If Regressives really cared about kids, they'd build the wall. And get rid of Planned Parenthood, but that's another meme ...

Nope but it's a crime to sneak illegally into a country to which you hold no citizenship.

At least they are doing it peacefully compared to our European ancestors.

https://i.imgflip.com/2dcn88.jpg

Um, wOt?

doesn’t alter the fact of today. And these migrants being peaceful.

"most of them"
never all of them
That´s just not possible.

Well when you provide me video evidence of illegals walking up to points of entry or out in the desert with weaponry, armored vehicles etc and engaging our military and border patrol in fire fights? I'll stick with my statement..lol

interesting how specific your requirements are.

Yes they are specific. because more often than not things like this are not just black and white..Take Trumps comments on the Separating parents.. HE clearly lied and thats Black and White..Regarding the flow of illegals? cause and effect will vary..

The problems with illegals is not black and white.

Human and child traficing is a problem.
Most problems with illegals are not at the border.
Drugs. Thievery. Murder.

I like open borders but I can not turn a blind eye on the negatives. If we/they can stop the problematic illegals. Then the puplic eye on the illegals inside the borders gets better.
BUT the best thing would be if there were only legal immigrants. Illegal immigrants are forced by their illegal status to work hidden from the law. That causes more trouble.

I think I just said that it’s not a black n White issue regarding immigration. As for the minor issue of criminal illegal immigrants? Putting aside drugs because they are only supplying the demand of American drug users who come in all ages and races. Up to the wealthy. Murder? Drug cartels, runners, on the dealer on the street? They don’t force anyone to by the product. As for OIS? They happen due to corrupt and unconstitutional laws that create criminals. Ponder it. Government creates a problem where it did not exist then needs your taxes to fix it. The drug war was lost before it began only wasting billions and tossing away good lives of LE and others. The odds of you being killed by a stranger are slim to none. Yes there are sex traffickers so dehumanize all immigrants and their children? Never voted so being a libturd is off the table. Lol

It's not even like sneaking, some of the tunnels are over 100 years old

So I guess you're going to be quiet now? Or do you only believe news from MS13NBC? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/border-patrol-agent-shooting-update-today-2018-06-13/

No not really..You are comparing apples to oranges. A drug runner is not attempting to enter to actually live here and find a better life. A drug runner is doing so to supply the demand of American drug habits..Maybe something got lost in translation. a singular shooting is unfortunate but a fire fight does make. Even the drug runner does not actual thrive on conflict. criminals and so called "criminals" tend to try and avoid contact with LE..My statement clearly said crossing and purposely engaging government agents..PURPOSELY But since the text of my post doesn't fit your agenda you discard the things that don't support or defeat your views...BTW? Ive never voted democrat and i say that because so many on the right seem to think every right winger should hold the exact same opinion. if not? they are a libtard..lolol

It's also about changing the voter base. Remember, if you can't change the voter's mind, just change the voter.

Could you provide a actual valid source to the contents of such a bill? That demands sex traffickers and drug runners can't be arrested I WOULD LOVE TO READ THAT

"...actual valid source to the contents of such a bill..."
This usually means, "I'm going to judge what the source you supply says about the contents of the bill based on my political/moral biases, if I even read what that source has to say."

It is called the Keep Families Together Act. Every Democrat has co-sponsored it, no Republicans have.

If I give you centrist/moderate or right of center news sources who will point out the negative aspects and consequences of the bill, depending on your political biases you my say something like, "Those are right wing sources, how can I trust that!?"

If you are so inclined, you can do the intellectually honest thing and take the name of the bill and find various sources to explain the contents of the bill.

I would suggest reading multiple sources and not being like the average person on the internet and staying in a political/social/moral bubble and comfort zone and only listening to or reading sources that only talk about either the beneficial or negative consequences of proposed legislation.

Not even a good effort at a logical fallacy.

I'm not sure you even know how to articulate when someone uses a logical fallacy.
If it is "not...a logical fallacy" that means it is logical.

Since I never told you to disprove my statement I did not commit a "burden of proof fallacy."

Me telling you the name of the bill and suggesting that you find your own sources concerning the contents goes right along with your requests of "...actual valid sources..." Instead of my giving you the sources that talk about criminal illegal aliens not being detained and investigated properly, I suggested you go and find them yourself. That is perfectly logical.

BUT everyone reading this knows you are not going to go do that...

If you want here is the entire text of the bill, enjoy. (You are not going to read this either...)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/3036/text

https://i.imgflip.com/2cq623.jpg

All I see is irony when you post that

you're a f**kin bot! BOOO

Gotta love those democrats !

Without the will of our more progressive/liberal ancestors pushing for human progress against the tides of religious caliphates such as Christianity, Islam, and judaism etc. There would be NO scientific method. Funny thing though? Today? Christians and other religions LOVE all the creature comforts and weapons the scientific method has created "until" it's applied to the existence of their false deities..lol then it becomes hogwash..

We should torture kids and take them away from their parents because their parents crossed an imaginary line.

Nobody tortures them.
Borders are real.
Don't believe me? Walk into Russia unannounced and start speaking English.

Russia believes in imaginary lines too, in which case. Just as ridiculous as certain Americans.

Dam dude...
How's the weather in Neverland?
Name a country with no border.

Seriously though. Humans have been drawing lines in the sand since before written history. I think it's been established that borders are a real thing and not to be crossed without permission or consequences.

Naming a country with no border is about the same as naming all countries with imaginary lines, if not entirely the same.

Yes, but the humans in ancient history's lines were real. Possibly the one only real border existing today is the Great Wall of China, and it's not even a line; it's a wall. There are possible mountain/river borders between nations, but not here in the US.

Bro, your going to tear your arm off if you keep reaching like that.

Are you suggesting that to even have a border to defend we must build a wall otherwise the border is undefined?

Here in Texas we have the Rio Grande that every illegal immigrant must cross over to enter the country from Mexico.

At some point in human history, man gained the mental faculties to create borders without the need for physical boundaries. Today we use latitudes and longitudes. I suppose we could throw away our mental evolution and go back to actual lines in the sand but don't you think that's a little regressive?

"Here in Texas we have the Rio Grande that every illegal immigrant must cross over to enter the country from Mexico"

No we don't. As it happens, most illegal immigrants take an airplanes across the borders. As a result, the Rio Grande suddenly becomes less of an obstacle unless the airplane happens to land in it to rescue the passengers.

And no, I suggest we don't have borders. I suggest we don't have nations.

Dam the dems are good at manipulating people. The new magic words of the week are "overstayers" and "illegals entrants". No illegal entrants arrive by plane, unless they're in a suitcase.

This is getting ridiculous.

We do have borders, we do have nations. You're mentally challenged if you don't think so. I don't really even know how to reply to that.

I'm beginning to think the new left tactic is to just say super retarded things to baffle people with intelligence. In fairness, it's working.

Good thing I'm not a Democrat. I'm more of a moderate if anything.

I think we do have nations. I just don't think we should have them.

You're too far out. That kind of thinking is about 1000 years too early.

I thought the old days were better.

Any family that crosses thousands of miles of desert to come here I'll personally encore for citizenship. I mean which desert and why cross it? Anyways, keep the faith on the wall... Murica!

Guatemala is 2000+ miles from California. Central Mexican Matorral, Sonora Desert, Chihuahua Desert, Baja Desert, Yuma Desert, etc.