If Regressives really cared about kids, they'd build the wall. And get rid of Planned Parenthood, but that's another meme ...

If Regressives really cared about kids, they'd build the wall.  And get rid of Planned Parenthood, but that's another meme ... | KIDS ARE BEING SEPARATED FROM THEIR PARENTS WHEN THEIR PARENTS DRAG THEM THOUSANDS OF MILES ACROSS A DESERT THEN INDUCE THEM TO COMMIT A CRI | image tagged in memes,deadpool surprised,kids separated at border,libtards,regressive left | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Deadpool Surprised memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
14 ups, 1 reply
Roll Safe Think About It Meme | IT’S A CRIME TO WANT A BETTER LIFE FOR YOUR KIDS | image tagged in memes,roll safe think about it | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
Nope but it's a crime to sneak illegally into a country to which you hold no citizenship.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
At least they are doing it peacefully compared to our European ancestors.
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
MOST OF YOUR ANCESTORS WERE ALSO JUST PEACEFUL THE PROBLEM WERE THE ONES THRIVING OF CONFLICT. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
doesn’t alter the fact of today. And these migrants being peaceful.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"most of them"
never all of them
That´s just not possible.
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Well when you provide me video evidence of illegals walking up to points of entry or out in the desert with weaponry, armored vehicles etc and engaging our military and border patrol in fire fights? I'll stick with my statement..lol
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
interesting how specific your requirements are.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Yes they are specific. because more often than not things like this are not just black and white..Take Trumps comments on the Separating parents.. HE clearly lied and thats Black and White..Regarding the flow of illegals? cause and effect will vary..
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
The problems with illegals is not black and white.

Human and child traficing is a problem.
Most problems with illegals are not at the border.
Drugs. Thievery. Murder.

I like open borders but I can not turn a blind eye on the negatives. If we/they can stop the problematic illegals. Then the puplic eye on the illegals inside the borders gets better.
BUT the best thing would be if there were only legal immigrants. Illegal immigrants are forced by their illegal status to work hidden from the law. That causes more trouble.
1 up
I think I just said that it’s not a black n White issue regarding immigration. As for the minor issue of criminal illegal immigrants? Putting aside drugs because they are only supplying the demand of American drug users who come in all ages and races. Up to the wealthy. Murder? Drug cartels, runners, on the dealer on the street? They don’t force anyone to by the product. As for OIS? They happen due to corrupt and unconstitutional laws that create criminals. Ponder it. Government creates a problem where it did not exist then needs your taxes to fix it. The drug war was lost before it began only wasting billions and tossing away good lives of LE and others. The odds of you being killed by a stranger are slim to none. Yes there are sex traffickers so dehumanize all immigrants and their children? Never voted so being a libturd is off the table. Lol
reply
2 ups
It's not even like sneaking, some of the tunnels are over 100 years old
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
So I guess you're going to be quiet now? Or do you only believe news from MS13NBC? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/border-patrol-agent-shooting-update-today-2018-06-13/
reply
2 ups
No not really..You are comparing apples to oranges. A drug runner is not attempting to enter to actually live here and find a better life. A drug runner is doing so to supply the demand of American drug habits..Maybe something got lost in translation. a singular shooting is unfortunate but a fire fight does make. Even the drug runner does not actual thrive on conflict. criminals and so called "criminals" tend to try and avoid contact with LE..My statement clearly said crossing and purposely engaging government agents..PURPOSELY But since the text of my post doesn't fit your agenda you discard the things that don't support or defeat your views...BTW? Ive never voted democrat and i say that because so many on the right seem to think every right winger should hold the exact same opinion. if not? they are a libtard..lolol
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
https://i.imgflip.com/2dcn88.jpg
reply
0 ups
Um, wOt?
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
i.imgflip.com/2cnzpx.jpg (click to show)
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
It's also about changing the voter base. Remember, if you can't change the voter's mind, just change the voter.
reply
3 ups
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Could you provide a actual valid source to the contents of such a bill? That demands sex traffickers and drug runners can't be arrested I WOULD LOVE TO READ THAT
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
"...actual valid source to the contents of such a bill..."
This usually means, "I'm going to judge what the source you supply says about the contents of the bill based on my political/moral biases, if I even read what that source has to say."

