abortion is murder

Their kind always did want the power to pick and choose who to murder... They protest against Israel shouting "children are being killed" while they protest at home shouting "murdering children is healthcare".

They don't give a sh*t about children.

finnally

someone who agrees with me

ill follow you

hey everybody ICHOR likes killing children

No I never said that

it was heavily implied by you arguing against me saying baby murder is wrong

abortion is litterally killing babys

Abortion kills zygotes or fetus depending on what stage. Sometimes abortions remove already dead fetal tissues or zygotes or embryos. But when a scientist in a lab combine a egg and sperm in a dish and replicates this 1,000 of times then it's not a problem? I don't think any of it is a problem. America could have better cures for decades if it wasn't dealing with goons who can't get over the Wonder of what cells can grow into.

Zygote's contains all of the A genetic information of a new individual organism. Richard Wilhelm Karl Theodor Ritter von Hertwig was the first to describe zygote formation, unfortunately this depth of debate is well over the heads of the ordinary man in the street but it gives a massive amount of support for the notion that indiscriminate abortion can be seen as a form of mass murder.....

But the human that's growing the zygote has no say on if they want the growth to continue or not? Just because the cells within a body can be genetically identified as different doesn't mean the person has no say on if they want that growth in their body. Same with cancer, a growth that has mutated and has no place yet a patient still has a say in getting treatment or not. Pick your poison. Forcing anyone to do something they don't want is the problem. Not having a choice and options is another.

I do not think anyone has an issue with removing a dead from natural cause or defect baby from the mother's womb.

It's the ones still wriggling that are at issue.

Perhaps if you directed your combined energy at the food industry, pharmaceutical industry, and chemical manufacturing industry that are creating your illnesses with their garbage you wouldn't need "better cures".

But since you brought it up, list the cures that have been made available to the world thanks to the cells from murdered babies.

At this time not many cures exist in America, an I totally agree in the garbage food. But still when someone gets cancer because they were exposed to radon, or farming chemicals, or develope Alzheimer's, or Parkinsons and only therapy medicines are available which have been either derived from mouse, or human cells depending on what doctor prescribes, it's still not a cure for diseases that have better treatments in Singapore where most American scientists study on fetal cells.

There is no need to use aborted baby cells to find cures. The last cure i am aware of is louis Pasteur's cure for polio.

Everything coming doen the line is a pharmacological "treatment" designed to keep you alive but still unwell.

Watch an ad for any medication. It is better go have your illness than the side effects of treatment.

What nice PSA.

Most dont pay attention to adverts.

Tell that to someone progressing with parkinson's, or the caregiver who takes care of them. I'm sorry but treatments that reverse the damage need to be offered. And if bio pharma could do that without our greed hopefully they would get out of the side effect business.

Cast aside huge financial gains for the sake of humanity?

Good luck with that. What's stopped big pharma all these years?

I'll answer that - the money is in treatment, not cures.

Abort the healthy baby, save the elderly and infirm.

Kinda like taking parts off of your brand new truck and putting them on your antique truck just so you can wheel it out on a trailer to an auto show a few times a year.

There are alternatives for medical research and testing that do not depend on aborted babies. We have several thousands of years of human existence and medicine as verification.

Change the garbage put in and on our food and much of what ails humanity will go away.

Oh, and lock up the Faucis of the world.

It's not about the process of abort but the process of donated eggs and sperm being used in labs to make zygotes. Science is way past needing aborted fetal cells. They can just make their own in a lab. The question is who is going to say that's wrong. It's not wrong if it's going to bring better treatments to humaniy, but because of restrictions and greed and lack of regulation towards greed we have these problems today.

They've been doing that fetal and stem cell shizz fir 40 years.

What has it gotten them...us?

More pills that keep you on the brink of death.

The mask symptoms. They don't fix anything.

They last thing it gave the world was a vaccine that did nothing.

You can use semantics to make yourself feel better at night but when you mix a sperm with an egg you have initiated human life.

I am not hating on you, merely stating facts as I see them.

I can tell you the process of going through chemotherapy and then having stem cells removed from your own bone is no cake walk when a test tube baby can be made in a lab by a scientist and work better than your own stem cells that carry the mutation in the case of neurodegenerative diseases. Is that wrong I think not since there is no shortage of human sperm and eggs.... But I still think a woman has autonomy over her body so it's up to her to do what she wishes with her body. Reasons unknown.

