Third World Skeptical Kid

Nice use of nazi propaganda tactics.

Exactly what lie am I repeating?

“a president that thinks” 🤥
🤪 sorry, couldn’t resist 😁

Fair point.

He specifically denounced neo-nazis at the same press conference you're referring too. Isn't there enough to complain about without complete misrepresentation? But, I know, CNN pushes that too.

We all saw the same speech. He denounced violent actors "on both sides" and didn't denounce neo Nazis in specific until he was pressured to several days later.

We remember what happened. Calling us Nazi revisionism doesn't work when you're altering the facts yourself.

Oh! He denounced violent actors on both sides? Good for him, try getting over it.

The woman who was killed wasn't killed by both sides. And no, we're not going to forget that.

Any blame for the antifa scum that smashed his car with a bat and aimed an ar -15 at him?

There are several photos, videos, and dozens of witnesses to what happened. You're talking rubbish.

Footage of the professor admitting he pointed a gun at Fields. Footage of someone hitting the back of his car with a bat. I wouldn't have stuck aroung either to be pulled out and beaten. I can 100 % guarantee that I looked into this closer than you. But keep believing the narrative and keep viewing everything in black and white terms.

Yes, his car never got hit, right
2y077m.gif (click to show)

Actually what happened was CNN - in its classic amazing dishonesty - ambushed him and edited what he said to make it sound like his reference to the non-neonazis was a reference to them instead.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/26/pollak-cnns-chris-cuomo-uses-deceptive-edit-to-boost-charlottesville-hoax/

But why let the facts get in the way of a good story, right?

I'm not reading that. I didn't watch what happened on CNN: I watched every word he said unedited and it was not what a President says after a tragedy. It may as well have been what one of my 13 year old students say when I catch them doing something wrong and they're trying to make excuses for themselves.

Stop trying to change what we remember. I remember it well. It wasn't that long ago.

"I'm not reading that. "

Total intellectual fail. ALWAYS question. The expression is, "Don't believe everything you think."

"Stop trying to change what we remember."

I guess you don't know how easy it is to manufacture "memories." Just like people "remember" that "reliable sources" "proved" Trump "colluded" with the russkies. Or it was bunk. One of the two anyway.

Since you have to be spoon-fed then, see if you can handle one short clip:

Cuomo added, referring to Trump’s Charlottesville comments: “I’d like to believe that the President of the United States just had an off moment, or said it wrong, he doesn’t mean it. But the facts slap that fiction in the face.”
On the contrary: the facts show that Cuomo was lying to his audience, using a deceptive edit of Trump’s comments.
When the president used the phrase “very fine people,” he was referring to protesters who were not neo-Nazis, but who had simply come to Charlottesville to protest the removal of a statue honoring the Confederate general Robert E. Lee. The fact that such protesters were there was confirmed by the New York Times, which reported afterwards:
| ”Good people can go to Charlottesville,” said Michelle Piercy, a night shift worker at a Wichita, Kan., retirement home, who drove all night with a conservative group that opposed the planned removal of a statue of the Confederate general Robert E. Lee.
| After listening to Mr. Trump on Tuesday, she said it was as if he had channeled her and her friends — all gun-loving defenders of free speech, she said, who had no interest in standing with Nazis or white supremacists: ”It’s almost like he talked to one of our people.”

Your falsity is punctured.

Have another balloon to poke with your party hack propaganda, from an underground embarrassment like Brietbart, no less.

Exactly.

Ad hominem, inter alia. You fail.

Appeal to Authority.
Suck on that, fanboi.

"Suck on that, fanboi"? Seriously?

And more importantly, ATA? I never made one.

Says it all.

Course you made no ATA because when you're off your meds, reality becomes fluid.

No it's not. Even by your account of the story, when the President was reached for a comment about a tragedy that the whole nation was mourning, he waffled.

He didn't waffle. He denounced the neonazis but said other good people were getting wrongly conflated with them.

You're not getting it, because you're not honest enough to let go of a politically useful narrative even if it's provably untrue. So there's be clearly no further point.

Are you so truly clueless that you STILL don't grasp the whole original point - that the good people were those NOT in the crowd?

And that CNN - in its classic dishonesty - twisted it to imply the opposite?

Guess you don't get to pass this year either :::-/

Scratch what you've seen with your own eyes, some online rag has a splendid surprise.

Andrew was sharp witted, funny as heck. Saw him on Fox's Red Eye many a time. True joy to see he has a fanbase loyal enough to be as brain-dead as he is in the grave.

Right, because dismissing it like others dismiss Huffpo isn't a bullshit ad hom evasion :::-/

And if the site quotes the NYT, that makes it even less true :::-/

You not only can't discuss it intelligently, you can't even spell it correctly. But hey, you posted, so that must mean you rebutted the logic somehow :::-/

Oooh, lemme play lying psuedo intellectual accusation time and claim you're citing something you're not!

My turn: Infowars sux, bruh!

Now your turn:

Pseudo, not psuedo. You really are out of your depth.

You didn't answer a single valid point. Settles that. Done here.

Drats, got me on the typo. Guess that meenz yore bullsheeet iz korwrecked then, eh?

The actual footage still trumps (see what I did there?) BrEitfart's dead right nut.

*Cites Breitbart*
Because of course you would.