It is called the Keep Families Together Act. Every Democrat has co-sponsored it, no Republicans have.

If I give you centrist/moderate or right of center news sources who will point out the negative aspects and consequences of the bill, depending on your political biases you my say something like, "Those are right wing sources, how can I trust that!?"

If you are so inclined, you can do the intellectually honest thing and take the name of the bill and find various sources to explain the contents of the bill.

I would suggest reading multiple sources and not being like the average person on the internet and staying in a political/social/moral bubble and comfort zone and only listening to or reading sources that only talk about either the beneficial or negative consequences of proposed legislation.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Not even a good effort at a logical fallacy.
reply
2 ups
I'm not sure you even know how to articulate when someone uses a logical fallacy.
If it is "not...a logical fallacy" that means it is logical.

Since I never told you to disprove my statement I did not commit a "burden of proof fallacy."

Me telling you the name of the bill and suggesting that you find your own sources concerning the contents goes right along with your requests of "...actual valid sources..." Instead of my giving you the sources that talk about criminal illegal aliens not being detained and investigated properly, I suggested you go and find them yourself. That is perfectly logical.

BUT everyone reading this knows you are not going to go do that...

If you want here is the entire text of the bill, enjoy. (You are not going to read this either...)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/3036/text
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2cq623.jpg (click to show)
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
All I see is irony when you post that
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
you're a f**kin bot! BOOO
reply
0 ups
Everyone knows about you, we're just having a bit of fun! Look, if you comrades actually ran off all us talented memers, you'd be out of a job!
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
Gotta love those democrats !
reply
2 ups
Without the will of our more progressive/liberal ancestors pushing for human progress against the tides of religious caliphates such as Christianity, Islam, and judaism etc. There would be NO scientific method. Funny thing though? Today? Christians and other religions LOVE all the creature comforts and weapons the scientific method has created "until" it's applied to the existence of their false deities..lol then it becomes hogwash..
reply
0 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
We should torture kids and take them away from their parents because their parents crossed an imaginary line.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Nobody tortures them.
Borders are real.
Don't believe me? Walk into Russia unannounced and start speaking English.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Russia believes in imaginary lines too, in which case. Just as ridiculous as certain Americans.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Dam dude...
How's the weather in Neverland?
Name a country with no border.

Seriously though. Humans have been drawing lines in the sand since before written history. I think it's been established that borders are a real thing and not to be crossed without permission or consequences.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Naming a country with no border is about the same as naming all countries with imaginary lines, if not entirely the same.

Yes, but the humans in ancient history's lines were real. Possibly the one only real border existing today is the Great Wall of China, and it's not even a line; it's a wall. There are possible mountain/river borders between nations, but not here in the US.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Bro, your going to tear your arm off if you keep reaching like that.

Are you suggesting that to even have a border to defend we must build a wall otherwise the border is undefined?

Here in Texas we have the Rio Grande that every illegal immigrant must cross over to enter the country from Mexico.

At some point in human history, man gained the mental faculties to create borders without the need for physical boundaries. Today we use latitudes and longitudes. I suppose we could throw away our mental evolution and go back to actual lines in the sand but don't you think that's a little regressive?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"Here in Texas we have the Rio Grande that every illegal immigrant must cross over to enter the country from Mexico"

No we don't. As it happens, most illegal immigrants take an airplanes across the borders. As a result, the Rio Grande suddenly becomes less of an obstacle unless the airplane happens to land in it to rescue the passengers.

And no, I suggest we don't have borders. I suggest we don't have nations.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Dam the dems are good at manipulating people. The new magic words of the week are "overstayers" and "illegals entrants". No illegal entrants arrive by plane, unless they're in a suitcase.

