But Thats None Of My Business

But Thats None Of My Business Meme | HOW IS THE CONSTITUTION A LIVING DOCUMENT THAT PROTECTS TEXT MESSAGES, EMAILS,  AND PHONE CALLS, YET THE 2ND AMENDMENT ONLY MEANS MUSKETS? L | image tagged in memes,but thats none of my business,kermit the frog | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3,775 views, 68 upvotes, Made by SpursFanFromAround 7 months ago memesbut thats none of my businesskermit the frog
But Thats None Of My Business memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
9 ups
Not my meme, but another example of liberal logic.
i.imgflip.com/1x71ka.jpg (click to show)
reply
6 ups
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
3 ups
Leonardo Dicaprio Cheers Meme | GOOD POINT | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio cheers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It’s just a piece of paper in the museum now.....
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
But Thats None Of My Business Meme | IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT LIVING AND DOESN'T CHANGE ...EXCEPT FOR THAT WHOLE SLAVERY THING | image tagged in memes,but thats none of my business,kermit the frog | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I don't know anyone who thinks the Constitution never needs changing. The question is, change it how?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
The thirteenth amendment was necessary. That's an example of adding or changing the constitution in the right way.

The point to this meme is the left claiming the 2nd amendment was meant for muskets only, and the same left says that free speech includes modern things like emails and phone conversations.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I do see your point, and although I am a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, the question needs to be asked: in 1776, the weapons used by the military were more or less (barring massive cannon) the same as that used by the average person in their daily life. That is no longer the case, what with the military having access to weapons of mass destruction that could level a city block, and enough explosives to orbit Arnold Schwarzenegger. The question is: should the line be drawn? And if so, where? I don't believe the average person should have access to Stinger missiles and RPGs, and I'm sure most people would agree with me. Where do we draw the line?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
The 2nd amendment was originally written for the protection of the people against their government should they turn against them.

I agree we shouldn't just have access to nukes and sidewinders used in battle, but as far as guns are concerned, I don't think there should be limits. I do believe the stronger the gun, the more background checks there should be and more safety classes.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I would agree with everything except the safety classes part. Call me crazy, but when you say that gun ownership requires government-mandated safety classes, that's just one more way for the government to regulate stuff. Are safety classes good? Of course. Should they be mandatory? I don't think so. Some people might make the comparison to how you can't get a driver's license without first taking a government-mandated driver's test. I understand that. But I don't think they're the same thing.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
They don't have to be government classes. I think privately owned gun shops and gun owners should teach the classes. I just don't think people should have guns if they don't know how to use them properly.
reply
1 up
I'm not saying safety classes are unnecessary; I just don't think the gov't should be mandating it.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3 replies
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/07/gun-violence-study-chicago/1969227/

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/10/02/gun_control_by_state_tougher_laws_mean_fewer_deaths.html

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/07/gun-violence-study-chicago/1969227/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/06/barack-obama/obama-more-gun-laws-means-fewer-gun-deaths/

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/the-states-with-the-most-gun-laws-see-the-fewest-gun-related-deaths/448044/

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/10/gun-laws-deaths-and-crimes/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/states-tough-gun-laws-shooting-deaths-study-article-1.2343815
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
USA Today, The Atlantic, and Slate? Thanks for those bastions of Academic integrity
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 1 reply
Yeah they don't reference verifiable sources. You're right. /sarcasm
reply
[deleted]
1 up
They are not reliable nor verifiable. Progressives don't rely on data and truth or the Scientific Method because they all show them up as Liars.
reply
[deleted]
1 up
https://www.hoover.org/research/futility-gun-control
reply
[deleted]
1 up
reply
2 ups
Excellent point!
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
the founding fathers wanted the guns of the people to be equal to what the government had to fight tyranny. The vegas shooter had tons of thermite too and could have done a whole lot worse had he decided to use it.If they outlaw bumpstocks(they prolly will and I dont mind) a thug can easily convert them anyway.If they outlaw all ar15 etc, there willo be mass smuggling of them into the country and only criminals will have them..Once an invention has been made, it cant be unmade.
reply
3 ups
right on
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
no, they didnt imagine bigger weapons like them but there are over 200 million dead in the past 100 yrs because dictators took disarmed the public.The swiss are a perfect example of everyone required to own and operate at least 2 guns, they have no crime at all.Now handguns are very tough to get a hold of there but assault rifles are practically mandatory . The left keeps insisting that guys like trump, Cheney, bush are Hitlers, wouldnt you want a fully armed public if that were true?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
and for argument sake, lets say everyone agreed to ban guns, what should the penalty be for someone who is caught with a gun??Prison? no parole? why dont we do that now with repeat offenders?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
it was just hypothetical.but i guess you missed that.. Lets say "ban assault weapons" what do you propose we do with the person that is caught with one?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
again the swiss its mandatory for everyone own 2 "assault riffles" and they have the lowest crime rate in the world. Plano tx, highest concentration of them in usa, lowest crime rate in usa.. a criminal is going to do crime, no matter what laws are made.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
stringent handgun but mandatory for everyone to military assault riffles
reply
3 ups
to have*
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
no they imagined the ppl to have guns what the military had.read above
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Places with more gun crimes have more gun violence, in fact they have more crime all together. You're an idiot to think that isn't true.
Furthermore why do you liberals keep suggesting you can save us from you? You are the ones commuting the mass murders. It's not us NRA members.
reply
2 ups
I keep an eye on butthurt knock off profiles.
You're just SAD!
reply
3 ups
I was making cartridges when I was 12 yrs old(with my military trained father of course). Whatever the gov bans, people will find a way around it. I personally feel Paddock could have killed way more ppl than he did if he used the thermite. He was a millionaire, he could of purchased anything he wanted to illegally from south of the boarder, any amount of laws wouldn't have stopped him
reply
6 ups
btw "everyday people" do not have "military level weapons" You have pass a serious background check to get them, My uncle is a 35 yr atf agent and he cant even own those weapons, its very strict, it is much easier to get them smuggled in from south of the boarder but that would be a violation of the law but all criminals dont give a crap about any laws. if you ban them, only the thugs will have them
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Plano Tx has the highest legal concentration of guns per capita . there are more guns there than ppl. it has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
And Chicago has an average of over 700 murders per year and they have the strictest gun laws in the country. Thank you Obama.
reply
6 ups
amen
reply
5 ups
You missed that point.
reply
3 ups
Flip Settings
But Thats None Of My Business memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
HOW IS THE CONSTITUTION A LIVING DOCUMENT THAT PROTECTS TEXT MESSAGES, EMAILS, AND PHONE CALLS, YET THE 2ND AMENDMENT ONLY MEANS MUSKETS? LIBERAL LOGIC
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back