to accept your premise we would predispose that the equation is liberal vs conservative.
this is a false dichotomy.
a judge who pushes a conservative,or liberal "agenda" is a corrupt judge pushing political agendas over the law.
Antonin scalia was the deciding judge on 2009's "citizens united" and was almost singlehandedly responsible for hammering the last nail in this republics coffin.essentially handing over this republic to the oligarchs.
was this a conservative judgement?
liberal?
or maybe it was simply a blatant sign of his corruption,and him identifying as a conservative is only a tertiary consideration.now he defended his decision until his dying day,but the effects of his decision are still rippling..and growing...
I don't see trumps appointments doing anything different than obamas,or bushs for that matter.
they know who they serve.