This is getting ridiculous.

We do have borders, we do have nations. You're mentally challenged if you don't think so. I don't really even know how to reply to that.

I'm beginning to think the new left tactic is to just say super retarded things to baffle people with intelligence. In fairness, it's working.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Good thing I'm not a Democrat. I'm more of a moderate if anything.

I think we do have nations. I just don't think we should have them.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
You're too far out. That kind of thinking is about 1000 years too early.
1 up
I thought the old days were better.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Any family that crosses thousands of miles of desert to come here I'll personally encore for citizenship. I mean which desert and why cross it? Anyways, keep the faith on the wall... Murica!
reply
1 up
Guatemala is 2000+ miles from California. Central Mexican Matorral, Sonora Desert, Chihuahua Desert, Baja Desert, Yuma Desert, etc.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
I love how some people still think a wall would do anything other than cost money.
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
The wall will slow the flow of illegal immigration and give the system a chance to process the detained illegal immigrants.

You're right, where there's a will there's a way. People will still get in. People with weaker wills will be dissuaded from entering. The very act of Trump getting elected decreased the flow of illegals. It's a mental thing. The wall will work exactly as it's supposed to. It is a dam to control the flow, not a barrier.

The reason illegal immigration is a "crisis" is because they are coming into the country faster than they can be processed in accordance with our laws. This means people get stuck in detention centers for a very long time and that is the real problem. Overly long "prison" times. If the load on the system was lower then the illegals could be processed in weeks instead of months or years. No more prison.

The money to build the wall would be well spent. It would provide jobs and contribute to the alleviation of the suffering of our currently detained illegal immigrants. Don't take a negative outlook without weighing the positive side.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You lie.

Show me your facts and I'll show you mine :)

I've got um lined up for you :D
Even the liberal media admits it!
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Don't let me stop you, go ahead.

- Oh, that's right, you didn't because you can't.

Nice to see you borrow the "lie" observation from me.

Sad.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
to save myself some time copy and paste this into google:

was there a decrease in illegal immigration when trump got elected
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
To save Google time for lying for you?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You may be right but spike in march isn't a trend and that isn't a very useful graph. It leaves out a big chunk of time. I was wondering why a graph like that would even be used anywhere but then I realized it must be because it's from the LATimes and they liked the way those months looked. Their BS is strong. I find it funny that you're doing exactly what they did and cherry picking your timeframe to support your argument.

My statement earlier was about how all it took was Trump getting elected for immigration to slow down. The unedited graph I posted supports my claim that there is a mental barrier as well as the physical ones. Just the thought of evil Trump waiting on the other side of the border was enough to keep some people from coming over. Imagine adding a wall to the equation.

I'm not always right, but I don't intentionally lie to mislead people. I'm neither wrong, nor am I lying in this case :)
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You lie too much.

PS: Again, didn't read your drivel past the 1st line.
reply
1 up
cool that graph is like mine but missing a year and with less information and clarity!
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
HA!

I Just did the math. In '17 the average Southern Border Crossings over those six months was over 32,000. In '18 the average Southern Border Crossings for those six months were only 29,000.

The LA times just posted a misleading picture and flat out lied about the increase. The optical illusion of the decrease in '17 fooled me too for a minute there. That's too funny!
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Why is it that stupid people lie so much? Oh, that's right, because they're stupid and they lie.

Note, the rise in rates continues, but you have to wait a couple before cute charts for those who can't read covering April, May, June... come out.
reply
2 ups
Oh I have no doubt it began to increase. Once again, the statement I made was that illegal immigration decreased due to the simple fact that Trump got elected because that affected the moral and psyche of potential illegal immigrants.

This graph, along with every other graph you've posted with the correct timeframe, also clearly supports my statement.

lol
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Save yourself some time, of course.

You lie too much.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Refer to my other comment. There may have been an increase in the past three months, but my statement holds true. The very act of Trump becoming president scared off potential immigrants. The graph covering 30 months as opposed to your six, and even three most recent months, speaks for itself. My statement is true. Perhaps the initial shock has died down and they're getting braver again. Please address your comments to my other response.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I'm done.

