I think they just want to kill off our species.

I see. Then we can grind up all the baby parts and eat them during satanic rituals.

I don't see where the line can be drawn. Yes, the planet would probably be better off without humans, but I don't personally think that everyone should commit mass suicide to give animals a better place to live. If it is ok to terminate a fetus exhibiting signs of life, then why shouldn't it be ok to kill a developed baby or even an infant or even a todder or anyone that could be seen as a burden. I am against people having the choice to kill other people.

Just because you can't see where the line is drawn, does not mean there isn't a line drawn. There is a line. If a baby is born and can live outside the womb, it would be illegal to kill it.

Of course, in the 50's-60's, both Dems and Republicans allowed downs syndrome babies to starve to death. Things are not out of control or worse than the past. Things get better every day.

Something like 1% of all abortions are late term. Almost all of those are due to a mother with major health problems or a fetus that is non-viable outside the womb. People are blowing things all out of proportion.

I don't see why it is technically legal in some jurisdictions to abort a fetus a month before birth but not a month after birth

That's in your mind, not the world. With that mentality, maybe it should be illegal to orgasm outside of a woman's va**na. Because you would literally be killing off potential children.

yes, potential children, but not a developed fetus with fingers and toes and a heart beat and brainwaves etc.

How do we decide ethically the limit? You say it's at fingers and toes? Who says your version is correct? It seems that it is mainly men who want to control this issue. It would be super easy to control it by just making it illegal to ejaculate outside of a woman's body and men could take full control of this issue. We could have jerk-off courts established throughout the country and be done with this issue once and for all.

no I don't think the limit is at fingers and toes, I think the limit is at being a human. Sperm is not a sentient being-- a developed child is. I don't see that men want to control the issue but even if men did, that doesn't change the fact that terminating sentient living things is bad, in my opinion. So to answer your question, we ethically decide the limit by deciding if a fetus is a human, and if human life is worth being inconvenienced over. thanks for the discussion

It appears many of them, atheist Leftists, have Earth/Gaia inserted into the God-slot in their brain, worshiping and valuing the Earth more than the human spirit. Their "meaning of life" is distorted.

Infanticide is illegal and always has been illegal.

"If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion," I believe this is an exact quote from Mr. Northam, the Governor of Virginia saying that a child could be delivered and even resuscitated, then made comfortable to die

The left hates babies. And they really want us to know about it hahah

Dimowits LOVE kids

Dude... Is that an alt above you...?

Huh