Technically, I didn't reverse it, I made it about contradictions, but yes, I agree. A claim is nothing without evidence, or else you can just reverse it and that would be an equally valid claim. That was the idea I was going for with the counter-meme.
"Did you change the general term "RELIGION" to the specific term "Christianity"?"
Yes, yes I did, because outright, none of the other religions claim you are being set free. It's just Christianity.
"I did not imply "free will" was granted by religion or Christianity!"
Yes, you did, that was the whole point of the meme, was it not?
"Why does one have to be a slave to anything?"
I don't know, there's good and there's evil. If you do not side with the good, then evil will come and snatch you up. If you are not good, you are evil, and you are, in that sense, a "slave" to both.
The price of corn in Ohio is a red herring, specifically. I said it as an expression claiming that your argument was the red herring fallacy.
If you are not a Christian like me, I don't think you have much reason to think that that homosexuality is evil, just that it may become a problem if everybody was homosexual and no one was having babies. If you are a Christian, homosexuality is evil because God created us to naturally be with the opposite sex, and denying that is denying God's given nature to us, as spoken in the Bible.
I guess your comment series is done, so I guess that means this will be my last response on this string.
"quote"
"if God exists then God is at fault for creating animals..."
Yes. God is responsible for creating animals. I'm saying it's ridiculous to claim that he made a mistake by doing so.
"It may be a mistake, I wouldn't know and I don't know how you would"
It may be true that we can't know anything to be 100% sure, but I am inclined to believe that a perfect God can't make mistakes (because he's perfect), and therefore we are not a mistake. Remember, you were trying to prove that it's highly likely for us to have been a mistake if God created us, you were not trying to prove that it's possible that we were a mistake. We already agree on that.
"Give it time we are only at the cloning stage right now."
That doesn't really engage my point, given that I was claiming that I could have purposefully made something not as great as me without making a mistake in doing so.
"[I don't know if the metaphysical and/or God exist, so I consider them to be dependent on each other] Whether they are or not I have no way of knowing."
So what were we even arguing about?
"If you look at how we measure time you will come to realise there is no measurement of time without movement of some sort of object or [particle], and therefore time is bound to space (distance) and movement (energy)."
Well, I've always looked at it as everything is bound by time, not the other way around, for a rock could not have moved if it had no time to do so. You could have time moving without objects moving, but you can't have objects moving without time moving, and therefore the universe is bound by time (and space). Anyway, that still doesn't really address the problem.
