Creepy Condescending Wonka

Unfortunately I must disagree, although I believe evolution as it is currently theorized is mostly likely correct. If there were "overwhelming amounts of evidence" it would be a law and not a theory. The scientific method is still at work here.

I'll leave this here.

Perhaps my favorite quote of his.

[image deleted];)

LMAO, I wish I knew if that quote was actually attributed to him or not. Either way, whenever it see it as a comment I laugh my ass off!

1,000 years ago science could not explain lightning, does that mean that back then it was really Thor battling ice giants? Just because science can't explain something today doesn't mean that no possible explaination exists. Many of the predictions made by Einstein's theory of relativity would have to wait decades after his death until scientists & engineers could invent equipment with which to run certain experiments.

Science is an iterative process; each succesive generation stands on the discoveries of previous ones. Yes, science has been wrong before. The fact that scientists admit this is proof of the scientific method being applied properly; otherwise scientists would shoehorn evidence into models or lie outright in attempts to "prove" faulty models. But good science corrects its mistakes and either alters theoretical models (evolution) or scraps them altogether (aether).

And yes, evolution is "just a theory"; but then electron flow is also "just a theory", one upon which the computer or smartphone you are now using is based.

There are opinions of very respected scientists who dispute the mainstream, and there should be. Even General Relativity is suspect (i.e.: Stephan Wolfram). The process does continue.

weird!

Very good counter-point. Like i say in my other comment, I believe it will become law eventually mostly as is, my comments were more geared towards the less educated to keep them from jumping to conclusions. You clearly are well versed as evidenced by the two above replies.

Unfortunately it seems others can't debate it and have chosen to downvote your other reply :(

It's been too long since I've studied that stuff to be able to intelligently discuss it. Plus after three 12 hour overnight shifts my brain is completely mush at this point.

Two more weeks and I'll be back to the land of the living!

Hell yeah! No more 5:30 p.m. to 5:30 a.m., going to 5:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.!

10 hour shifts will be a cake walk compared to 12 hour overnight shifts. Plus I won't be solo a majority of the night.

I don't necessarily mind being solo, but I could die and not be discovered for 11 and a half hours...lol I'm not a morning person either, but this way I'll at least get to see my fiancé every day. It sucks basically going three days without seeing her at all.

All this logic, science, etc... some specific examples would really help your case.

[image deleted]I google'd those and ... honestly I think that hurt your case more. :( anything that actually exists currently? Come on. If everything, EVERYTHING evolves. Then you should be able to cite SOMETHING anything current... Do you not see where I'm going at with this?

*because. The trap is believing God doesn't exist (which can't be proven) or that they didn't actually use macroevolution. I know from my experience that the God of the bible changes hopeless lives for the better, even if many Christians can't explain everything. Scientists and/or atheists can't either. I have lots of education in both subjects, and I'm not an intellectual idiot. Of course some people could "prove" otherwise because I don't know everything. Anyway, I respect the maker of this meme.

If god WAS real, evolution would not be real. Evolution has overwhelming evidence, making it a thing, therefore god is not real.

Not good logic; see my comment & OctaviaMelody.

specific examples please.