Thanks for playing have another beer pass out guy goodnight
reply
2 ups
Goodnight and thank you! It's been extra fun today. I had a good time hollering at brick walls on imgflip.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Give it up already. You've, I mean, VagabondSouffle has already posted enough graphs that support my claim. This graph is too broad and doesn't even show the useful timeframes clearly. It's not even relevant. Mexicans vs Non Mexicans? That's got nothing to do with anything I said.

You tease me for being "young" but at least my old public school reading and math comprehension skills are still intact!
reply
1 up, 2 replies
they all show immigration is at all time lows and not a problem, just another made up fake crises for the wall and gun nuts
reply
1 up
That they went from over one million p/yr when GW Bush was in office to less than half during Obama's tenure and continued the same trajectory till this year with Trump bypassed this illiterate bunghole Grind's comprehension skills . Plus he ran out of fingers to count on.
reply
0 ups
And they all show a clear and sudden decrease when Trump was elected. Exactly what I said in my original statement.

I'm not disputing the rises or decreases in other areas. I'm defending my claim that is, and at this point should clearly be, indisputable.
reply
0 ups
You even admitted that the numbers increased this year, as they continue to do.

Stop acting stupid, you're too good at it.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Because those on the right keep perpetuating the lie that separating a family is a "LAW" when it isn't..It's only a policy in how to enforce a law..
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Who's saying it's a law? I've never heard a single "right" say it's a law. The only time I hear about it being a law is when the left accuses the right of believing it's a law. It's ludicrous.

Every one who's paying attention to this immigration thing knows it's just a policy.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
WOW...Your blatant bs??? You need to run for public office..No need to reply lol you clearly will deny and bury yourself in cognitive biases and logical fallacies until it kills you..You are almost as bad as the gal who told me Abortion wasn't a problem until Obama got elected...
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Mind linking a little evidence to support your claim? No oblivious idiots off the sidewalk please. There's plenty of those to the left and the right.

I'm sure it's happened a few times but I'd say the vast majority already know and the ones that did say it have already learned otherwise. Like I said, I've never seen it said for myself but I do see liberal accusations all the time.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You've never seen it? never seen Trump claim it's a law they must separate kids?? Apparently you don't watch any news fox or otherwise,,
reply
0 ups
Ha! Nope! I get my current events from imgflip, fb, internet friends, and irl friends. If it's important, I'll hear about it.

I research the hot topics on my own. Whenever I do see news it's usually the liberal stuff apple pushes with their news app. I get very little right leaning news in my direction, believe it or not.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Just a observation...That wall is already built..lol
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
It's got gaps in the desert areas. The idea was nobody would be dumb enough to try and walk through the desert. After they started finding a lot of human raisins the border patrol started burying water bottles and marking them with flags and stuff so the illegals wouldn't die anymore.

They sacrificed the natural barrier to save lives. It's only fair that they should replace it with a man made barrier.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/border-trilogy-part-1

There's another two parts
reply
1 up, 1 reply
As interested as I am I don't think I can spend 3 hours listening! Mind giving me a rundown?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
download to your phone and listen in the car, on the bus...?
reply
0 ups
But music!
reply
1 up
Oh come on, if we can't pick on everyone it's prejudice.
reply
2 ups
reply
1 up, 2 replies
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Our education is shit... have you seen most of the memes here or the posts on Facebook? You should be fined for posting "can i get pegnint from anal?"
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Next time you get pulled over, be nice to the officer. You'd be surprised how they react to common human decency.

