Imgflip Logo Icon

But That's None Of My Business

But That's None Of My Business Meme | HOW IS THE CONSTITUTION A LIVING DOCUMENT THAT PROTECTS TEXT MESSAGES, EMAILS,  AND PHONE CALLS, YET THE 2ND AMENDMENT ONLY MEANS MUSKETS? LIBERAL LOGIC | image tagged in memes,but thats none of my business,kermit the frog | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4,650 views 71 upvotes Made by anonymous 7 years ago in fun
But That's None Of My Business memeCaption this Meme
43 Comments
9 ups, 7y
Not my meme, but another example of liberal logic.
6 ups, 7y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 7y
Excellent point!
3 ups, 7y
Leonardo Dicaprio Cheers Meme | GOOD POINT | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio cheers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It’s just a piece of paper in the museum now.....
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y,
1 reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 7y,
1 reply
The thirteenth amendment was necessary. That's an example of adding or changing the constitution in the right way.

The point to this meme is the left claiming the 2nd amendment was meant for muskets only, and the same left says that free speech includes modern things like emails and phone conversations.
[deleted]
2 ups, 7y,
1 reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 7y,
1 reply
The 2nd amendment was originally written for the protection of the people against their government should they turn against them.

I agree we shouldn't just have access to nukes and sidewinders used in battle, but as far as guns are concerned, I don't think there should be limits. I do believe the stronger the gun, the more background checks there should be and more safety classes.
[deleted]
1 up, 7y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 7y
They don't have to be government classes. I think privately owned gun shops and gun owners should teach the classes. I just don't think people should have guns if they don't know how to use them properly.
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 7y,
3 replies
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/07/gun-violence-study-chicago/1969227/

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/10/02/gun_control_by_state_tougher_laws_mean_fewer_deaths.html

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/07/gun-violence-study-chicago/1969227/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/06/barack-obama/obama-more-gun-laws-means-fewer-gun-deaths/

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/the-states-with-the-most-gun-laws-see-the-fewest-gun-related-deaths/448044/

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/10/gun-laws-deaths-and-crimes/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/states-tough-gun-laws-shooting-deaths-study-article-1.2343815
[deleted]
1 up, 7y,
1 reply
USA Today, The Atlantic, and Slate? Thanks for those bastions of Academic integrity
[deleted]
0 ups, 7y,
1 reply
Yeah they don't reference verifiable sources. You're right. /sarcasm
[deleted]
1 up, 7y
They are not reliable nor verifiable. Progressives don't rely on data and truth or the Scientific Method because they all show them up as Liars.
[deleted]
1 up, 7y
https://www.hoover.org/research/futility-gun-control
[deleted]
1 up, 7y
[deleted]
7 ups, 7y,
2 replies
the founding fathers wanted the guns of the people to be equal to what the government had to fight tyranny. The vegas shooter had tons of thermite too and could have done a whole lot worse had he decided to use it.If they outlaw bumpstocks(they prolly will and I dont mind) a thug can easily convert them anyway.If they outlaw all ar15 etc, there willo be mass smuggling of them into the country and only criminals will have them..Once an invention has been made, it cant be unmade.
3 ups, 7y
right on
[deleted]
7 ups, 7y,
1 reply
no, they didnt imagine bigger weapons like them but there are over 200 million dead in the past 100 yrs because dictators took disarmed the public.The swiss are a perfect example of everyone required to own and operate at least 2 guns, they have no crime at all.Now handguns are very tough to get a hold of there but assault rifles are practically mandatory . The left keeps insisting that guys like trump, Cheney, bush are Hitlers, wouldnt you want a fully armed public if that were true?
[deleted]
4 ups, 7y,
1 reply
and for argument sake, lets say everyone agreed to ban guns, what should the penalty be for someone who is caught with a gun??Prison? no parole? why dont we do that now with repeat offenders?
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y,
1 reply
it was just hypothetical.but i guess you missed that.. Lets say "ban assault weapons" what do you propose we do with the person that is caught with one?
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y,
1 reply
again the swiss its mandatory for everyone own 2 "assault riffles" and they have the lowest crime rate in the world. Plano tx, highest concentration of them in usa, lowest crime rate in usa.. a criminal is going to do crime, no matter what laws are made.
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y,
1 reply
stringent handgun but mandatory for everyone to military assault riffles
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y
to have*
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y,
1 reply
no they imagined the ppl to have guns what the military had.read above
6 ups, 7y,
1 reply
Places with more gun crimes have more gun violence, in fact they have more crime all together. You're an idiot to think that isn't true.
Furthermore why do you liberals keep suggesting you can save us from you? You are the ones commuting the mass murders. It's not us NRA members.
3 ups, 7y
I keep an eye on butthurt knock off profiles.
You're just SAD!
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y
I was making cartridges when I was 12 yrs old(with my military trained father of course). Whatever the gov bans, people will find a way around it. I personally feel Paddock could have killed way more ppl than he did if he used the thermite. He was a millionaire, he could of purchased anything he wanted to illegally from south of the boarder, any amount of laws wouldn't have stopped him
[deleted]
6 ups, 7y
btw "everyday people" do not have "military level weapons" You have pass a serious background check to get them, My uncle is a 35 yr atf agent and he cant even own those weapons, its very strict, it is much easier to get them smuggled in from south of the boarder but that would be a violation of the law but all criminals dont give a crap about any laws. if you ban them, only the thugs will have them
[deleted]
6 ups, 7y,
1 reply
Plano Tx has the highest legal concentration of guns per capita . there are more guns there than ppl. it has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.
[deleted]
9 ups, 7y,
1 reply
And Chicago has an average of over 700 murders per year and they have the strictest gun laws in the country. Thank you Obama.
[deleted]
6 ups, 7y
amen
[deleted]
6 ups, 7y
You missed that point.
4 ups, 7y
But That's None Of My Business memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
HOW IS THE CONSTITUTION A LIVING DOCUMENT THAT PROTECTS TEXT MESSAGES, EMAILS, AND PHONE CALLS, YET THE 2ND AMENDMENT ONLY MEANS MUSKETS? LIBERAL LOGIC