Peter Griffin News

i see shit

The issue is more that his church has a sending people to electroshock therapy problem

Citation needed...

Hollywood does for sure, Corey Feldman, Elijah Wood, and several others attest to that. Not to mention the Film "Call Me by Your Name" which is about a gay man seducing an under aged sexually confused teenage boy. Not to mention promotion and sexualization of the trans kids "Desmond is Amazing" and Lactatia.

Citations provided...

The over representation. A stat i've seen is 40% of sexual assault on kids are by homosexuals. Alot considering they only comprise 2-10% of the population.

1-2%

That number may not be so far off base...

https://www.hrc.org/resources/sexual-assault-and-the-lgbt-community

It said 40% of bi women experience rape between age 11 - 17. It did not say what gender they perpetrator was. Are you assuming the gender of the perpetrators?...

This is anecdotal, but most homosexuals I have met were usually molested by someone of the same sex when they were a child. confusing and scaring them for life.

The Blue Lagoon, Pretty Baby, and Endless Love are just three movie with Brooke Shields in it that are pedophilic. Pretty Baby was filmed in 1978 when Shields was just 13 years old and throughout the movie she's naked and is about a photographer (an adult male) who becomes obsessed with her.

The Blue Lagoon was filmed in 1980 when Shields was 15 years old and shows her having sex (not pornographic) with her male co-star who was 19 years old. And both are nude or semi-nude throughout the entire movie.

Endless Love was also filmed while Shields was underage and depicts her in sexual acts.

Let's also not forget about the riveting movie "Lolita." It stars Dominique Swain who was 18 at the time the film was released, but was depicted as a 12 year old girl who has a sexual relationship with a grown man in his 40's.

There are many more examples of movies that Hollywood deems appropriate. After all, "it's just acting and fantasy."

1.) Even if you believe the movie was not about pedophilia, it is. Its is about a medical student (so aged probably around 22 - 25 possibly even older) engaging in a relationship with a 17 year old boy.

2.) It depends. Do you believe that LGBT community makes up any and all gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and trans people, or only the ones who claim they are in the community? Because if it is anyone who is just gay or bi, Terry Crews' assailant is technically in the LGBT community. And that would also add almost all of the child serial killers as well.
And people who claim to be in the community who are known child assaulters are Asia Argento and Kevin Spacey.

And not to forget (not pedophilia) the huge assault problem in the WNBA. With senior players forcing the rookies to be their girlfriends and/or preform sexual acts on them...

If you would consider that the same if the med student was a 30 year man, and the 17 year old was a girl. I will accept that, but it is a slippery slope...

Most mass child kidnap/murders raped and sexually assaulted their victims before they killed them.

https://www.ranker.com/list/famous-serial-killers-of-children/ranker-crime

If that is what you believe, but it is a slippery slop. I don't think a 17 year is mature enough to engage in that type of behavior, and a 30 year old should know better.

Did you read the all the articles? Most were child rapist, several assaulted those of the same sex...

Because there's hetero, then there's etc.

For one thing, he said "Hollywood AND the LGBTQ community".

For another, there are some who are trying to normalize pedophilia and get it added to the sjw alphabet. They've even come up with a new term for themselves as a PR move. They've started calling themselves "MAPs", which is an acronym for "Minor Attracted Persons".

On top of that, just look at the over-sexualization of "Queen Lactatia" as an example.

As another example, look at the way laws are being put in place to allow pre-pubescent children to say they are transgender. Hell, here in Canada, your child can be taken away from you if you /don't/ allow them to be transgender.

As I've said before, that's a dangerously slippery slope, because if a 5 year old child can be considered mentally developed enough to decide they're the wrong sex, it won't be long before some are claiming that a 5 year old can be considered mentally developed enough to HAVE sex.

You're ageist... If marriage can get an imaginary redefining from the correct "one adult male human + one adult female human" by changing one of the variables, then who are you to be so bigoted to not all the number, age, or species to likewise be changed?

Odd liberals call “logical” fallacious. Truth is truth. Learn it.

Defend then why one variable can be changed and the others cannot, bigot.

I do. Like artificially changing the genders in the marriage equation. Yet you’ve still not answered the question. Why do YOU get to bigotly decide gender variable can change, but species, quantity, and age variables cannot?

There was an interesting docu on Sammy Davis Jr I watched on PBS last night.
Catch it for your answer and also to learn what REAL bigotry is like when it comes from those like YOU regressives.

Humans, so much cranial space wasted on storing bullshit.

Corey Feldman is still protecting his pedophile pal Michael Jackson's rep even after the other Corey died, so he can go f**k himself.

