Ironic isn't it?

lol

LOL

What's really scary is I can't remember what I made that pic for originally lol!

True, Brian's head is too big I pay more attention to that sort of thing now. I think that pic went along with this one lol!

So they held this meme for 10 hours today...can you believe that?

They held my nsfw one for almost 8 until the middle of the night last night so yeah I believe it lol. Just submitted one that will take forever I am sure but my bday one went through in 3. I still have a submission left for today if I can open my eyes enough to make one. The Snooki pickle one took a lot out of me ;)

I realized Snooki pickle one might not be enough of an explanation to just leave things at haha! imgflip.com/i/211b0g proof of the power of my bday buzz right here!

stole it from you and just love it.

Help yourself.

I'll have a thorough look next Octoberfest. If they are here, they probably would come to this place to study the craziness of people from all over the world.

Hey, you are smart with money, Buggylememe! MEEM, you bet! It’s not so easy for non-citizens, but I guess the type of guy in your picture changed quickly in the basement and played the tour guide for some newbies –so here we have a MEEM and a MEME.

You mean like Ajit Pai?

No idea what that is.

The little shit that just destroyed net neutrality.

He was probably made by accident.

Well, the chances of evolution creating all the species of the earth, and us as well is lower than googleplex

The funny thing about everybody wanting to argue about evolution is that this meme is nothing about that at all...LOL

Well, it is a litte bit. The fact that these amazing machines replicate themselves (with variations) even by accident raises the question who invented that replication mechanism.

My thought process on this meme never went past the irony of the world's most complex machine being made without even trying...I guess some people just need to find a reason to argue...doesn't matter what the subject matter is...Turning it into religion vs evolution is so far off the mark that it's just sad.

Ha, ha, Cobalt, not by accident, it's because you thought element no. 27 was the greatest!

Thanks for the compliment! I don't want to deepen this any more, though. I just wanted to let you know that there are some people around who keep their eyes and ears open. Have a good week!

most machines cant be made by accident or without knowledge from their creators, so yes it is quite impressive

B/c that type of nonsense belongs in our schools

In addition to just a quick reference to your condescending attitude, red herrings, and other nonsense, I think I'd like to mention that your sarcasm is somewhere close to on point.

Did you consider that the current theory taught in the schools that I have visited is called "evolution" and that it contains abiogenesis?

There is no "idea which explains the diversity of life on this planet which is supported by mountains of evidence and follows the scientific method" - and I never claimed that there was. You used a straw man argument - but no - I never claimed I had another position. I merely commented onto the fact that schools are teaching something nonsensical. I could propose a better theory - but there is nothing to gain from it for me or you at this time.

A travesty would occur if I were not to mention your use of swearing with a rainbow pony - both of which are sad in my opinion.

A very good day to you all!

Your red herring is asking if I have a theory that has mountains of evidence. It is not relevant to the complaint I was making.

The theory of evolution (not even the fact that it is based on abiogenesis and has no other way of explaining the existence of life, matter, or energy, or the existence of coherent laws of nature as far as I have heard).

The most simple nonsensical piece of evolution separate from its lack of any scientific explanation for the existence of the universe is its dependency upon creatures gaining genetic information over mutation, a process that damages and alters, but does not add genetic information in any kind of predictable or productive way. The evolutionary progression by microevolution alone does not explain the diversity of life forms that we see - macro evolution would be required, and at the moment evidence (as well as common sense) really doesn't favor macroevolution.

If I went to propose the theory that I believe is most substantially evidenced, I would state at best one that is not fully supported by evidence. Science has its limits - and I think that this field will never eliminate the doubts of all. However, if pushed, I will perhaps share what I think created the universe, albeit my original goal was merely to reference how silly our current origin theory of evolution/abiogenesis.

Alliteration alters all anomalies allowing for awesome aerial arguments. (That was not nearly as good as your alliteration - well done.)

Thank you for your willingness to discuss this in a useful fashion rather than merely hurling derogatory reference and memes back and forth.

I'll try to keep the responses short.

The concept of "Evolution" has been presented to me as an all-encompassing explanation for abiogenesis, development of organisms, the origin of mass/energy/time/laws of nature, etc. Would you like to deal with the different terms for each piece - I don't know them. I lumped them all together - which I learned is improper.

I found a quick article for research that takes your side strongly, and I just wanna comment on one small part of it real quick - I could talk about the rest, but time is

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/

The examples given of "information added by mutation" are in fact not new programming for new structures but merely the rearrangement or failure to discontinue already present structures - this cannot account for any change in genus. Species is not well-defined line - and we do see more species form all the time.

Macroevolution requires more than microevolution steps. Microevolution can make small changes - but to change from a plant to an animal or a fish to an amphibian takes much more drastic change than microevolution - even if you had a large quantity of micro evolutionary steps.

Thx for the time.

Cannot provide anything as long as our math is as buggy as it is - it's probably a weird mixture of things!

Math is as Buggy? BUGGY! OMG! Thnx for noticing me senpai. I love you senpai. :3
I have a severe mental issue with my brain, it's called anime

Yes it is. And it looks as if it has indeed been a major catastrophe for science. As regards anime, I have no idea about this, never saw it. But I certainly know about severe mental issues - so severe that I have to keep my mouth shut. I wish you all the best for whatever bothers you, and never give up <3!

My life is bread

wair for it, the wine will come!