Or you can try running away from a vehicle linked to a drive by shooting with weapons inside and see how far you get.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Or? Maybe I and others would grant LE a little more respect if they refused to violate the constitution EVERY time they go on patrol. Maybe? i and those like me would have more respect for LE if they wouldn't whizz their pants so much and kill unarmed people because theres a difference between genuine self defense and over reacting and using a "I feared for my life" get out of jail free card. The privileges cops receive is for one reason..Incentive to be a cop..Where else can you yank on someones arm causing them to flinch and then slam to the ground scream stop resisting as you beat the shit out of them..If anyone becomes physical with you and yeah even a cop you are going to resist..It's human instinct to do so..They scream stop resisting as a trick to bystanders who testify in court..Well judge the cop told the guy to stop resisting..so he started punching him in the face? as though that would make him stop..RIGHT.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Most police officers are decent people. The stress of the job, hate from the masses, and special freedoms do bake some bad cookies though. It's really all in how the people they have to approach deal with them.

If you're cooperative, kind, and make the officer feel safe and appreciated you can expect a pleasant enough encounter even if you do get a fine. If you're going to be an asshole to someone who can legally smack you around, expect to get smacked around. Tough luck but I've seen plenty of "victims" that got what they had coming.

Treat each officer as an individual human being and there won't be trouble.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Thats true..We can all be decent "people" a decent "cop" is not the same thing. They are required by accepting the job to use force and deadly force to not just impose good and just laws. But also the bad and unconstitutional laws. If you can not read our constitution and grasp the laws that are blatantly unconstitutional? Thats on you..Point is the same..There can be no such thing as a good cop as long as they choose to do so...becuase no one is forcing them to..
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I know a lot of good cops that just want to catch bad guys and keep people safe. I also know a few shitty ones. I even know an ex cop that was too shitty to be a cop. No matter who they are, they all like to be treated like human beings. Oh, and they don't like being called cops.

The point I'm trying to make is that if you're kind to the police officer and cooperating then there's no chance anything bad is going to happen.

99% of people that get screwed over by police had it coming. The media likes to report that 1% so it feels like there's an epidemic when there really isn't. I've been on that 1%'s side and I hold no resentment. I understand that police are only human and fear for their safety same as anyone else.

Fortunately I wasn't physically beaten or shot, but it's because I made damn sure I cooperated. If I had done something stupid like try to run or shove the officer I'd probably be dead. It's all about how you behave. Basically, don't be an asshole or an idiot to police and everything will be fine, more or less. If a police officer has to talk to you, chances are it's for a reason.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Chose to purposely ignore every word of my reply you didn't care for. Cognitive Dissonance and confirmation bias at it's best. Kind to the officer?? Me and others see at it as being told to kiss theirs asses. Not going to do it. There is an epidemic because there are no good cops. To be a cop? he must set aside any moral compass you may have and leave integrity at home. Thats a requirement if your going to harass, arrest, and kill people for unjust, and unconstitutional laws. Protecting people? The odds a cop will actually arrive at a genuine crime scene in time to actually save a TRUE victim or very slim to none. House on fire? you need firemen, Are you sick? see a doctor..Being robbed etc? YOU SHOULD HAVE A GUN. Cops won't be there and even if they did arrive in time?? You may be the victim of friendly fire and worse, I didn't wake up one day and say gee..I hate cops hate cops..I slowly woke up and realized reality..They say without LE and government there would be chaos..Well? these two entities have been the CAUSE for a hell of a lot of chaos and human suffrage in the history of mankind..
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Well, I'm nice to police and I get let off with warnings when I get caught speeding.

Make sure you drive slow!
0 ups
Well, besides ignoring facts again you just admitted your not a law abiding citizen and kissing their asses gives you pass??..lolol Or in other words? They are not doing their so called "job" and letting you break the law..why not since they do so everyday as well..
Flip Settings
Deadpool Surprised memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
KIDS ARE BEING SEPARATED FROM THEIR PARENTS WHEN THEIR PARENTS DRAG THEM THOUSANDS OF MILES ACROSS A DESERT THEN INDUCE THEM TO COMMIT A CRIME? IT'S A SHAME THERE ISN'T A WALL ON THE BORDER TO PROTECT THE KIDS FROM THEIR UNFIT PARENTS
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back