I said it was censorship, whether it is the company's right to make the decision or not. If I owned a book store (and I actually did at one time) and refused to sell a book because I don't like the content, I have the perfectly legal right not to make it available in my shop. But this doesn't make my action any less an act of censorship. And the point some people are rightfully concerned with is this: when a bunch of censor-happy people band together to suppress ideas which they find offensive, then we open the door to regimes of censorship. Think of Hitler and his brown shirt cohorts burning books across Germany, communist China confiscating books by Western authors (and imprisoning those who owned them), and even American college universities back in the 1950's that assumed young people couldn't be exposed to certain ideas. Think about all the self-righteous people throughout history who have banned, censored, destroyed and penalized literature, art, music and the basic exchange of ideas. Some of us do not want protective measures making our choices for us, because we know what such runaway dictates made in the names of morality and the common good have led to in the past.