And don't forget to add a "W" to that LGBTQ, because practically the entire Me Too Movement has issue with abusive hetero males, or do you find so-called "rape culture" an actual cultural phenomenom and an acceptable one at that?

You know who called out Hollywood long ago and who was Black Balled for it? Courtney Love..She was the first to have the balls to report Weinstein and they snubbed her for it. She may have her troubles and faults but she really stuck to her guns on the BS there b4 it was "Chic"
Her performance in "Larry Flint" was great (all though not too far of a stretch from parts of her life at 1 time) But still the best performance that year (in my opinion) and the academy screwed her.

Interesting note, she may have acting royalty in her blood. Marlon Brando may be Courtney's Grandfather . Very interesting story, look it up.

I will do that.

I forgot about that, my distaste for her tending to make me avoid hearing about her.
I never saw the movie either, elavating Flint into a hero seemed odd, plus it seemed like a rather unpleasant and depressing atmosphere in general, so....

But yeah, turned out she was ages ahead on that one, now that Sudden Simultaneous Amnesia Alleviation Syndrome (SSAAS. I have to come up with a new one) is all the rage.

So she coulda been somebody? (some shoot me, please) I'll have to check that out.

great "on the waterfront" joke, no need to shoot. The Movie is depressing but excellent and her work there was stellar. My 5 days a week Catholic church Mother even liked it.
Yea, kinda hard to be a fan of hers other than the "Live through this album" which was good(But Kurt wrote all the songs) whom she may have killed (says her dad) but who knows.

Yeah, but it was corny.

If they show on tv again, I'll give it a go.

"Kill Kurt For This"? I'll pass on that.
It wasn't just her ready-for-puke-time-television hijincks, there was always this "Look at me" air about it all.

there were a few good docu's on Kurts death, they made a few good points.

I remember seeing about how arm length, angle of the shotgun, etc, didn't add up, as well as her motive. But then I read some other stuff that blew that all off. I just think it odd that BOOM! he's gone and she suddenly comes up with HIS next album....

couple this were odd PI said, gun in wrong hand,enough heroin there to kill 10 horses(why not use that?) Some nazis said she hired him to kill him, he backed out, they interviewed him , next day he was found dead, run over by a train..was thought provoking

Interesting. On one hand, how could she get away with it, on the other, if she was poor, she'd be in prison for it.

Well that is the reason for the movie, I take it. And although I'm not familiar with the particulars, I have feeling his fight was more about his exploitation business rather than the good fight for voices unheard.

Not saying I don't look at nudes, just saying what he's about.

Oops, I said the "n" word, "n*de."

Hopefully a certain devout momma's boy virgin Christianator doesn't see it and get triggered.
Last thing I would hate is for him to do like God says and gouge his burning eyes out because then he can't call the FBI to lock me up for talking about naughty bits.

I don't know much about the Michael Jackson accusations. But I do know that a couple of the Jackson accusers fled the country after the hearings, not to mention the conflicting testimonies. So I'm not going to get into that particular case. But Feldman, Wood, and several other child actors have come forward about Hollywood's pedophilia problem.

Women make up about 51% of the U.S. population, that means men make up 49% and homosexuals make around 5% of that. The sexual assault statistics are 17% while I agree rape and sexual assault is terrible and wish it never happened, there does not seem to be massive sexual assault problem in the U.S. in the grand scheme of things. But I do wonder what percentage of the statistic is from the LGBTQ community?...

https://www.hrc.org/resources/sexual-assault-and-the-lgbt-community

Also here is an easy way to tell if a sexual assault accusation or hate crime is real or not. If the accusers just disappear after the trial or take a settlement/hush money the accusation if probably fake.
If they don't make a public event out of it, ergo not about the money or fame it is more than likely real.

Correct, you don't know much, including the names of these people you alleged fled. Fled from what, MJ climbing in their window for revenge?

17% of what? If you mean in terms of perps or victims out of total pop, that there is a way high number. Oh, and a bogus one. Look up definition of "sexual assault" vs "rape" and how a broad interpretation of the former is misconstrued to inflate the number of the latter.
And even if it was just 1%, that would still be a MASSIVE problem to anyone who was sexually assaulted and those around them and society in general. Your callous take on that is chilling.

I have no idea what your stats are supposed to add up to. And I don't do links.

"Also here is an easy way to tell if a sexual assault accusation or hate crime is real or not. If the accusers just disappear after the trial or take a settlement/hush money the accusation if probably fake.
If they don't make a public event out of it, ergo not about the money or fame it is more than likely real."