🤔 would it not be an equally simple task to euthanize (abort) the diseased individual and create a new one to be birthed as a replacement?

Not making light of anyone struggling with illness.

Illustrating the duality in the reasoning.

You could counter that one life could save so many others.

Then I would say, no lives are ever truly saved, merely prolonged.

Even if you're totally healthy you will succumb.

But none of this debate will matter in the next 30 years when children are developed from eugenically selected sperm and egg and born in government hatcheries.

It will likely become a crime for unapproved men and women to reproduce because illness in herds is costly and a burden on every healthcare system. Ask any rancher.

Let me stop here, this tinfoil hat feels heavy on my head. I need to take it off for a spell.

This comment is book worthy. Like a George Orwell perspective.

It is somewhat 1984ish.

The dichotomy is that the U.S. government prohibits the sale of fetal tissue for profit and requires separation between researchers and the women who donate fetuses but they also from 2011 through 2014 alone giving 97 research institutions that is universities and hospitals a total of $280 million in federal grants for fetal tissue research via the National Institutes of Health. I'm sure $280 million buys a lot of abortions.

Addressing the illegality of selling ground up babies for profit... those coolers of toddler tidbits come with millions of dollars of research grants and subsidies.

This is how they are being "sold" for a "profit".

It is a pervasive and insidious business.

An adult that has capacity cannot purchase his or her own death, but a pregnant woman can buy the murder of another defenseless being while others profit millions, billions, and trillions of dollars from her doing so.

Mind you this has gone on much, much longer, but in the 12 years since these grants, what has it amounted to?

What have they cured?

Nothing.

And lots of libtards claiming they have the right to murder.

Maybe it's clones that they achieved. Who knows

Yes.

They have grown a human in a solution without implanting the fertilized egg into a womb.

This has never been for cures.

It has been to replace natural procreation.

To practice eugenics in the creation of a "master race" genetically selected and genetically "engineered" to eliminate defects and enhance resistance to illness, to remove the need for natural procreation and natural parents or the reliance on anybody's GOD.

Meat puppets that are disciples of the state.

Then they would have no guilty feelings or remorse towards suffering and killing.

Still when a woman gets pregnant and doesn't want to continue hatching a egg she should have options available. And scientists need to be more transparent on what they do and accomplish.

Now back to disagreement.

They had options prior to egg fertilization.

Why can't they change their minds when the kid is two days out of the womb?

Two years?

Better yet - why can't an adult decide they themselves do not wish to live any longer and hire a doctor to end their life?

A woman can purchase the murder of her unborn human but not her own death?

Especially the terminally ill (even though we ALL are). That makes it health care.

Like the people that did not want a "vaccination" didn't have an option to exercise their healthcare choice "for the common good", pregnant women should not be afforded a choice.

It is murdering another.

It is wrong.

It should be unlawful to cause harm to the unborn.

Obviously they have cures they just don't want the masses to use.

Then the murdered babies were wasted and humanity defrauded. Assuming you are one that thinks murdering babies so you can live a few more years demonstrates humanity.

If a woman doesn't want to birth and rear a child that is up to her. If a doctor says she needs to terminate her pregnancy because of a complication that's between her doctor, even if she decides to die it's her choice. It's free will and shouldn't be taken away. But as far as profiting off of stem cells, it's unknown. A zygote can be made in a lab by donating sperm and eggs. So do we ban donations of sperm and eggs because potential humans can be made in a lab for IVF recipients...

I disagree with you and the murder of children in the womb.

I don't care about "the science" you feel the need to champion in order to justify your position unto yourself.

Reminds me of the abortion fiends that out of the other side of their mouths bemoan the collateral deaths of Palestinian infants.

Or paid for a lot of researchers Mercedes Benz. Who knows... Schools always say there running out of money and need more from college kids

Not too long ago the right said it's about state's rights but your meme illustrates exactly why we know it's bullsh*t.... Y'all say it's "murder"... and as such, you intend to ban it nationwide and don't actually give a sh*t about state's rights.

YOU don't care about state's rights, women's rights, healthcare rights, or equity in the right to life.

You're free to your opinion about me.

plus im a guy

i hate murderurs

if i can stop baby murders/abortions, then good

thats helpful

murder is illegal everywhere

I like people who get abortions, because then I know they haven't gender transitioned.

dude