No more Ars

you forgot flat earth, chemtrail, 9/11, Q and fake moon landing

I think people can determine their own needs. Do you like to be punished for something someone else did? I think not. What if they decided to rid imgflip of politics entirely because of the trolls that roll through here, thus silencing you. I know you would be pissed. And no, that's not the same THING but the same IDEA. Punishing everyone for the actions of a few.

You cant have an ar so you are being punished? you cant have a grenade, are you being punished? you cant even have LAWN DARTS ..are you being punished..... get a grip... we dont care if you feel like you need a weapon of war you dont, and like darts they need to go.

If the reason mine was taken away is because someone else committed a crime. Yes I am. If you took my car because the guy down the road plowed into a sidewalk full of people yes that is punishing me for his crime. How do we address the mental problems and side effects from medications for said mental problems. I would love to hear your thoughts. You never really address that, but I am genuinely interested in your thoughts there.

Fine, thought number one.... When you fine folks bring up cars, or knives, or any number of stupid comparisons, it makes me want to slap you and walk away because you dont even have the fundamental understanding needed to discuss the issue.

1) The second does NOT guarantee a gun but since it never really was an issue before, many just let it slide. That needs to stop since the gun folks cant seem to agree to simple regulations and scream but but but but 'hit and run with a car',,,, now its become a problem.

2) Regardless of #1 NO ONE needs an assault weapon that ONLY has one reason for existence and that is to kill as MANY HUMANS as is possible in the shortest amount of time.

MORE MASS SHOOTINGS than DAYS in the YEAR...... ENOUGH.

And little ol' me . 😃

The reason people bring those things up is not to COMPARE but rather make the point that the manner in which people die, not the fact that they died seems important. No one is seriously saying let's take knives, cars, alcohol, etc... If they are serious in that then yes, they are idiots. But you seem intelligent. I am surprised you don't what the actual intent is behind that. But I digress....

I am not speaking on the second amendment. THAT is irrelevant. Because interpretation is subjective in these arguments. So not gonna even talk about that.

And two, That is also irrelevant.

You avoided the question again. I want to be clear in what I am asking. Say that today they decided that no one could own a firearm other than police, military, or security personnel. And I mean NO GUNS EXIST out side of that. (I know it's a stretch, but bear with me here...) And you get crazies out here setting off bombs, or going on stabbing sprees. How do we address the problem at that point? I know you want to come back at me with exactly the same things you usually, but I honestly would like you to think on that. How would we address mass killings in the absence of fire arms? What would we do? How would you like to see it handled? Thoughtful discussion here. And no, this isn't a trap.

jfc... this is why there is no point THERE IS A REASON HAND GRENADES DONT GO OFF..... A REASON THAT FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS ARE NOT USED IN MASS SHOOTINGS.....AND .... AND,,,, NO ONE EVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT ALL GUNS.... good day. ....

That made no sense. I am attempting an actual discussion here. Don't you think it's worth addressing? Worth thinking about? I gave you a hypothetical. I did not say that YOU said all guns should be banned. I am saying just suppose we were not allowed fire arm access. Just a what if. How do we address the other ways these crazy people find to kill others? You really aren't interested in looking at that? Guns aside. I am not asking you to change your stance, (I am not even arguing with your stance) or waiver in your political leanings or convictions. Because I feel this aspect goes beyond politics. Beyond the constitution. Beyond the run-of-the-mill argument. Can you stop arguing long enough to talk about this?

*strong suit

I don't think our having a discussion here is going to cause people to die "out there". I guess communicating isn't your string suit. I did try though. I wasn't actually interested in a debate, just a discussion. Let me know if you change your mind and want to speak on the points I attempted.

Sorry. You don't want to speak on what I asked about. Unless you care to do that now I have no more time for you. Because you have proven you are not concerned in real solutions, and getting to the root cause of all the gun violence in the first place. We went over 300 years with people having free access to all kinds of fire arms. This is a new problem. And the firearm is not to blame. Until people are willing to look to the CAUSE rather than the means, we will stay right where we are.

Why dont you spend some time in a safe country, like Japan? or Syria by comparison the way its going.

I am sorry that you insist upon ignorance. I am also sure the only reason you came back to argue NOW is because you ran out of arguments elsewhere and this is just a filler for you. Let me know when you want to discuss what I talked about.

Guns don't jump off the shelf and start shooting people. Guns don't cause the violence, the person behind the trigger does. A gun is just a tool.

I can't decide if your ignorance and pompous attitude is humorous or sad.

Maga

First off, you should be happy with Trump, since he's pushing the Red Flag Laws. But I guess you can't give him any credit for anything even when he does something, or pushes for something, you agree with him on. You're just a douche who hates and it shows.

Second, you have no clue to why the gun murder rates are so high in the United States. The numbers are highly deceptive and you don't know jack shit. Let me clue you in on something...

Take away the major cities (Chicago, Detroit and New Orleans for example), all with major gun restriction laws, and gun crime doesn't look so bad here. But I know you already know this, but you're too daft to even comprehend.

You should submit that.

I can't stop laughing...

itg

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/us/politics/fact-check-parkland-gun-violence-mental-illness.html

Some further research:

A 2016 academic study estimated that just 4 percent of violence is associated with serious mental illness alone. “Evidence is clear that the large majority of people with mental disorders do not engage in violence against others, and that most violent behavior is due to factors other than mental illness,” the study concluded.
A 2015 study found that less than 5 percent of gun-related killings in the United States between 2001 and 2010 were committed by people diagnosed with mental illness.

Ah. But you see kids are supervised during recess (and in fact in most situations) because they are kids. So you notice a problem and you easily stop them. Because they are kids.

So what are we going to make everyone wear diapers because babies poop themselves?

Do babies use diapers to harm other babies?

Two babies enter. One baby leaves.