That is so utterly ridiculous, I keep rereading it looking for a punchline.
Accusers disappear for a host of reasons, ranging from getting killed (as with the Mafia, Russians, etc), having to go in to hiding for their own protection, a desire for anonymity, to the simple fact that once it's over, it's over, and the media isn't coming over everyday anymore to discuss the weather over a cup of tea and crumpets.

Anyone who offers settlement/hush money to hush or settle a sexual assault accusation or hate crime is offering a settlement/hush money to hush or settle a sexual assault accusation or hate crime. There is no reason for the accused to do resort to buying someone's silence if the accused is innocent.
Michael Jackson paid a kid $23 million and it was NOT to not talk about his innocence.

There were about 3 Kurt docu's, Think the one was called "Soaked in bleach" all 3 were very interesting.

You mean Evan Chandler, and your saying, MJ was gonna be climbing in yo windows snatching yo kids up, raping everybody. Highly unlikely...

I would say that it was out of population. Rape is bad, I had said that in the previous commit. I'm trying to put things in perspective in a short amount of time and spaces. Do not mistake a shortened argument thread as callous attitude you freaking tool...

The link was to a HRC (human rights campaign) website, so not exactly a right wing source. But classic liberal, ignoring facts they don't like.

Actually it is not ridiculous. Your idea of my idea of disappear is ridiculous. I meant after the case is through and the accused is found innocent, like Trump, Brett Kavanaugh, the Duke lacrosse team, etc... Of course a person was killed by the mob or something like that would more likely confirm everyone suspicion of the accused. Duh... And you are correct once the trial is over, yes the media is not in your face constantly. Unless your Stormy Daniels...

And wrong again, if a person is truly wronged I do not believe being bought off would be on their mind. Getting the truth about the monster should be the primary goal. But maybe that's just me... A settlement is both parties saying hey I don't feel like dragging this out and wasting more time and money, how about we call this off. Which says more about the accuser than the accused to me. Them going for money over ethics mentality...

tl;dr

Hey, moron, I already pointed out how YOU were being callous, so spare me your deperate "no you"isms.

Sexual abuse is sexual abuse, regardless of how you think your like of "Thriller" on MTV back in the day permits you to give MJ a pass. I understand that that you're a fan of that sick pedophile, MJ, so hence your adamant defense of him and asisnine assertion that him buying the silence of a victim is "proof" that the charges were fake, but that doesn't alter the reality that he paid someone millions of dollars to not talk about what MJ did to him, PERIOD.

To dismiss rape as "well it's only 17%, so not a massive problem" is a rather disturbing assestment. What you've saif throughout this meme thread is totally devoid of any notion that the victims are people. Your lack of empathy - reducing them to just stats retrofitted to suit a specific agenda - is disturbing, and missing your own point.
You wing fake numbers (40%?), not noticing that you failed to address the other 60%. News flash: 100% of adult abuse of children is committed by ADULTS. Pointing fingers at a subset - regardless of your artificially inflated numbers - while ignoring the the rest, including the MAJORITY of the crimes, is a reflection of you and your mentality, and that's disturbing.

Are you an alt of Grind? Or is "it's only bad when the they do it" just typical of this site?

This convo is over.

tl,dr?

Your's was the same length. lol

tsh;dr

You are clearly hysterical and in no right mind to talk rationally about this issue. I am sorry if you were ever assaulted in your life. But you are imaging a world were people don't rape or commit crime ever. We unfortunately do not live in that world, maybe we can in the next. But here in our world, (the real one) crime is going to happen.

Do I wish it would not? Yes absolutely, but that is not how the world works.

I want all rapist and other criminals locked up or killed.

Not a fan of Michael Jackson, thriller is alright. But any grown @$$ man that invites children over to his house to hangout is not right in the head.
But that does bring up an interesting topic, if a neo-nazis made a cure for cancer. Does he get to keep the credit for curing cancer?
So question being, Michael Jackson is a possible pedo. Does listening to his music you a bad person?

Your next bit is just a bunch of words salad. The meme was about Hollywood and LGBTQ community having a rape and pedo problem. Which they both do...
You are the one who brought up the topic of the #Me Too movement. Which seemed to primary involve celebrities, Hollywood producers, etc... Only proving the point of the meme.

Also News Flash Lena Dunham admitted when she was little girl, that she assaulted her younger sister as a child. So you are Fake News...

I don't know what Alt of Grind is, I just make funny political memes.

tl;dr

The convo was ended? And If I am hysterical (was it those dreaded caps lock?), then why are you wasting my time?

Go listen to your fave pedo, MJ. Because according to you, you being a fan makes him innocent.

Hypocritical asswipe, totally oblivious to what YOUR OP meme says.

said*

You're the one who said convo over...