Imgflip Logo Icon

The Mods have mysteriously ruled Jeff’s crap legal, and he unfeatured this for harassment, but I can still post here

540 views 4 upvotes Made by Slobama 5 years ago in [deleted stream]
Kylie bazooka gif memeCaption this Meme
23 Comments
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Deal with it | LOOK AT ALL THESE JEFFREY SUBMISSIONS IN THE FUN STREAM | image tagged in look at all these high-res,jeffrey,deal with it | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
These go back several years. Deal with it.
imgflip.com/tag/jeffrey
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Turns out JeffreyStone is capable of memeing like a normal person. He should try this more often! | HE’S CAPABLE OF MEMEING LIKE A NORMAL PERSON | image tagged in nancy pelosi clapping,imgflip trends,imgflip,meanwhile on imgflip,the daily struggle imgflip edition,first world imgflip problem | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Cool, I knew he had it in him

Now what did he do to get banned
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Did you even look at the results bro.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yep. And why are you showing them to me?
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"The Mods have mysteriously ruled Jeff’s crap legal" Appears for you, the mystery is 4 years old.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I’ve always said if he wants to meme like a normal person, that’s fine.
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Can you please define normail?

Normal is not defined by Imgflip. Terms of Use and Submission Rules are.

Where is Jeffrey content or conduct outsite the Terms of Use or Submission Rules?
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
I guess “Normal” is just tongue-in-cheek shorthand for any memer that doesn’t get their rocks off on ImgFlip by posting unsolicited panty selfies any place they can. Fuller explanation below.

JeffreyStone6 is apparently an imposter account, as stated by yourself and G-L-B which complicates the picture a bit.

This 6 account has been a bit more flagrant than most incarnations. Seems like some sick inside joke at the expense of young ImgFlippers, but again, you’d know better than me. Either way, mimicking another memer is against TOS as harassment. Is it not? If it’s not, it should be. And if all that’s true, that account should be banned immediately.

That’s just 6: but even before JeffreyStone6 hit the scene, ImgFlippers knew who he was, or the reaction wouldn’t have been so swift.

I have been told certain of his accounts were banned in the past. Again you hold the cards here.

As for me: I’ve denied his content submissions from SexStream explaining that sexual selfies of other memers are against my policy. That is just a stream Mod’s prerogative. No TOS violation there.

The problem is that he keeps submitting those same sorts of images to me despite my many explanations, and the explanations of other stream Mods I’m sure because he has posted the same content many places. If the stream is on auto-approve, then the Mods have to clean it up later possibly after it has been seen by many others.

At a certain point, this pattern of behavior becomes harassment or spam which is a TOS violation.

Many ImgFlippers put their streams in “lockdown” after being followed by JeffreyStone6. I.e., they turned off auto-approve and stopped accepting new Mods.

All of this detracts from the ImgFlip experience and makes it a more hostile place to be.

OP’s solution of “just block him” isn’t a great one. As far as I know, he can still clutter up your stream and your comments, just with you being unawares. Does ImgFlip have or can it implement a feature to block another memer from posting to your stream, period?

I have floated the idea that Jeff can submit whatever the hell he wants short of literal nudity if he keeps it in his own stream. Or perhaps if he finds another Stream Mod who gives him explicit permission to do so.

Bottom-line: the strong notion I am getting from ImgFlippers is they really don’t want to see another photo of him in panties for the 1000th time.

Call that harassment, spam, mob rule, or just democracy in action.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Seems like a massive deflection.

You haven't answered my question. You are speculating what might happen, not showing me what happened.

JeffreyStone6 has only submitted to his stream or the fun stream. Did you not catch that?

"Either way, mimicking another memer is against TOS as harassment. Is it not? If it’s not, it should be. And if all that’s true, that account should be banned immediately."

Glad to hear you consider your account to be harassment of imgflip.com/user/KylieFan_89
2 ups, 5y
You’re being obtuse. I’m talking about one memer impersonating another.

Mimic Synonyms: imitate, copy, impersonate. One cannot do that to oneself.

I’m a legit alt. It’s obviously me. I’ve told several including yourself why this account exists. I offer a forthright explanation when asked whether I’m real and encourage others to check my recent activity to verify I’m the same KylieFan_89 they know and love.

