Imgflip Logo Icon

He knows what he's doing

He knows what he's doing | MEAN TWEETS; TRUMP; DEMS; THAT SHOULD KEEP THEM BUSY | image tagged in memes,politics,trump,cat chasing laser | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,141 views 57 upvotes Made by JakkFrost 5 years ago in politics
68 Comments
9 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Smug Trump | LOL | image tagged in smug trump | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Even Tim Pool gets it. Well, after he tweeted about it.
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
lol yeah, his video is what gave me the idea for this, though for some reason it took over 6 hours between submission and getting featured...
9 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Did you see Pool at the wh? During the media summit? He brought the beanie and was the only one not in a suit. Then he left early because it was too hot. lol
7 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Nope, didn't actually see the summit, but I'm not surprised about the beanie. Little surprised he didn't wear a suit though, although maybe it was sort of a passive-aggressive form of protest, since he doesn't actually support Trump.
8 ups, 5y
I bet he has that nailed in!

Good point. But I'm starting to wonder if he's not a little more right than he lets on. Sitting on the fence (kinda) gives him both sides of his audience, well, the rational ones.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yeah, well here's MY new one too, lol

imgflip.com/i/35xf7b

Made that late last night, but goofed and submitted it then too, instead of this morning *sigh*
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Nice.

You find early morning submissions get more views?
1 up, 5y
Seems to generally be the best time, the beginning of the day for North America, though sometimes you get lucky at other times.
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Has everyone forgotten that one of these people referred to President Trump as a "motherf**ker?"

This tweet did not occur in a vaccuum. It is part of the ongoing political attacks that both sides are engaging in. And the Democrats keep falling for it! If you want to beat Trump, ignore the ad hominems and opinions, forget ideology. Stick to demonstrable, documented facts and go after him on the issues. Don't be a cast member in his reality shitshow.

I say that openly because I know the Dems won't listen, and that's fine with me. I'm not rich, I'm concerned about having enough to retire, and since Trump has been in office my retirment accounts have soared.
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Now you don't care about words. Kek.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Well a) Its the President. You should be able to insult him. And B) There is a difference between profanity and telling Americans, living and working in America, to go back home
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You should be able to insult /anybody/. That's called free speech.

And what difference is there, apart from literal content? Both are insulting. You either allow both, or you make both illegal.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Again. One is just profanity, While the other fundamentally attacks the accused.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You don't think claiming someone has incestuous sexual relations with his own mother is a fundamental attack?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No. That would be a personal attack
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Certainly a far more vicious attack than simply telling someone to "go back where you came from".
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
He never said that. He's never told them to leave. He said they could if they were so unhappy.

Don't fall into the trap. He'll be misquoted on this as usual.
3 ups, 5y
True, though I'm not saying Trump said it, I'm saying that, objectively, "motherf**ker" is a much "meaner" thing to say than the phrase "go back where you came from" that Gylbert is mendaciously getting his panties in a bunch over.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"Oh no the mean women used a bad word"

Hypocrisy much?
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Well a) Its the President. You should be able to insult him. And B) There is a difference between profanity and telling Americans, living and working in America, to go back home
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Wtf. Name me another congress member that's called a president that in public?

You know, you can keep pushing your narrative but as we've all told you, he INVITED them to leave if they didn't like America, not TOLD.

I know there's a language difference but you're making me wonder.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"he INVITED them to leave if they didn't like America, not TOLD."

Same message

"Wtf. Name me another congress member that's called a president that in public?"

Fair point. Politicians holding public office shouldn't swear as it sets a bad example.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Come to think of it, in point of fact, the concept of trying out a new idea on a smaller scale first is a very corporate business practice; a young employee brings an idea for a product or a new procedure to his higher-ups, and they say "try it out on a small scale first, some small town or subsidiary company. If it works there, come back to us and we'll implement it on a larger scale".

So it's something entirely natural for a businessman like Trump to say, despite the somewhat tone-deaf nature of the way he phrased it.
0 ups, 5y
aha
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
I like this one too
1 up, 5y
Thanks ;)
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
9 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Telling? This is the typical thing. He never told anyone anything. He INVITED people to leave America if all they do is call America evil and immoral. What's so hard to grasp about that? Everyone in America has ancestral land (s) they came from.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
" He INVITED people to leave America if all they do is call America evil and immoral."

Ah, but he told them to leave if they didn't think America was great and needed Change. This part is added on.
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Sure. He thinks anyone who doesn't think America is perfect should leave...

No, he just doesn't like people that HATE America.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
"no, he just doesn't like people that HATE America."

Good. Because no American seriously hates America
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Uhhhh... I gotta tell you. You're 100% wrong about that. These 4 want to make America into an open border welfare state and seriously hates the America of today and yesterday. I've only seen antifa cucks hate America as much. They make Obama look like a staunch patriot.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
"They make Obama look like a staunch patriot."

Obama is the one who set into motion Ilhan Omar getting election by stuffing Minnesota with a bunch of Somalian muslims illegally.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Also can we shortly acknowledged that Trump told members of Congress, whose entire job is to help run America, that he is sick of hearing them tell him how to run the country?
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Fair point but hardly anything out of the norm in the partisan politics of today.

Although he did preface it with loudly and viscously. And these 4, well, at least 3 are all extremely viscous. Did you see AOC get destroyed by Holman?
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
" Did you see AOC get destroyed by Holman?"

No
4 ups, 5y,
2 replies
https://youtu.be/KApn4tAaq4s
5 ups, 5y
Yeah, he's actually seen that before, at least assuming he watched the video I linked him, though he could be forgiven for not knowing who Homan is or what exactly you were referring to.
0 ups, 5y
Oh that guy.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Everyone seems to miss how he also invited them to come back in the same tweet series.

And it's funny how they go on and on about their original heritage, until Trump made that tweet, then suddenly they're American. And then of course there's the fact that Puerto Rico is part of the US, so AOC had nothing to get upset about anyways.
2 ups, 5y,
4 replies
"Everyone seems to miss how he also invited them to come back in the same tweet series."

Quize sure that was an after thought and only came after the backlash

"And it's funny how they go on and on about their original heritage"

Aha go on

"until Trump made that tweet, then suddenly they're American"

Three of them are America born Citizens and all of the are US Citizens. They might have had diffrent and diverse backgrounds, but they are all American. And it is a disgace and bigotted to tell Amdrican Citizens living and born in America to go back home.

"And then of course there's the fact that Puerto Rico is part of the US, so AOC had nothing to get upset about anyways."

Wait a Minute... you don't think three of the four werent born in the US *Narrows eyes Suspiciously*
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
When you haven't EVEN READ THE TWEETS, why do you think you know anything about this? ffs
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
5 ups, 5y
Okay? That shows both were included in the same tweet.

Thanks... I guess?
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"Quize sure that was an after thought and only came after the backlash"

No, it was part of the original series of tweets. Basically, "go back to your home countries and apply your policies there, get them to work, and then come back and tell us how it's done". It was not simply "go back where you came from ya dang foreigners" like the left is harping on about.

And don't put false words in my mouth, you specifically quoted me saying they go on about their "/original/ heritage", not their "nation of birth". Of course they're all American now, so perhaps they should talk about how they're American all the time, and not just when Trump riles them up.
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
""go back to your home countries and apply your policies there, get them to work, and then come back and tell us how it's done". It was not simply "go back where you came from ya dang foreigners" like the left is harping on about."

yeah no, pretty sure that just means go back to where you came from and apply your policies there. That invite to come back is a lose at best

"Of course they're all American now, so perhaps they should talk about how they're American all the time, and not just when Trump riles them up."

Tgere is nothing wrong with talking about where ones family came from before entering America and becoming American. And I am sure they talk about being American as much as you do. And they shouldn't need to do so, because I think its a given that they are Americans.

I don't think they need to remind us of /that/ fact
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"yeah no, pretty sure that just means go back to where you came from and apply your policies there. That invite to come back is a lose at best"

Hate to break it to you, but that is textbook "seeing what you WANT to see".

And yeah, there's nothing wrong with talking about your heritage. It's one thing to have your heritage as part of your identity, it's another thing entirely to /use/ your heritage in identity politics, as a means to get ahead, to be "the first something-or-other", and shut down your opponents.

Take Hillary for example. She ran almost entirely on the idea of being "the first female president", and on what a misogynistic male Trump is, even though he hadn't actually said or done anything particularly sexist, let alone misogynistic. One locker-room comment that any man could easily have made does not make him the epitome of "hatred of women". Now if Hillary had just tried to campaign on policy instead of identity politics, she probably would have won.

Then again, maybe not. Her policy plans would have had the US in actual war with Russia by now.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
"Hate to break it to you, but that is textbook "seeing what you WANT to see"."

Either way. Still offensive af

"And yeah, there's nothing wrong with talking about your heritage. It's one thing to have your...(Thing about identity politics)"

Yeah fair fair enough

"Take Hillary for example."

Yes. I agree with you on this one

"Then again, maybe not. Her policy plans would have had the US in actual war with Russia by now."

Heh
6 ups, 5y,
2 replies
"Either way. Still offensive af"

If that were true, then why the need to twist the narrative?

" "Then again, maybe not. Her policy plans would have had the US in actual war with Russia by now."

Heh"

Well it's true. She wanted to take over (aka invade) Syrian airspace, it was part of her platform, despite the fact that generals had testified in congressional hearings that doing so would unavoidably cause a war with Russia. Not "might", "/would/".
7 ups, 5y
She also said she would go to war with Iran.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
"If that were true, then why the need to twist the narrative?"

What do you mean
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
If it's "still offensive af", why the need to conveniently ignore the part where he invited them to come back again, or to try to claim it was "an after thought and only came after the backlash".
0 ups, 5y
"why the need to conveniently ignore the part where he invited them to come back again"

Because it would assume that they aren't American
3 ups, 5y
"Because it would assume that they aren't American"

Are you even /trying/ to remember the train of the discussion now?
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"yeah no, pretty sure that just means go back to where you came from and apply your policies there. That invite to come back is a lose at best"

So you're just assuming he meant that.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
And your assuming that he didn't
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I know exactly what he meant by it .
0 ups, 5y
Of course you do.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Also, you're completely missing the point of the meme, in that Trump got them paying attention to his "mean tweets", instead of to policies he's putting in place while they're not looking.

As the saying goes, "he's playing them like a fiddle".
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Well its less policies and mkre his Epstein connection
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
That's just the left trying to do the same, "look over here at what Trump's doing, and forget about us!"
0 ups, 5y
Perhaps
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Keep thinking that.
1 up, 5y
I will ;)
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You might find this interesting, turns out it goes a lot further than Trump just distracting dems with a laser pointer so he can push some policies through.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rJ7SLiLBgs
0 ups, 5y
Hmm
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 2
  • thought balloon-md.png
  • cat laser.JPG
  • trump-border-security.jpg
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    MEAN TWEETS; TRUMP; DEMS; THAT SHOULD KEEP THEM BUSY