I am not saying she is lying.

I am not saying she is lying. | SO CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD ACCUSED BRET KAVANAUGH OF SOMETHING THAT SUPPOSEDLY HAPPENED 34 YEARS AGO WHEN THEY WERE TEENAGERS. BUT THAT IS NON | image tagged in memes,but thats none of my business,kermit the frog | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
5,256 views, 37 upvotes, Made by capt6550 2 months ago memesbut thats none of my businesskermit the frog
But Thats None Of My Business memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Can you say "poisoning the well"?

Does this mean every time a conservative woman says she was sexually assaulted I get to claim she's lying or has some ulterior motive?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
If there is doubt and there are no facts, then yes you can. Just because someone claims something happened, that does not make it so. There still has to be evidence presented.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Like all those men that claim they were sexually abused by priests?

Let's just sweep that under the rug. GREAT NEWS FOR PRIESTS!! OR ANY PEDOPHILES!!! YAY!
reply
1 up, 2 replies
When you have multiple accusers, as is the case with the priests, that tends to lend more credence to the claims. When you have only one person making the claim and multiple people saying that it is TOTALLY out of character. Then you need to question the claim a little more. Especially when the accuser is strongly ideologically opposed to the person being accused.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You know there are serial killers whose family had no idea and would say that brutally killing people was "TOTALLY out of character" for them, right?
reply
1 up
Ted bundy | WELP....HE'S GOTTA POINT THERE | image tagged in ted bundy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I'd be strongly opposed to the person that assaulted me too. But hey that's me.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I said she opposed him ideologically, I don't know if she opposes him personally. I am just saying her motive may not but justice, but to just stop a constitutional originalist from getting on the Supreme Court. Until we see some evidence, at this point she is less believable than he is.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
A "constitutional originalist" that believes the president can't be indicted?
The founders are rolling over in their graves.
reply
0 ups
They've been "rolling over in their graves" since about 1913.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
The mission was to destroy Kavanaugh. Mission accomplished. Who cares if it's truthful or not?
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
reply
0 ups
NPC Level: No brain activity
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Trump grabs pussies. Big deal. His political views don't make him a better person or worse person. He's a scumbag regardless....even when he was a democrat.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Allegedly grabs ... unlike Slick Willy Clintoon who got his knob polished in the Oval Office and then shoved a cigar into Monica.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
so what? LOL consensual and he's not president so who cares? Stop playing WHATABOUT and focus on now and here.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Juanita Broderick disagrees. So does Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones. There's a pattern that you ignored when your guy was in the limelight and his "wife" was running.

For Brett Kavanaugh, there is zero evidence, a story that's changed over the years, no mention of his name until it became important, no witnesses except ones that explicitly say he WAS NOT there that night, and the ever important threat of lying to Congress in her letter and potential testimony.

Face it. This was a Democratic hit job. You know it. I know it. Everyone else knows it. She's a calculating liar and a self professed member of "the Trump resistance." Plain and simple.

How's that for focus?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
She could very well be telling the truth. Timing is suspect for goal of coming to light now buy still....she may be 100% accurate in her account and him being a complete creepo assaulter. You can b**ch about WHEN or WHY she is coming forward now....but that doesn't negate the validity of WHAT she is saying or it's truth.

Just because it's inconvenient for some....doesn't mean she is lying.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
100% chance she's lying. You're completely deluded if you think otherwise. Her story never mentioned him. People at that party are willing to testify that Kavanaugh wasn't even there. This is a hit job. It never happened. This is a calculated operation designed to do one thing ... delay this vote in hopes that the Dims take the Senate and can veto his appointees. It's as plain as the nose on your face.

Another Democrat hit job. That's all this is. And you know it. Your little fake protestations are amusing.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I don't know it. Neither do you. I am not willing to say anything 100%. Maybe she is lying. Maybe she isn't. I can't be sure. No one can. Why is it certain she is lying and impossible to think HE is?

"People at that party are willing to testify that Kavanaugh wasn't even there. "
WHO? His friends?

I know someone that went through this pretty much exact situation almost 30 years ago. She never came forward out of embarrassment and fear. The "jocks" involved would certainly lie to this day to protect each other if she were to ever bring it public.