(Side-note: Why is all that even necessary? Why were other memers skeptical at first? Maybe because there is an account called KylieFan_Mom running about and God knows what else: more obvious harassment permitted by yourself and other Mods.)

So, compare and contrast.

Another question I doubt you’ll answer: Who runs JeffreyStone6?

I was beginning to suspect it’s an inside job, but if you genuinely don’t think impersonation is a TOS violation, then it could be anyone. Either way, for the reasons I’ve stated, it should be deleted immediately.

If not, perhaps just admit the TOS is a hollow lie and that “fun” at anyone’s expense (and that includes JeffreyStone and the “kids” as well) is the real game in town these days.

This is no doubt great fun for whoever runs JeffreyStone6, but it is ruining everyone else’s.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Funny how you never seemed to care about Jeffrey until we refused to cater to the mob and ban him. Not a fan of the guy, just saying he isn't breaking the rules. Innocent until proven guilty, no matter how much that triggers you.

"Bottom-line: the strong notion I am getting from ImgFlippers is they really don’t want to see another photo of him in panties for the 1000th time."

Interesting argument. You say my solution of just blocking him isn't a good one, but if you block him, you never see any of his posts ever again. You never have to see his posts again, he can still post panty selfies, people who get a laugh out of seeing his posts continue seeing them and Andrew and I aren't expected to bend the knee every time someone gets offended. If that's not a win-win, I don't know what is. Also, there are quite a few people on here who would prefer to never see Kylie or Dannii Minogue's faces ever again. So will you be holding yourself accountable to your own rules and never post another image of the Minogues ever again, or is this more of a "rules for thee but not for me" sort of thing?
0 ups, 5y
He’s breaking/has broken the ImgFlip rules for harassment and spam, as I’ve explained several times including in the Anti stream. And whatever he did last time to get his account(s) deleted, which remains opaque to me.

He is not innocent of any of that stuff.

I’m not a fan of Jeffrey either, and haven’t been for months due to his obtuseness in submitting questionable content to SexStream which I keep rejecting with explanations that go unheeded. I tolerated that without much of a fuss.

However: when there’s an aggressive gimmick account running about as well as a democratic grassroots movement (what you would dismissively term “mob rule”) against JS, then yeah, it’s as good a time as any to speak out.

Your solution of “just block him” is okay but not perfect. Stream Mods in particular have to be able to watch what is going on in their own streams to control content. JS could sneakily submit panty selfies if blocked, no?

Better is that his ability to comment has been blocked (as I am told), and if accompanied by a genuine commitment by JeffreyStone himself to keep it in his own streams so to speak, I can live with that.

Now: Comparing fully-clothed (or even partially-clothed) gorgeous and world-famous celebrities posing for professional photo shoots to JeffreyStone‘s janky-ass mirror selfies that almost no one in the world wants to see is just asinine.

But if Kylie/Dannii ever trigger a genuine grassroots uprising on ImgFlip that isn’t in reality a barely-concealed harassment campaign against me because I hurt some conservative feelings, let me know.
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
THIS is NOT normal!!!

imgflip.com/i/3rpk9v#com4228356
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
HOLY SHIT, TELL THAT TO MODS
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Obviously, they don't give a shit...
1 up, 5y
Yep: though an anonymous submission, that is pretty obviously Jeff.

Months ago, he submitted a weird meme to SexStream which sexualized a young girl in braces and incorporated some sort of father-daughter fantasy

Needless to say I rejected that meme
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
that might be illegal in real life I think
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
If JeffreyStone6 is an imposter account, all the more reason to ban it.

If not: Why hasn’t that happened yet?
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Do you have any clue how many copycat/imposter accounts RayDog has?
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
The only way that would work is if they had a simular amout of points
0 ups, 5y
A bunch of posers trying to be the next RayDog but making generally funny and agreeable content while doing so =/= This JeffreyStone6 fellow

Have any of those RayVariants triggered massive uprisings against them?

Fuller explanation above.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
Don't know what to tell you but obviously he got the message
Kylie bazooka gif memeCaption this Meme
Created from video with the Imgflip Animated GIF Maker
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
FIRE!