That would mean a flat tax system, which would prevent the government from influencing how and where we spend and save our money.

It wasn’t feasible for that very reason. Wealthy taxpayers utilized passive real estate losses, oil depletion allowances, and complex tax shelters to drastically lower their taxable income. High nominal rates misallocated talent and capital into tax-shelter industries rather than productive business investments.

But it does show what you’re aiming for.

I guess I don’t understand your meme.

Lunch programs are not socialism. It is taxes used to pay for lunches, but the means of production is not owned and controlled by the government or the workers.

Nice try.