I have ZERO reason to think 100% he is innocent. Not because I hate the guy, but because I know women are many times belittled and not believed.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
And I know someone who had their life ruined because of a fake **pe allegation. He dated her but never had sex with her. He was up for a commission to West Point but after he broke up with her, she saw her chance to ruin his life and made the allegations. After West Point said "We'll pass" she recanted.

It cuts both ways but it's a little too convenient and 100% democrat predictable in this case. YOU can't say 100% but I do. One Hundred Percent. Even the FBI says this is not a criminal issue but a political issue.

It’s a totally unprovable allegation. The parties involved have differing accounts. Mark Judge, another man mentioned in the account, denies this alleged attack ever occurring. Oh, and I forgot to mention that DiFi knew about this back in the summer, but held onto it for weeks, keeping all of her Senate colleagues in the dark. That alone speaks to how her office viewed this allegation and its credibility. Even now DiFi says it may or may not be true.

It’s a politically motivated character assassination because Democrats don’t have the votes to block Kavanaugh outright.

So, use this allegation, which was dredged up during Ford’s 2012 couple’s therapy session—and even the notes offer a different account and don’t name Kavanaugh — to create chaos and delay. Delaying until after the midterms increases Democrats’ chances to derail the nomination, especially if this unverifiable accusation further fanes the anti-Trump flames spreading throughout the party’s liberal base.

Remember when the original story was that Ford never told anyone until 2012? Yeah—that’s a lie. Also, witnesses named by Ford deny being at the party or even knowing about it. This is collapsing fast, proof it's a lie.

Someone claiming to be a high school friend of Ford's published, then deleted, a tweet and Facebook post claiming she was aware of the attempted assault shortly afterward. The problem with that fleeting assertion, or any similar unverifiable Democrat assertions, is that Ford herself is on the record as saying that she didn't tell anyone about it for 30 years.

If we are to believe Ford's memory -- which is the whole basis of this entire case -- anyone now claiming knowledge of the incident must be viewed with skepticism. They're contradicting her. Or she's misremembering a crucial details (convenient). And now the woman says she has no firsthand knowledge of the alleged incident.

LOL -- and you still believe her? Bwahahaha!
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Let’s recap here, Democrats were willing to use this woman, potentially dragging her through hell to stop Kavanaugh. You leak the story, force her out of the shadows, which she intended on doing anyway, only to push nonsensical talking points, disregard the statute of limitations, and hope that enough pressure comes to bear to stop this nominee. Well, they failed. The Left didn’t take into account that almost everyone thinks the timing of this disclosure is suspect, coupled with the fact that this allegation cannot be adequately vetted to discern what is truth or crap. And frankly, that's the point. Maybe there's a reason why Feinstein’s office sat on this letter. It wouldn't have gone anywhere.

It created a lot of noise, but after the decibels return to normal levels, the chess pieces are the same: the GOP isn’t buckling, at least not on this weak sauce allegation and they'll have the votes to confirm. This isn't the first trip up. The Left blew it when they demanded more time for document disclosures after they had signaled they would never support Kavanaugh in any way. So, why would Grassley entertain their BS motions during the hearing?

The same transparent nonsense is here: the Democrats want to delay with this appallingly shoddy allegation, the GOP sees it, and even the most anti-Trump of Republicans aren’t going to break ranks. It seems another bomb has exploded in the Democrats’ faces. It's delicious actually.

We’ll know on Monday if the GOP has the balls to tell the Democrats and their hit job attempt to go pound sand.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
if she is lying why is she the one asking for a thorough investigation?
0 ups
Theater.
The FBI doesn’t investigate this kind of crap. She knows it.

This is just a hit job.
Flip Settings
But Thats None Of My Business memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
SO CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD ACCUSED BRET KAVANAUGH OF SOMETHING THAT SUPPOSEDLY HAPPENED 34 YEARS AGO WHEN THEY WERE TEENAGERS. SHE IS A LIBERAL CALIFORNIA COLLEGE PROFESSOR WHO IS A LIFE-LONG DEMOCRAT AND HAS PROCLAIMED THAT SHE IS PART OF THE TRUMP RESISTANCE. SHE'S DONATED TO BERNIE SANDERS AND THE DNC. SHE SIGNED A LETTER CONDEMNING ARRESTING ILLEGAL ALIENS. SHE SAYS SHE HAS NO ULTERIOR MOTIVE. BUT THAT IS NONE OF MY BUSINESS.
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback