When solid water took a victory lap

i almost sank in cum yesterday

Yuh

Stop it

Stop what

Y know what nevermind

Yay

Are you for real?

Yuh

*bends over*

Nuh

Plot twist: phil swift “sawed a boat in half”

N1

Noooooo

i almost sank somebody in cum yesterday

Stop it

I totally do not now him irl

Uhhh

What? Too soon?

LMFAOOOOOO

Glad you like it 😎

Matpat is f**king gone

Titanic was a fraud to get insurance money. Can’t have a mini-sub find the truth. Blow it up, hmmmm. Got you thinking.

You're aware that there have been numerous successful voyages to the wreck of the Titanic. Some of the footage from dives are in the 1997 movie and there were documentaries made about the journeys as well. It's trivial to find photos and video of the wreckage dating back to the 90s.

Furthermore is it so hard to believe the Titan submersible suffered structural failure under intense pressure? Why must everything be a conspiracy? Shit happens during even the best laid plans.

Please do some due diligence before spreading unfounded nonsense.

Really

Man-made climate change is a hoax. Democrats are bullies with bad ideas. You really flagged me? Sorry for you.

I flagged nothing. See how your conspiracy mind jumps to conclusions based on no evidence?
Also how far off topic do you want to go?
Stay calm, stay on topic. Read something well sourced. It'll do you good.

The joke is that some thugs didn't take his $400 T-rump sneakers because they're butt ugly.

I don't condone violence over political views. Truth be told wearing those things might result in getting beaten up. Wearing Pro-Biden sneakers would very likely get people beaten up too. We live in an unfortunately violent society.

There is absolutely no reason to think pro-Biden shoes or clothing would get assaulted. Total projection on your part. Besides the fact that there are few Biden clothing being worn, except illegals at the border.

I don't think I could eyeroll any harder when somebody, anybody claims "group X has a monopoly on violence" especially when that person represents the gun-toting homophobic transphobic women-as-2nd-class-citizens right. Talk about projection.

You do realize that there is evidence that the Titanic was really a scrapped ship cobbled together to look luxurious, then scuttled for the insurance.

Cool so you value evidence. That's good. So how about all the scholarship that backs up that the Titanic is resting at the bottom of the sea near where it sank?
List of articles that are well sourced https://www.snopes.com/search/titanic/

So I link to a mountain of EVIDENCE. Can you supply even a molehill of evidence against? If you truly value evidence as you seem to indicate then only more, better evidence can supplant a multitude of existing evidence.

Leave him be, he's one of those people who refuse to stick to true facts. (and please don't drag me into the convo)

To be fair you've offered yourself up without needing to be dragged. Fair enough. Sometimes I argue with a person not to reach them but to set an example for anybody happening upon the conversation. Thanks for your 2 cents. Have a day.

You took the bait. Now that you believe in evidence: man-made climate change is a hoax. William Happer, Patrick Moore and others. Approximately 90% of earths oxygen comes from the ocean. The Amazon rainforest is a negative producer of oxygen. Wildlife consumes all of the oxygen and more. Nature, there are only two genders. Scientists systematically mislead, depending on the agenda.

I took bait? What you're exhibiting here is that no amount of evidence, scholarship or resources will convince you that your feels are wrong.

That is not how anything works. Reality cares not how you feel. Reality is what it is and we have methodology and rigor, double and triple and quadruple checking of each other's work. The conclusions of science and scholarship are always provisional. They can be changed with adequate evidence and evaluation. You seem to have your mind set no matter what.

Science is your boogeyman because it has the power to dispel preconceived notions. You hold hard to dogmatic nonsense and are failed at the task of learning something.

Do better.

Exactly, which is why I exposed you to the recourses of William Happer and Patrick Moore. Expand your paradigm, start with Descartes.

You say scientists mislead yet go on to cite 2 scientists.

Which is a tactic some use to cherry pick only the evidence that confirms a predetermined conclusion. I'm more interested in consensus of experts in a given field. While interesting that they disagree with consensus you cited a physicist and an astrophysicist.
If I have cancer I don't consult a podiatrist. If I want a climate model I don't go to astrophysicists first. That doesn't automatically mean they're wrong but they have a lot of work to do to overcome the existing models.

That aside while O2 is a factor in Earth climate it has changed very little over the human time frame. There are other greenhouse gasses that have surged since the Industrial Revolution. You seem to be concerned with a bucket of water (your disconfirming evidence) next to a lake of confirming evidence when you make the blanket statement like Climate Change is a hoax.