because it seeks gun control. I already told you why we don’t need police.

Registering to vote requires basic common sense (something Progressives were not gifted unfortunately). The right to vote includes Americans and not illegals.

Registering guns should not be required if Progressives understood basic history or historical facts.

You ever even been remotely close to the USofA?

1. United Statians have to REGISTER to vote.
2. United Statians who are registered to vote RECIEVE Voter ID.
3. Unitied Statians who do 1. & 2. ALREADY ARE citizens, as required by law.

Not sure what "pwogwessivez" have to do with that process, Vlady, but there is basically how it works.

Oh, and save them gunz is for when Unitied Statians get conscripted as militia, you know, when needed for the security of the State.

You capicheing me on this, or would you require a GPS to sort out the basics?