The right of free speech applies to the government's treatment of its citizens. The government cannot incarcerate someone for a vocalized belief, but citizens can disagree with other fellow citizens without being hypocritical as long as they are not advocating for the incarceration of everyone who disagrees with them.
How is it exaggerating to say that nothing has ever been fair? First, there was slavery, and then there was segregation which literally just ended in our parent's lifetime. Let's discuss being a criminal. Would you advocate for someone having their hands chopped off for stealing bread? If not, then why tolerate a man dying during an arrest for selling untaxed cigarettes?
We'll probably never know if he charged because witness testimony was all over the place. We do know that he was running away when the first shots were fired, which is questionable. And we also know that he was 130-150 feet away from the police SUV when he died (As opposed to the initial statement of 31 feet). So it's not simple, which is why people are arguing about it. I'm also assuming that this meme is referring to Eric Garner and Tamir Rice whose videos show their deaths. http://www.vox.com/2014/8/13/5994305/michael-brown-case-investigation-legal-police-kill-force-murder
Nobody should be unjustly killed by any cop, but because black people worked and died for the profit of white people for several hundred years, a white cop killing a black man will always be questioned (especially if the cop was not actually in danger). Our history and the reality that prejudice still exists make this necessary.
