Not a deflection, it stands to my first point, which was "if it's on the internet it must be true" or in this case "if it's in a textbook it must be true". Both are equally incorrect.
[deleted]
2 ups, 6y
Yeah ok. Textbooks that are used in colleges and education based environments. They’re obviously fake right?
This is such an idiotic argument. Racists don't want to be around the people they hate (just like non-racists), and therefor will do only the minimum required in hiring. 'Covert Racism' is just a term to allow you to feel good about disliking people you disagree with.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Yeah ok maybe you should look up the history of the quakers, who were the first to oppose slavery. But only because they wanted to eradicate black people from the entire country.
Sharecropping is the minimum, and was used to manipulate free/cheap labor from Black people and was a justification for white supremacists to beat and/or have black people arrested that didn't mean ridiculous quotas.
Look up the actual definition, guy. It's anything but your definition.
That's an argument of national origin, which is not an argument based on race. I'm not defending the argument, it's pathetic, but is not a race based argument
Correct, he was born on a military base, which is technically US land, but that didn't stop from saying "he is not eligible because he wasn't born in America".
It was so widely spread, fact checking groups had to address the issue.