Happy Martin Luther King Jr. Day!

[image deleted]

Ask Malcolm X how his violence & hatred worked out for him.

I'm no Christian, but I believe Jesus Christ didn't, either. Look at what happened, though..... Crusades (among other things) anyone?

Many people, some believers who sinned, others not really of faith, did bad things. But the crusade issue showed bad judgment by both religious and secular leaders. One side moved on, the other not so much.

Leaders and follower have been showing awful judgement, before and since, but you probably know that. I just hate it when people do nasty things and say "God told me to." or something such. Yes, they have done foul stuff for other reasons, I realize.

Catholics were trying to push back muslims.
People forget that.
They make it seem like the crusaders were soooo bad.
When I'm reality, they werent.

Well, the fourth crusade wasn't great. European Christians vs. Byzantine Christians. The European Christians had made Constantinople (Istanbul) more vulnerable to the Ottoman invasion later.

Info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpVEkH14Jrc

That's was the 2nd best crusade in my opinion.
I'm ready to...

I meant in the sense that it wasn't great for the people involved. If they didn't die, they were excommunicated from the church. In those days, those options were in essence the same.

Well they were heretics.
I hear ya though.
Good knowledge.

Crusades were a direct response to the Islamic caliphate Waring it's way through europe.
Basically what we 're seeing today.
History books won't tell you that in Obama's america.

I suppose you think I'm taking Islam's side. I'm not. I don't really take any religion/faith's side.

Wasn't asking you to take sides.
Just educating you on the crusades.

I'm no christian either. Just wanted to get that in there.

And you're proud of that, why exactly? Because nobody cares if you believe in nothing... take that to the bank.

I'm proud to be a free thinker because religion is bad for people and I don't suffer from that delusion.

Oh, so you're just a religious bigot. A free thinker would see the positive side as well, not just buy into the post modern bullshit being fed by your secular puppet masters in academia, the media and most of all, big government.

Tell the alcoholic who turned his life around in a church that "religion is bad for people." Tell that to the orphans overseas who get fed by people of faith working as unpaid missionary volunteers. And hundreds of other real world and very tangible examples too obvious for a "free thinker" to come up with. You are a joke. Free thinker... LMAO. Go f*ck yourself, you common, tiny minded bigot.

Well all those positive outcomes are attainable by nonreligious means. But if you want to convince someone to blow up a building religion is your best bet. And are you inviting me to f**k myself as a xtian? Is that from the sermon on the mount?

I'm not the suffer fools gladly, turn the other cheek type. And nothing hypocritical about you using religious references, is there?

You understand nothing about religion and even less about yourself. Bigoted fool that you are.

Nope. If I dislike religious people I'm a bigot. Instead I dislike religious ideas. They shackle the mind. Thanks for your positive feedback about my understanding of myself. Your words are absolutely illuminating. The more you tell me about myself the more I learn about you. Today i learned you're a condescending hypocrite. Go tell that on the mountain.

Among the other items that are incorrect in your last post, you learned nothing today. Don't flatter yourself, it's unbecoming. Even for a tool that has to point out that "I'm no christian either. Just wanted to get that in there" to no one in particular.

Of course you're not a Christian, you stand for nothing, you believe in nothing. And when you believe in nothing, you'll believe anything.

That's moronic rabble rousing. I stand for myself, my family and my fellow man. I just don't need to make a silly construct around it where whoever doesn't believe what I believe will languish in hell forever. What type of person needs to be threatened with eternal suffering to inspire him to be an equitable person?

The dank was never there...

Aint nobody perfect, and that was an accident dearies

Try this. Instead of answering "No" and then contradicting it, which is obviously dismissive, try "Yes, all lives matter." When you say "No" as an answer first, we understand you're vic sizing (like d*** sizing of who is the biggest victim).

Inwas gonna comment you with a meme comment but I'm too tired maybe tomorrow

I agree with this meme.

I believe all lives matter. Its a part of the Hypocratic oath that all Doctors must pledge.
From the information at my disposal, black lives matter is the most hypocritical group I have documented (Besides modern-day feminism). They are supposed to be for equality, yet, they are willing to loot, pillage, and destroy any property they can lay their hands on. Their leader is also filmed condoning it. Also, they are racist. I have seen video proof of BLM members disrupt and shout at normal people in a library for doing their work peacefully.
I know they claim their cause is for equality, but the person who created the movement was also a sketchy character.
Its also true that there are more public shootings of black people by officers. However, BLM only rallies against shootings where its a white cop shooting.
A couple of weeks ago, a black cop was shot and killed by a black thug. Was a single protest given by the BLM movement?

No. They only care if a white man shoots.

Based on the information, BLM is a racist group.
Need Proof? Check this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpE2BRYqR9g

Sorry If I wasted your time. I just needed to speak my opinion on the internet. ;)

Totally agree with what you. A group wants to create change for the better should not be destroying their own neighborhoods.

With some minor qualifications, I agree. It seems like you're only calling out the BLM folks, not blacks as a whole, yes?

Absolutely. I have no problem with black people as a whole, just the movement that claims to be their voice.

Cool. Much like how I don't dislike women, just what the modern feminists have turned into? Oh, there are plenty of other groups that have earned my ire, that's just an example.

I'm sure women and black people as a whole are positively f**king thrilled about you not having a problem with them. You should get a medal or a plaque or something.

I'm just thrilled at your sarcasm, sugar buns. Now, kiss me.

If you can understand that BLM is not "black people as a whole" then why can you not understand that violent protesters are not BLM as a whole? It's such a simple concept. Why is it so hard to grasp?

Look. I don't know why you don't understand. I made my points clear and concise.
Their own leader gave them permission to be hostile towards others! That is not good at all!
Sure, there may be one or three people who aren't violent, but the majority taints whoever is the minority. Or vice versa, if that is the case. But for me, there is too much evidence to disprove your arguments at the moment. This can be subject to change.

I will let you believe what you want to believe, but don't insult my intelligence.

You start by saying "Look. I know why you don't understand " and end by saying "don't insult my intelligence." It seems you reserve that right for yourself. And you don't understand what a majority is. You should be more open minded. I feel sorry for your patients.

Majority: a group that represents more than half of a population/team/group.
Minority: a group that represents less than half of a population/team/group.

Nobody likes insults. That is self explanatory.
As I said: I will let you believe what you want to believe. I will let you do what you want, as long as it does not harm anyone, physically or emotionally.
As I also said: I don't know for sure if the majority is doing the wrong, or the minority is doing the wrong. All I know is that whatever is more vocal and disruptive has more footage and evidence. I commend you for trying to twist my words, but you have no evidence. I will provide evidence, like in my first post on this meme. I suggest you watch the vids before responding. They are made by another plague doctor (like myself) so he knows what he's doing and has done more research.

Video 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOEebgCfBF0
Video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ-Awv--8Tk

Your first sentence was nothing but condescension. And it doesn't get much better from there. You actually told me you would allow me to believe something within certain parameters. Do you really not understand that you don't control my thoughts? And wtf is a plague doctor? Are playing D and D irl? You should move to a well ventilated area and seek help from there.

Alright, I admit that some of what I said violates my beliefs. I apologize for that.
I'm trying to prove a point, however, so I'm going to choosing to ignore that like how you ignored the meaning behind my words in the original argument.

What is a plague doctor? Don't you know your history?

Also, do you think I don't know the difference between a persona and real life? because that concept is hilarious!

Besides, the original argument was about the BLM. You tried to make it personal.
I will stick by my beliefs here as well. The BLM is an outwardly racist group, with its leader urging violent tendencies. With the current political climate, it might even get worse.

That's what they want you to think. Basically what they're saying is that "black" people are okay so long as they kiss "white" people's butts. The minute that we stop dancing the jig for them, we're suddenly rebels, and well, we just can't have rebels. Though I disagree with BLM because it's begging enemies for mercy, a waste of time, I also understand that said enemies scoffing at those begging them for mercy is the reaction of over entitled princesses.

Am I bad 'cause I'm white, then?

No you're bad because you're human. You just whine about Nature because you're "white" as an ideology instead of behaving like someone who owns their personhood.

If you say so.

It is so whether I say so or not, or whether I agree with it or not. Nature has no favorites. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying to you. It's up to us to align with Nature, or die. That's it.

Nobody is saying anything like that. You have been listening to those promoting victim brotherhood again. The poverty pimping race hustlers like Sharpton, Obama, Jackson and company who think you can't make it without their patronage, which ALWAYS comes at a price.

Welcome to the liberal plantation of the post modern welfare state.

I'm going to chalk your response up to cognitive dissonance. Obviously you missed that I am not dancing a jig for rabid conservatives or fake liberals. You both suck.

Are you a doctor?

Me too. What area?

General Practitioner. I'm not specialized.

Where? it's a dying art. LOL

Right now... Abu Dhabi. I'll soon be moving back to Australia, however.

You look too young to be a doctor.

]https://i.imgflip.com/1d89z4.jpg

Diagnosis: Bullshit

Hahaha. Got you. I was waiting for that pic to be noticed.

Did you think I would really put my photo here? I don't even really know anyone here.

If you are a doctor, what type? I never asked you.

Right now... Abu Dhabi. I'll soon be moving back to Australia, however.

I would not want you treating me.

Not a problem.

You are aware that the Constitution compels officers of the United States to take an oath, right?

Indeed it does, for persons taking a position of trust within the government. Doctors are not elected to a position of trust within the government; they pass a test, pay a fee (tax), and get their medical license.

So the premise that the government can't compel speech is busted, then.
The court can also compel witnesses to testify in most cases.

Not at all. Those are called exceptions, which have been upheld by courts. By your logic, imprisonment is a violation of the 4th Amendment.

Exceptions abound, like the warnings on cigarette packs and the requirement for restaurants to display health inspection certificates and liquor licenses, and the requirement in some jurisdictions to post specific bathroom identification signs. These are all conditions of doing business required by applicable law and regulation.
At any rate, there doesn't seem to have been a ruling on the Hippocratic oath or on any other medical professional oath. They have never been strictly required in this country. Nearly all medical school graduates are administered some sort of oath, though, but in many cases it is seen as non binding.

The surgeon general takes an oath

In other words, the fact that the Surgeon General is a doctor is coincidental to his oath. Hypothetically a president could nominate and the congress approve a Surgeon General without a medical license, a medical degree, nor any medical training whatsoever; he would take the same oath as a real, doctor in the same position, not because he is a doctor but because he would be a member of the Uniformed Services.