Christine Jorgensen, Virginia Prince, the Cooper Do-Nuts riot, pretty much anyone who was cast in an Ed Wood film

https://i.imgflip.com/38aydj.jpg

So delusional, they kept it away from kids.

Don't listen to mikkiscorpion. See all the other comments that say otherwise.

I absolutely do not engage with trolls, and imgflip has a few members who apparently do nothing but troll 24x7.

if it happens in the 50s, then it's obviously true

Did any of those people reproduce? Flawed genetics echo through eternity.

Do you have a point or just esoteric subjections?

I identify as a flagpole...care for a ride?

Shud it, Octavia. It was a mental disorder then, and it still is today, regardless of what pop science has to say. No matter how much you believe your DNA is wrong, your DNA gives zero f**ks about what you think. Deal wit it, neotard.

top 10 epic liberal destructions

Don't take my word for it. I don't make DNA, nor do I have the ability to change it, as you don't either. Your gayness is a mental disorder, too. Homosexuality is a ragged attempt to defy the laws of nature, being nothing more than a contradiction of itself, steeped in logical inconsistencies. Giving into one's own unnatural desires is not only destructive to the individual, but to society as a whole. It slowly breaks down the natural order of things, where man thinks himself to be the arbiter of all things, including rights.

There is a natural reason why these behaviors were kept in the closet. Because even many of those who were in the closet about it, knew full well it was unnatural and that it breaks down the fabric of society. Look to Rome and what led to its demise. The unnatural was forced to be accepted at the sake of the natural.

Go ahead and put your liberal progressive spin on it all you want, but you'll never be able to polish shit.

Just as I suspected. Spin in full effect.

Homosexuality, among other destructive behaviors helped in the fall of Rome; it wasn't its sole cause.

It is destroying this country, too. It all started with so-called "gay rights" and has extended well past logic and reason.

You conveniently skip over swaths of information when it contradicts your worldview, deeping your ignorance.

I doubt you'll read into it, as I said, you conveniently skip over anything that challenges your depraved worldview, but I'll post these links, anyhow. Perhaps someone will read them and be less ignorant.

https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/02/14305/
https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/pelosis-equality-act-could-lead-more-parents-losing-custody-kids-who
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/paglia-transgender-civilizations-decline/
https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/sex-reassignment-doesnt-work-here-the-evidence

One of those articles is from a lesbian. You dumb faq didn't even read them, just as I suspected. I purposely included that one as I knew you'd take the route you took.

We all have equal rights under the Constitution. What you and your ilk seek is special rights to stroke your delicate feelings, forcing others to accept your depraved behavior. Your virtue signaling is nauseating.

There's no "in other words". Sexual deviancy, whether hetero or homo, is just that, deviant. A debased mind has taken over. Your humanism has blinded you to complete ignorance with regard to human nature.

That's why we have civil courts. Again, every minority group, including the poor, from which I am a part, cry for special treatment, because of real and imagined discrimination. Heeping on more laws does no one any good. The beauty of free markets is if someone doesn't wanna do business with ya, ya can go elsewhere. Sadly, because of government intrusion, free markets aren't able to fully operate within their scope. This goes for the Constitution, as well.

If you're asking, you're not as objective as you purport.

Instead of taking their business elsewhere, they force a bakery to bake a wedding cake for a gay marriage. Forcing a business to exchange property, when the business doesn't want to, is unconstitutional. Period. That's seeking special rights, special treatment. That doesn't how free markets work. Try reading Ludwig Van Mises, ya might learn something.

And again, you're not as objective as you purport.

*Von Mises

Some were, yes. The race baiters who profit from it. But, again, a free market would sort this out. I'm not a fan of any Civil Rights laws. There's a mixture of redundancy and unconstitutionality. And to compare acted upon behavior, to skin color is a smack in the face to those who've suffered greatly because of how they look. There's nothing unnatural about pigmentation; there's everything unnatural about a man taking it in the ass by another man, and two women scissoring each other.

But, no matter what anyone says about the depravity of such behavior, you'll discount it. Therefore, I say it in vain. You've been given up to your debased mind.

Here's something ya might like to discount:

https://deeprootsathome.com/pediatricians-call-gender-ideology-what-it-is-child-abuse/

You seem to be confused as usual.
Which part in the Meme that says "Said no one ever" And your own statement pointing out "They weren't open about it" Has you confused?

This is the second time you've destroyed your own idiot narrative all on your own.
Keep begging for attention Octavia.

You're sure... A transgendered man gave birth?, Or a transgendered woman impregnated another woman? Where did this world shattering event take place? The empty space between your ears?
No...?
So being transgendered didn't stop the gender confused from procreating with the appropriate genders, Got it.

You can't seem to think at all. Show me a list of all the males who gave birth. What's that... NONE? How about a list of all the females who knocked anyone up? What? Not one? It looks like males are males and females are females, The rest are just confused people with an IQ as low as yours.

So you agree, Men have a p**is and impregnate women , Women have a va**na and give birth, All others are mentally challenged about sex and genders.Got it.

You don't have the sack to say only Men have a p**is and impregnate women, And only Women have a va**na and give birth. You don't want to offend your peers.

I know you didn't, You don't have the intelligence to understand it.

Except that a transgender "woman" is still a man, and vice-versa.

Were there mentally ill liberals identifying as unicorns too?
I know you think there were, They weren't open about it.
Children don't count, It's why conservatives say liberals lack the ability to grow up.