Don't forget (1) the wreckage was scattered across at least five miles, not just that "crash site", and (3) the witness who described the airplane being followed by something she obviously didn't know as an A-10, but described the distinctive A-10 perfectly too.
Agree. The best evidence indicates the plane was destroyed in the air, with the debris scattering, and I assume the A-10 was responsible. Anything that supposedly hit ground there was flimsy at best, and since there was provable prep for the rest of the events that day, it's not hard to imagine they prepped that site so as to have some kind of explanation for the fate of the victims of the "terrorism." I think the witness may have been on Loose Change but don't recall for sure. The bodies part - you may recall the AP story pulled two hours after it posted, about mayor announcing the Boston plane landing in Ohio and unloading passengers on account of the "bomb threat" (I think I have screenshots somebody captured), sort of Northwoods style, but we may not know till there's some kind of forcible disclosure on the whole operation. But you're completely right that the official story stinks worse than an unshowered crack w**re.
Ha ha, good analogy! :) Ive seen the old Loose Change and the newest one, and countless other 9-11 vids on youtube. The thing is, where did the towers go is pointing to technology normal people dont know about, like steel beams disintegrating into dust in thin air on the video clips as the towers collapse. Too much info. We won't be truly free till this conspiracy is revealed. Plus, there is not one 911 lawsuit in the courts so there will be no display of evidence, ever. All that were set to file lawsuits were settled out of court.... Nice.
Interestingly in the connection, I've tried to do a meme on the Pentagon, and it curiously never manages to get "featured", not that mods going to bother explaining everything, but it obviously got specifically disfavored. I'm going to see if I can link for it below.
So the shots of the pentagon - plane size vs the hole...not a fact? Huh. Tough critic. One does not simply.... Have something original in your photo....particularly when speaking about a subject this old.
Aside from the memes - there was a bit of a "debate" - with a flat earther from the 9/11 Lie machine. I was hoping that you might hold forth.
I think that both our eyes work fine.Any non-expert pilot - would surely have been driven into the lawn by ground effect. And this guy couldn't fly well enough in a cessna to stay in Flight school (assuming anything at ALL about the prevailing narrative to be true).
DC ATC saw that corkscrew turn dropping several thousand feet on radar and thought that it was A) a military jet or B) a simulation from one of the war games.